<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Lauren+Rourk</id>
	<title>Theosophy Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Lauren+Rourk"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/en/Special:Contributions/Lauren_Rourk"/>
	<updated>2026-07-01T13:36:55Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22633</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22633"/>
		<updated>2012-08-26T20:20:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 23, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. Regarded as one of the greatest writes of histoy, Shakespeare&#039;s works are continously performed today. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
William Shakespeare was born on April 23, 1564 in Stratford-upon-Avon, to John Shakespeare and Mary Arden. He attended the King&#039;s New School in Stratford, which primarily taught Latin classics and literature. In 1582, William Shakespeare married Anne Hathaway, and had three children, Susanna, Hamnet, and Judith, in the following three years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the birth of his children, William Shakespeare began to act and write in London. He was part owner of the theatrical group, The Lord Chamberlain&#039;s Men, that performed his works. In 1599, The Lord Chamberlain&#039;s men built the Globe Theater on the River Thames to accomadate the larger audiences that Shakespeare&#039;s work attracted. With the death of Queen Elizabeth in 1603, King James I granted Shakespeare&#039;s theatrical group a royal patent and was changed to The King&#039;s Men.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though the following years, Shakespeare became well renowned for his comedies, tradiges, and romances. In 1613, at age 49, Shakespeare left London and returned to Stratford. He spent the remainder of his life writing plays in collaboration with John Fletcher, who became his playwright successor of The King&#039;s Men. Shakespeare passed away on April 23, 1616, and is buried in the Holy Trinity Church.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare-Bacon Mystery==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I recall being present at one of these investigations when in some way&lt;br /&gt;
Francis Bacon&#039; s work came to be examined. Knowing who Bacon is today, as one of&lt;br /&gt;
the Adepts, Bishop Leadbeater felt that to investigate Bacon&#039; s affairs&lt;br /&gt;
clairvoyantly was like a piece of impertinence. But he did note that Bacon wrote&lt;br /&gt;
the plays that pass as Shakespeare&#039; s. However, what particularly drew my&lt;br /&gt;
attention at the time was not that fact, which was fairly obvious to me upon the&lt;br /&gt;
examination of the evidence, but rather something else which Bishop Leadbeater&lt;br /&gt;
noted on higher planes. If Bacon is Shakespeare, and also if several other works&lt;br /&gt;
passing under the names of other authors are also from Bacon&#039; s brain, then,&lt;br /&gt;
there must have been a terrific creative energy in Bacon at the time. Bishop&lt;br /&gt;
Leadbeater said that, as he watched, it was as if some wonderful ray from a&lt;br /&gt;
great creative centre on the inner planes had converged upon Bacon, so that he&lt;br /&gt;
threw off one work after another in the way of plays, poems, philosophical&lt;br /&gt;
theses, etc., without any particular effort. This little glimpse into the power&lt;br /&gt;
of the creative consciousness behind everything was far more fascinating to me&lt;br /&gt;
than the solution of the Bacon-Shakespeare problem.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Occult Investigations&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1938), 40-41.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A deeper truth than even he intended is involved in the words Lord Bacon used&lt;br /&gt;
(playing a part himself, and disguised as Shakespeare) when he said, &amp;quot;All the&lt;br /&gt;
world&#039;s a stage, and all the men and women merely players.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Nature&#039;s Mysteries&#039;&#039; (Krotona, CA: Theosophical Publishing House, 1918), 44.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] held Shakespeare in highest regard. The Introductory of [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]] begins with his words from &#039;&#039;Henry  V&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Gently to hear, kindly to judge.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), xvii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; She further states that &amp;quot;Shakespeare, was and will ever remain the intellectual &amp;quot;Sphinx&amp;quot; of the ages&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 419.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also makes numerous references to verses from Shakespeare&#039;s work in the Theosophical Magazine, [[Lucifer (periodical)|&#039;&#039;Lucifer&#039;&#039;]]. In her article, &amp;quot;Genius&amp;quot; (Volume V, No. 27, November 1889), Blavatsky wrote:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Perchance, in their unsophisticated wisdom, the philosophers of old were nearer truth than are our modern wiseacres, when they endowed man with a tutelar deity, a Spirit whom they called genius. The substance of this entity, to say nothing of its essence—observe the distinction, reader,—and the presence of both manifests itself according to the organism of the person it informs. As Shakespeare says of the genius of great men—what we perceive of his substance “is not here”—“For what you see is but the smallest part And least proportion of humanity: I tell you, madam, were the whole frame here, It is of such a spacious lofty pitch, Your roof were not sufficient to contain it.”* This is precisely what the Esoteric philosophy teaches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;Collected Writings Vol. XII&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1980), 14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare in the Mahatma Letters==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Shakespeare is also mentioned within the [[Mahatma letters]]. In [[ML129#Page 1|one of his letters]], [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] wrote, &amp;quot;My good friend — Shakespeare said truly that “our doubts are traitors.” Why should you doubt or create in your mind ever growing monsters?A little more knowledge in occult laws would have set your mind at rest long ago, avoided many a tear to your gentle lady and pang to yourself.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chin, Vicente Hao, Jr. &#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence&#039;&#039; (Quezon City, Philippines: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 116. See [[Mahatma Letter No. 129#Page 1|Mahatma Letter No. 129 page 1]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In another letter, Shakespeare is mentioned again within the context of the Shakespeare-Bacon mystery. [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] uses the Shakespeare-Bacon mystery as an analogy to the Kiddle-K. H. controversy.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;If fame is sweet to him why will he not be consoled with the thought that the case of the “Kiddle — K.H. parallel passages” has now become as much a cause célèbre in the department of “who is who,” and “which plagiarized from the other?” as the Bacon-Shakespeare mystery; that in intensity of scientific research if not of value, our case is on a par with that of our two great predecessors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., &#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence&#039;&#039; No. 130 (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 433. See [[Mahatma Letter No. 130#Page 13|Mahatma Letter No. 130 page 13]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Understanding by C. Jinarājadāsa==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;But there is a different vision possible and every cultured man and woman knows&lt;br /&gt;
something of it, for it is given to us by the great poets. For what makes a poet&lt;br /&gt;
is a larger vision and especially is the larger vision of man a characteristic&lt;br /&gt;
of the great poets. The great poet stands apart from mankind; you find that&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare, who looks at all men as if from a Mount Olympus, notes their&lt;br /&gt;
foibles and foolishnesses, and yet smiles on them all. There is the spirit of&lt;br /&gt;
the divine vision when he makes one of his characters say about another, &amp;quot; God&lt;br /&gt;
made him, and therefore let him pass for a man.&amp;quot; You will note that, wherever&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare deals with a villain, he has no kind of antipathy to him, whether it&lt;br /&gt;
is to Cassio or Iago; he makes his villain live his life and expound himself,&lt;br /&gt;
for Shakespeare has no resentment of the evil in the villain. Even in the case&lt;br /&gt;
of Falstaff, full of coarseness and trickery, Shakespeare sees the man as he is,&lt;br /&gt;
and there is no condemnatory judgement. A poet observes men as they are;&lt;br /&gt;
therefore we find in the poets a larger vision than that of which the ordinary&lt;br /&gt;
man is capable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Divine Vision&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 4-5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Interpretations by William Q. Judge==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The words of the immortal Shakespeare - &amp;quot;The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interrèd with their bones,&amp;quot; receive a striking exemplification under this doctrine. For, as the evil thoughts and deeds are the more material and therefore more firmly impacted into the Astral Light, while the good, being spiritual, easily fade out, we are in effect at the mercy of the evil done. And the Adepts assert that Shakespeare was, unconsciously to himself, inspired by one of their own number.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;Echoes of the Orient Vol. II&#039;&#039; (San Diego, CA: Point Loma Publications, 1987), 7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Shakespeare was right in saying that life is a play, for the great life of the soul is a drama, and each new life and rebirth another act in which we assume another part and put on a new dress, but all through it we are the self-same person. So instead of its being unjust, it&lt;br /&gt;
is perfect justice, and in no other manner could justice be preserved.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;The Ocean of Theosophy&#039;&#039; (Los Angeles, CA: The Theosophy Company, 1962), 74.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare also believed in the importance of seven in man and nature. [[H. P. Blavatsky]] recognizes that&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Selected Works==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Tragedies&#039;&#039;&#039;: &#039;&#039;Antony and Cleopatra&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Coriolanus&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Hamlet&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Julius Ceasar&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;King Lear&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Macbeth&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Othello&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Romeo and Juliet&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Timon of Athens&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Titus Andronicus&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Troilus and Cressida&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Comedies&#039;&#039;&#039;: &#039;&#039;All&#039;s Well that Ends Well&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Comedy of Errors&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Cymbeline&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Love&#039;s Labor&#039;s Lost&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Measure for Measure&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Merchant of Venice&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Merry Wives of Windsor&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;A Midsummer Night&#039;s Dream&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Much Ado About Nothing&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Pericles (Prince of Tyre)&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Taming of the Shrew&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Temptest&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Twelfth Night&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Two Gentlemen of Verona&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Two Noble Kinsmen&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Winter&#039;s Tale&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Histories&#039;&#039;&#039;: &#039;&#039;Henry IV (Part 1 and 2)&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Henry V&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Henry VI (Part 1, 2, and 3)&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Henry VIII&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;King John&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Richard II&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Richard III&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22632</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22632"/>
		<updated>2012-08-26T20:03:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Biography */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 23, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. Regarded as one of the greatest writes of histoy, Shakespeare&#039;s works are continously performed today. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
William Shakespeare was born on April 23, 1564 in Stratford-upon-Avon, to John Shakespeare and Mary Arden. He attended the King&#039;s New School in Stratford, which primarily taught Latin classics and literature. In 1582, William Shakespeare married Anne Hathaway, and had three children, Susanna, Hamnet, and Judith, in the following three years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the birth of his children, William Shakespeare began to act and write in London. He was part owner of the theatrical group, The Lord Chamberlain&#039;s Men, that performed his works. In 1599, The Lord Chamberlain&#039;s men built the Globe Theater on the River Thames to accomadate the larger audiences that Shakespeare&#039;s work attracted. With the death of Queen Elizabeth in 1603, King James I granted Shakespeare&#039;s theatrical group a royal patent and was changed to The King&#039;s Men.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though the following years, Shakespeare became well renowned for his comedies, tradiges, and romances. In 1613, at age 49, Shakespeare left London and returned to Stratford. He spent the remainder of his life writing plays in collaboration with John Fletcher, who became his playwright successor of The King&#039;s Men. Shakespeare passed away on April 23, 1616, and is buried in the Holy Trinity Church.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare-Bacon Mystery==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I recall being present at one of these investigations when in some way&lt;br /&gt;
Francis Bacon&#039; s work came to be examined. Knowing who Bacon is today, as one of&lt;br /&gt;
the Adepts, Bishop Leadbeater felt that to investigate Bacon&#039; s affairs&lt;br /&gt;
clairvoyantly was like a piece of impertinence. But he did note that Bacon wrote&lt;br /&gt;
the plays that pass as Shakespeare&#039; s. However, what particularly drew my&lt;br /&gt;
attention at the time was not that fact, which was fairly obvious to me upon the&lt;br /&gt;
examination of the evidence, but rather something else which Bishop Leadbeater&lt;br /&gt;
noted on higher planes. If Bacon is Shakespeare, and also if several other works&lt;br /&gt;
passing under the names of other authors are also from Bacon&#039; s brain, then,&lt;br /&gt;
there must have been a terrific creative energy in Bacon at the time. Bishop&lt;br /&gt;
Leadbeater said that, as he watched, it was as if some wonderful ray from a&lt;br /&gt;
great creative centre on the inner planes had converged upon Bacon, so that he&lt;br /&gt;
threw off one work after another in the way of plays, poems, philosophical&lt;br /&gt;
theses, etc., without any particular effort. This little glimpse into the power&lt;br /&gt;
of the creative consciousness behind everything was far more fascinating to me&lt;br /&gt;
than the solution of the Bacon-Shakespeare problem.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Occult Investigations&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1938), 40-41.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A deeper truth than even he intended is involved in the words Lord Bacon used&lt;br /&gt;
(playing a part himself, and disguised as Shakespeare) when he said, &amp;quot;All the&lt;br /&gt;
world&#039;s a stage, and all the men and women merely players.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Nature&#039;s Mysteries&#039;&#039; (Krotona, CA: Theosophical Publishing House, 1918), 44.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] held Shakespeare in highest regard. The Introductory of [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]] begins with his words from &#039;&#039;Henry  V&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Gently to hear, kindly to judge.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), xvii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; She further states that &amp;quot;Shakespeare, was and will ever remain the intellectual &amp;quot;Sphinx&amp;quot; of the ages&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 419.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also makes numerous references to verses from Shakespeare&#039;s work in the Theosophical Magazine, [[Lucifer (periodical)|&#039;&#039;Lucifer&#039;&#039;]]. In her article, &amp;quot;Genius&amp;quot; (Volume V, No. 27, November 1889), Blavatsky wrote:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Perchance, in their unsophisticated wisdom, the philosophers of old were nearer truth than are our modern wiseacres, when they endowed man with a tutelar deity, a Spirit whom they called genius. The substance of this entity, to say nothing of its essence—observe the distinction, reader,—and the presence of both manifests itself according to the organism of the person it informs. As Shakespeare says of the genius of great men—what we perceive of his substance “is not here”—“For what you see is but the smallest part And least proportion of humanity: I tell you, madam, were the whole frame here, It is of such a spacious lofty pitch, Your roof were not sufficient to contain it.”* This is precisely what the Esoteric philosophy teaches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;Collected Writings Vol. XII&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1980), 14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare in the Mahatma Letters==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Shakespeare is also mentioned within the [[Mahatma letters]]. In [[ML129#Page 1|one of his letters]], [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] wrote, &amp;quot;My good friend — Shakespeare said truly that “our doubts are traitors.” Why should you doubt or create in your mind ever growing monsters?A little more knowledge in occult laws would have set your mind at rest long ago, avoided many a tear to your gentle lady and pang to yourself.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chin, Vicente Hao, Jr. &#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence&#039;&#039; (Quezon City, Philippines: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 116. See [[Mahatma Letter No. 129#Page 1|Mahatma Letter No. 129 page 1]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In another letter, Shakespeare is mentioned again within the context of the Shakespeare-Bacon mystery. [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] uses the Shakespeare-Bacon mystery as an analogy to the Kiddle-K. H. controversy.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;If fame is sweet to him why will he not be consoled with the thought that the case of the “Kiddle — K.H. parallel passages” has now become as much a cause célèbre in the department of “who is who,” and “which plagiarized from the other?” as the Bacon-Shakespeare mystery; that in intensity of scientific research if not of value, our case is on a par with that of our two great predecessors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., &#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence&#039;&#039; No. 130 (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 433. See [[Mahatma Letter No. 130#Page 13|Mahatma Letter No. 130 page 13]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Understanding by C. Jinarājadāsa==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;But there is a different vision possible and every cultured man and woman knows&lt;br /&gt;
something of it, for it is given to us by the great poets. For what makes a poet&lt;br /&gt;
is a larger vision and especially is the larger vision of man a characteristic&lt;br /&gt;
of the great poets. The great poet stands apart from mankind; you find that&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare, who looks at all men as if from a Mount Olympus, notes their&lt;br /&gt;
foibles and foolishnesses, and yet smiles on them all. There is the spirit of&lt;br /&gt;
the divine vision when he makes one of his characters say about another, &amp;quot; God&lt;br /&gt;
made him, and therefore let him pass for a man.&amp;quot; You will note that, wherever&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare deals with a villain, he has no kind of antipathy to him, whether it&lt;br /&gt;
is to Cassio or Iago; he makes his villain live his life and expound himself,&lt;br /&gt;
for Shakespeare has no resentment of the evil in the villain. Even in the case&lt;br /&gt;
of Falstaff, full of coarseness and trickery, Shakespeare sees the man as he is,&lt;br /&gt;
and there is no condemnatory judgement. A poet observes men as they are;&lt;br /&gt;
therefore we find in the poets a larger vision than that of which the ordinary&lt;br /&gt;
man is capable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Divine Vision&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 4-5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Interpretations by William Q. Judge==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The words of the immortal Shakespeare - &amp;quot;The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interrèd with their bones,&amp;quot; receive a striking exemplification under this doctrine. For, as the evil thoughts and deeds are the more material and therefore more firmly impacted into the Astral Light, while the good, being spiritual, easily fade out, we are in effect at the mercy of the evil done. And the Adepts assert that Shakespeare was, unconsciously to himself, inspired by one of their own number.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;Echoes of the Orient Vol. II&#039;&#039; (San Diego, CA: Point Loma Publications, 1987), 7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Shakespeare was right in saying that life is a play, for the great life of the soul is a drama, and each new life and rebirth another act in which we assume another part and put on a new dress, but all through it we are the self-same person. So instead of its being unjust, it&lt;br /&gt;
is perfect justice, and in no other manner could justice be preserved.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;The Ocean of Theosophy&#039;&#039; (Los Angeles, CA: The Theosophy Company, 1962), 74.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare also believed in the importance of seven in man and nature. [[H. P. Blavatsky]] recognizes that&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22631</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22631"/>
		<updated>2012-08-26T19:48:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Division of Seven */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 23, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. Regarded as one of the greatest writes of histoy, Shakespeare&#039;s works are continously performed today. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
William Shakespeare was born on April 23, 1564 in Stratford-upon-Avon, to John Shakespeare and Mary Arden. He attended the King&#039;s New School in Stratford, which primarily taught Latin classics and literature. In 1582, William Shakespeare married Anne Hathaway, and had three children, Susanna, Hamnet, and Judith, in the following three years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the birth of his children, William Shakespeare began to act and write in London. He was part owner of the theatrical group, The Lord Chamberlain&#039;s Men, that performed his works. In 1599, The Lord Chamberlain&#039;s men built the Globe Theater on the River Thames to accomadate the larger audiences that Shakespeare&#039;s work attracted. With the death of Queen Elizabeth in 1603, King James I granted Shakespeare&#039;s theatrical group a royal patent and was changed to The King&#039;s Men.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare-Bacon Mystery==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I recall being present at one of these investigations when in some way&lt;br /&gt;
Francis Bacon&#039; s work came to be examined. Knowing who Bacon is today, as one of&lt;br /&gt;
the Adepts, Bishop Leadbeater felt that to investigate Bacon&#039; s affairs&lt;br /&gt;
clairvoyantly was like a piece of impertinence. But he did note that Bacon wrote&lt;br /&gt;
the plays that pass as Shakespeare&#039; s. However, what particularly drew my&lt;br /&gt;
attention at the time was not that fact, which was fairly obvious to me upon the&lt;br /&gt;
examination of the evidence, but rather something else which Bishop Leadbeater&lt;br /&gt;
noted on higher planes. If Bacon is Shakespeare, and also if several other works&lt;br /&gt;
passing under the names of other authors are also from Bacon&#039; s brain, then,&lt;br /&gt;
there must have been a terrific creative energy in Bacon at the time. Bishop&lt;br /&gt;
Leadbeater said that, as he watched, it was as if some wonderful ray from a&lt;br /&gt;
great creative centre on the inner planes had converged upon Bacon, so that he&lt;br /&gt;
threw off one work after another in the way of plays, poems, philosophical&lt;br /&gt;
theses, etc., without any particular effort. This little glimpse into the power&lt;br /&gt;
of the creative consciousness behind everything was far more fascinating to me&lt;br /&gt;
than the solution of the Bacon-Shakespeare problem.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Occult Investigations&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1938), 40-41.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A deeper truth than even he intended is involved in the words Lord Bacon used&lt;br /&gt;
(playing a part himself, and disguised as Shakespeare) when he said, &amp;quot;All the&lt;br /&gt;
world&#039;s a stage, and all the men and women merely players.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Nature&#039;s Mysteries&#039;&#039; (Krotona, CA: Theosophical Publishing House, 1918), 44.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] held Shakespeare in highest regard. The Introductory of [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]] begins with his words from &#039;&#039;Henry  V&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Gently to hear, kindly to judge.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), xvii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; She further states that &amp;quot;Shakespeare, was and will ever remain the intellectual &amp;quot;Sphinx&amp;quot; of the ages&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 419.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also makes numerous references to verses from Shakespeare&#039;s work in the Theosophical Magazine, [[Lucifer (periodical)|&#039;&#039;Lucifer&#039;&#039;]]. In her article, &amp;quot;Genius&amp;quot; (Volume V, No. 27, November 1889), Blavatsky wrote:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Perchance, in their unsophisticated wisdom, the philosophers of old were nearer truth than are our modern wiseacres, when they endowed man with a tutelar deity, a Spirit whom they called genius. The substance of this entity, to say nothing of its essence—observe the distinction, reader,—and the presence of both manifests itself according to the organism of the person it informs. As Shakespeare says of the genius of great men—what we perceive of his substance “is not here”—“For what you see is but the smallest part And least proportion of humanity: I tell you, madam, were the whole frame here, It is of such a spacious lofty pitch, Your roof were not sufficient to contain it.”* This is precisely what the Esoteric philosophy teaches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;Collected Writings Vol. XII&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1980), 14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare in the Mahatma Letters==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Shakespeare is also mentioned within the [[Mahatma letters]]. In [[ML129#Page 1|one of his letters]], [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] wrote, &amp;quot;My good friend — Shakespeare said truly that “our doubts are traitors.” Why should you doubt or create in your mind ever growing monsters?A little more knowledge in occult laws would have set your mind at rest long ago, avoided many a tear to your gentle lady and pang to yourself.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chin, Vicente Hao, Jr. &#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence&#039;&#039; (Quezon City, Philippines: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 116. See [[Mahatma Letter No. 129#Page 1|Mahatma Letter No. 129 page 1]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In another letter, Shakespeare is mentioned again within the context of the Shakespeare-Bacon mystery. [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] uses the Shakespeare-Bacon mystery as an analogy to the Kiddle-K. H. controversy.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;If fame is sweet to him why will he not be consoled with the thought that the case of the “Kiddle — K.H. parallel passages” has now become as much a cause célèbre in the department of “who is who,” and “which plagiarized from the other?” as the Bacon-Shakespeare mystery; that in intensity of scientific research if not of value, our case is on a par with that of our two great predecessors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., &#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence&#039;&#039; No. 130 (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 433. See [[Mahatma Letter No. 130#Page 13|Mahatma Letter No. 130 page 13]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Understanding by C. Jinarājadāsa==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;But there is a different vision possible and every cultured man and woman knows&lt;br /&gt;
something of it, for it is given to us by the great poets. For what makes a poet&lt;br /&gt;
is a larger vision and especially is the larger vision of man a characteristic&lt;br /&gt;
of the great poets. The great poet stands apart from mankind; you find that&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare, who looks at all men as if from a Mount Olympus, notes their&lt;br /&gt;
foibles and foolishnesses, and yet smiles on them all. There is the spirit of&lt;br /&gt;
the divine vision when he makes one of his characters say about another, &amp;quot; God&lt;br /&gt;
made him, and therefore let him pass for a man.&amp;quot; You will note that, wherever&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare deals with a villain, he has no kind of antipathy to him, whether it&lt;br /&gt;
is to Cassio or Iago; he makes his villain live his life and expound himself,&lt;br /&gt;
for Shakespeare has no resentment of the evil in the villain. Even in the case&lt;br /&gt;
of Falstaff, full of coarseness and trickery, Shakespeare sees the man as he is,&lt;br /&gt;
and there is no condemnatory judgement. A poet observes men as they are;&lt;br /&gt;
therefore we find in the poets a larger vision than that of which the ordinary&lt;br /&gt;
man is capable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Divine Vision&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 4-5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Interpretations by William Q. Judge==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The words of the immortal Shakespeare - &amp;quot;The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interrèd with their bones,&amp;quot; receive a striking exemplification under this doctrine. For, as the evil thoughts and deeds are the more material and therefore more firmly impacted into the Astral Light, while the good, being spiritual, easily fade out, we are in effect at the mercy of the evil done. And the Adepts assert that Shakespeare was, unconsciously to himself, inspired by one of their own number.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;Echoes of the Orient Vol. II&#039;&#039; (San Diego, CA: Point Loma Publications, 1987), 7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Shakespeare was right in saying that life is a play, for the great life of the soul is a drama, and each new life and rebirth another act in which we assume another part and put on a new dress, but all through it we are the self-same person. So instead of its being unjust, it&lt;br /&gt;
is perfect justice, and in no other manner could justice be preserved.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;The Ocean of Theosophy&#039;&#039; (Los Angeles, CA: The Theosophy Company, 1962), 74.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare also believed in the importance of seven in man and nature. [[H. P. Blavatsky]] recognizes that&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22630</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22630"/>
		<updated>2012-08-26T19:46:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Biography */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 23, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. Regarded as one of the greatest writes of histoy, Shakespeare&#039;s works are continously performed today. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
William Shakespeare was born on April 23, 1564 in Stratford-upon-Avon, to John Shakespeare and Mary Arden. He attended the King&#039;s New School in Stratford, which primarily taught Latin classics and literature. In 1582, William Shakespeare married Anne Hathaway, and had three children, Susanna, Hamnet, and Judith, in the following three years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the birth of his children, William Shakespeare began to act and write in London. He was part owner of the theatrical group, The Lord Chamberlain&#039;s Men, that performed his works. In 1599, The Lord Chamberlain&#039;s men built the Globe Theater on the River Thames to accomadate the larger audiences that Shakespeare&#039;s work attracted. With the death of Queen Elizabeth in 1603, King James I granted Shakespeare&#039;s theatrical group a royal patent and was changed to The King&#039;s Men.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare-Bacon Mystery==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I recall being present at one of these investigations when in some way&lt;br /&gt;
Francis Bacon&#039; s work came to be examined. Knowing who Bacon is today, as one of&lt;br /&gt;
the Adepts, Bishop Leadbeater felt that to investigate Bacon&#039; s affairs&lt;br /&gt;
clairvoyantly was like a piece of impertinence. But he did note that Bacon wrote&lt;br /&gt;
the plays that pass as Shakespeare&#039; s. However, what particularly drew my&lt;br /&gt;
attention at the time was not that fact, which was fairly obvious to me upon the&lt;br /&gt;
examination of the evidence, but rather something else which Bishop Leadbeater&lt;br /&gt;
noted on higher planes. If Bacon is Shakespeare, and also if several other works&lt;br /&gt;
passing under the names of other authors are also from Bacon&#039; s brain, then,&lt;br /&gt;
there must have been a terrific creative energy in Bacon at the time. Bishop&lt;br /&gt;
Leadbeater said that, as he watched, it was as if some wonderful ray from a&lt;br /&gt;
great creative centre on the inner planes had converged upon Bacon, so that he&lt;br /&gt;
threw off one work after another in the way of plays, poems, philosophical&lt;br /&gt;
theses, etc., without any particular effort. This little glimpse into the power&lt;br /&gt;
of the creative consciousness behind everything was far more fascinating to me&lt;br /&gt;
than the solution of the Bacon-Shakespeare problem.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Occult Investigations&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1938), 40-41.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A deeper truth than even he intended is involved in the words Lord Bacon used&lt;br /&gt;
(playing a part himself, and disguised as Shakespeare) when he said, &amp;quot;All the&lt;br /&gt;
world&#039;s a stage, and all the men and women merely players.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Nature&#039;s Mysteries&#039;&#039; (Krotona, CA: Theosophical Publishing House, 1918), 44.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] held Shakespeare in highest regard. The Introductory of [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]] begins with his words from &#039;&#039;Henry  V&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Gently to hear, kindly to judge.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), xvii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; She further states that &amp;quot;Shakespeare, was and will ever remain the intellectual &amp;quot;Sphinx&amp;quot; of the ages&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 419.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also makes numerous references to verses from Shakespeare&#039;s work in the Theosophical Magazine, [[Lucifer (periodical)|&#039;&#039;Lucifer&#039;&#039;]]. In her article, &amp;quot;Genius&amp;quot; (Volume V, No. 27, November 1889), Blavatsky wrote:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Perchance, in their unsophisticated wisdom, the philosophers of old were nearer truth than are our modern wiseacres, when they endowed man with a tutelar deity, a Spirit whom they called genius. The substance of this entity, to say nothing of its essence—observe the distinction, reader,—and the presence of both manifests itself according to the organism of the person it informs. As Shakespeare says of the genius of great men—what we perceive of his substance “is not here”—“For what you see is but the smallest part And least proportion of humanity: I tell you, madam, were the whole frame here, It is of such a spacious lofty pitch, Your roof were not sufficient to contain it.”* This is precisely what the Esoteric philosophy teaches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;Collected Writings Vol. XII&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1980), 14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare in the Mahatma Letters==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Shakespeare is also mentioned within the [[Mahatma letters]]. In [[ML129#Page 1|one of his letters]], [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] wrote, &amp;quot;My good friend — Shakespeare said truly that “our doubts are traitors.” Why should you doubt or create in your mind ever growing monsters?A little more knowledge in occult laws would have set your mind at rest long ago, avoided many a tear to your gentle lady and pang to yourself.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chin, Vicente Hao, Jr. &#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence&#039;&#039; (Quezon City, Philippines: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 116. See [[Mahatma Letter No. 129#Page 1|Mahatma Letter No. 129 page 1]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In another letter, Shakespeare is mentioned again within the context of the Shakespeare-Bacon mystery. [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] uses the Shakespeare-Bacon mystery as an analogy to the Kiddle-K. H. controversy.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;If fame is sweet to him why will he not be consoled with the thought that the case of the “Kiddle — K.H. parallel passages” has now become as much a cause célèbre in the department of “who is who,” and “which plagiarized from the other?” as the Bacon-Shakespeare mystery; that in intensity of scientific research if not of value, our case is on a par with that of our two great predecessors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., &#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence&#039;&#039; No. 130 (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 433. See [[Mahatma Letter No. 130#Page 13|Mahatma Letter No. 130 page 13]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Understanding by C. Jinarājadāsa==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;But there is a different vision possible and every cultured man and woman knows&lt;br /&gt;
something of it, for it is given to us by the great poets. For what makes a poet&lt;br /&gt;
is a larger vision and especially is the larger vision of man a characteristic&lt;br /&gt;
of the great poets. The great poet stands apart from mankind; you find that&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare, who looks at all men as if from a Mount Olympus, notes their&lt;br /&gt;
foibles and foolishnesses, and yet smiles on them all. There is the spirit of&lt;br /&gt;
the divine vision when he makes one of his characters say about another, &amp;quot; God&lt;br /&gt;
made him, and therefore let him pass for a man.&amp;quot; You will note that, wherever&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare deals with a villain, he has no kind of antipathy to him, whether it&lt;br /&gt;
is to Cassio or Iago; he makes his villain live his life and expound himself,&lt;br /&gt;
for Shakespeare has no resentment of the evil in the villain. Even in the case&lt;br /&gt;
of Falstaff, full of coarseness and trickery, Shakespeare sees the man as he is,&lt;br /&gt;
and there is no condemnatory judgement. A poet observes men as they are;&lt;br /&gt;
therefore we find in the poets a larger vision than that of which the ordinary&lt;br /&gt;
man is capable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Divine Vision&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 4-5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Interpretations by William Q. Judge==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The words of the immortal Shakespeare - &amp;quot;The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interrèd with their bones,&amp;quot; receive a striking exemplification under this doctrine. For, as the evil thoughts and deeds are the more material and therefore more firmly impacted into the Astral Light, while the good, being spiritual, easily fade out, we are in effect at the mercy of the evil done. And the Adepts assert that Shakespeare was, unconsciously to himself, inspired by one of their own number.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;Echoes of the Orient Vol. II&#039;&#039; (San Diego, CA: Point Loma Publications, 1987), 7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Shakespeare was right in saying that life is a play, for the great life of the soul is a drama, and each new life and rebirth another act in which we assume another part and put on a new dress, but all through it we are the self-same person. So instead of its being unjust, it&lt;br /&gt;
is perfect justice, and in no other manner could justice be preserved.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;The Ocean of Theosophy&#039;&#039; (Los Angeles, CA: The Theosophy Company, 1962), 74.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22629</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22629"/>
		<updated>2012-08-26T19:23:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Biography */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 23, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. Regarded as one of the greatest writes of histoy, Shakespeare&#039;s works are continously performed today. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
William Shakespeare was born on April 23, 1564 in Stratford-upon-Avon, to John Shakespeare and Mary Arden. He attended the King&#039;s New School in Stratford, which primarily taught Latin classics and literature. In 1582, William Shakespeare married Anne Hathaway, and had three children, Susanna, Hamnet, and Judith, in the following three years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare-Bacon Mystery==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I recall being present at one of these investigations when in some way&lt;br /&gt;
Francis Bacon&#039; s work came to be examined. Knowing who Bacon is today, as one of&lt;br /&gt;
the Adepts, Bishop Leadbeater felt that to investigate Bacon&#039; s affairs&lt;br /&gt;
clairvoyantly was like a piece of impertinence. But he did note that Bacon wrote&lt;br /&gt;
the plays that pass as Shakespeare&#039; s. However, what particularly drew my&lt;br /&gt;
attention at the time was not that fact, which was fairly obvious to me upon the&lt;br /&gt;
examination of the evidence, but rather something else which Bishop Leadbeater&lt;br /&gt;
noted on higher planes. If Bacon is Shakespeare, and also if several other works&lt;br /&gt;
passing under the names of other authors are also from Bacon&#039; s brain, then,&lt;br /&gt;
there must have been a terrific creative energy in Bacon at the time. Bishop&lt;br /&gt;
Leadbeater said that, as he watched, it was as if some wonderful ray from a&lt;br /&gt;
great creative centre on the inner planes had converged upon Bacon, so that he&lt;br /&gt;
threw off one work after another in the way of plays, poems, philosophical&lt;br /&gt;
theses, etc., without any particular effort. This little glimpse into the power&lt;br /&gt;
of the creative consciousness behind everything was far more fascinating to me&lt;br /&gt;
than the solution of the Bacon-Shakespeare problem.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Occult Investigations&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1938), 40-41.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A deeper truth than even he intended is involved in the words Lord Bacon used&lt;br /&gt;
(playing a part himself, and disguised as Shakespeare) when he said, &amp;quot;All the&lt;br /&gt;
world&#039;s a stage, and all the men and women merely players.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Nature&#039;s Mysteries&#039;&#039; (Krotona, CA: Theosophical Publishing House, 1918), 44.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] held Shakespeare in highest regard. The Introductory of [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]] begins with his words from &#039;&#039;Henry  V&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Gently to hear, kindly to judge.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), xvii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; She further states that &amp;quot;Shakespeare, was and will ever remain the intellectual &amp;quot;Sphinx&amp;quot; of the ages&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 419.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also makes numerous references to verses from Shakespeare&#039;s work in the Theosophical Magazine, [[Lucifer (periodical)|&#039;&#039;Lucifer&#039;&#039;]]. In her article, &amp;quot;Genius&amp;quot; (Volume V, No. 27, November 1889), Blavatsky wrote:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Perchance, in their unsophisticated wisdom, the philosophers of old were nearer truth than are our modern wiseacres, when they endowed man with a tutelar deity, a Spirit whom they called genius. The substance of this entity, to say nothing of its essence—observe the distinction, reader,—and the presence of both manifests itself according to the organism of the person it informs. As Shakespeare says of the genius of great men—what we perceive of his substance “is not here”—“For what you see is but the smallest part And least proportion of humanity: I tell you, madam, were the whole frame here, It is of such a spacious lofty pitch, Your roof were not sufficient to contain it.”* This is precisely what the Esoteric philosophy teaches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;Collected Writings Vol. XII&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1980), 14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare in the Mahatma Letters==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Shakespeare is also mentioned within the [[Mahatma letters]]. In [[ML129#Page 1|one of his letters]], [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] wrote, &amp;quot;My good friend — Shakespeare said truly that “our doubts are traitors.” Why should you doubt or create in your mind ever growing monsters?A little more knowledge in occult laws would have set your mind at rest long ago, avoided many a tear to your gentle lady and pang to yourself.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chin, Vicente Hao, Jr. &#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence&#039;&#039; (Quezon City, Philippines: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 116. See [[Mahatma Letter No. 129#Page 1|Mahatma Letter No. 129 page 1]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In another letter, Shakespeare is mentioned again within the context of the Shakespeare-Bacon mystery. [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] uses the Shakespeare-Bacon mystery as an analogy to the Kiddle-K. H. controversy.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;If fame is sweet to him why will he not be consoled with the thought that the case of the “Kiddle — K.H. parallel passages” has now become as much a cause célèbre in the department of “who is who,” and “which plagiarized from the other?” as the Bacon-Shakespeare mystery; that in intensity of scientific research if not of value, our case is on a par with that of our two great predecessors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., &#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence&#039;&#039; No. 130 (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 433. See [[Mahatma Letter No. 130#Page 13|Mahatma Letter No. 130 page 13]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Understanding by C. Jinarājadāsa==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;But there is a different vision possible and every cultured man and woman knows&lt;br /&gt;
something of it, for it is given to us by the great poets. For what makes a poet&lt;br /&gt;
is a larger vision and especially is the larger vision of man a characteristic&lt;br /&gt;
of the great poets. The great poet stands apart from mankind; you find that&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare, who looks at all men as if from a Mount Olympus, notes their&lt;br /&gt;
foibles and foolishnesses, and yet smiles on them all. There is the spirit of&lt;br /&gt;
the divine vision when he makes one of his characters say about another, &amp;quot; God&lt;br /&gt;
made him, and therefore let him pass for a man.&amp;quot; You will note that, wherever&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare deals with a villain, he has no kind of antipathy to him, whether it&lt;br /&gt;
is to Cassio or Iago; he makes his villain live his life and expound himself,&lt;br /&gt;
for Shakespeare has no resentment of the evil in the villain. Even in the case&lt;br /&gt;
of Falstaff, full of coarseness and trickery, Shakespeare sees the man as he is,&lt;br /&gt;
and there is no condemnatory judgement. A poet observes men as they are;&lt;br /&gt;
therefore we find in the poets a larger vision than that of which the ordinary&lt;br /&gt;
man is capable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Divine Vision&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 4-5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Interpretations by William Q. Judge==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The words of the immortal Shakespeare - &amp;quot;The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interrèd with their bones,&amp;quot; receive a striking exemplification under this doctrine. For, as the evil thoughts and deeds are the more material and therefore more firmly impacted into the Astral Light, while the good, being spiritual, easily fade out, we are in effect at the mercy of the evil done. And the Adepts assert that Shakespeare was, unconsciously to himself, inspired by one of their own number.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;Echoes of the Orient Vol. II&#039;&#039; (San Diego, CA: Point Loma Publications, 1987), 7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Shakespeare was right in saying that life is a play, for the great life of the soul is a drama, and each new life and rebirth another act in which we assume another part and put on a new dress, but all through it we are the self-same person. So instead of its being unjust, it&lt;br /&gt;
is perfect justice, and in no other manner could justice be preserved.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;The Ocean of Theosophy&#039;&#039; (Los Angeles, CA: The Theosophy Company, 1962), 74.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22628</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22628"/>
		<updated>2012-08-26T19:16:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 23, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. Regarded as one of the greatest writes of histoy, Shakespeare&#039;s works are continously performed today. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
William Shakespeare was born on April 23, 1564 in Stratford-upon-Avon, to John Shakespeare and Mary Arden. He attended the King&#039;s New School in Stratford, which primarily taught Latin literature and classics.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare-Bacon Mystery==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I recall being present at one of these investigations when in some way&lt;br /&gt;
Francis Bacon&#039; s work came to be examined. Knowing who Bacon is today, as one of&lt;br /&gt;
the Adepts, Bishop Leadbeater felt that to investigate Bacon&#039; s affairs&lt;br /&gt;
clairvoyantly was like a piece of impertinence. But he did note that Bacon wrote&lt;br /&gt;
the plays that pass as Shakespeare&#039; s. However, what particularly drew my&lt;br /&gt;
attention at the time was not that fact, which was fairly obvious to me upon the&lt;br /&gt;
examination of the evidence, but rather something else which Bishop Leadbeater&lt;br /&gt;
noted on higher planes. If Bacon is Shakespeare, and also if several other works&lt;br /&gt;
passing under the names of other authors are also from Bacon&#039; s brain, then,&lt;br /&gt;
there must have been a terrific creative energy in Bacon at the time. Bishop&lt;br /&gt;
Leadbeater said that, as he watched, it was as if some wonderful ray from a&lt;br /&gt;
great creative centre on the inner planes had converged upon Bacon, so that he&lt;br /&gt;
threw off one work after another in the way of plays, poems, philosophical&lt;br /&gt;
theses, etc., without any particular effort. This little glimpse into the power&lt;br /&gt;
of the creative consciousness behind everything was far more fascinating to me&lt;br /&gt;
than the solution of the Bacon-Shakespeare problem.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Occult Investigations&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1938), 40-41.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A deeper truth than even he intended is involved in the words Lord Bacon used&lt;br /&gt;
(playing a part himself, and disguised as Shakespeare) when he said, &amp;quot;All the&lt;br /&gt;
world&#039;s a stage, and all the men and women merely players.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Nature&#039;s Mysteries&#039;&#039; (Krotona, CA: Theosophical Publishing House, 1918), 44.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] held Shakespeare in highest regard. The Introductory of [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]] begins with his words from &#039;&#039;Henry  V&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Gently to hear, kindly to judge.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), xvii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; She further states that &amp;quot;Shakespeare, was and will ever remain the intellectual &amp;quot;Sphinx&amp;quot; of the ages&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 419.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also makes numerous references to verses from Shakespeare&#039;s work in the Theosophical Magazine, [[Lucifer (periodical)|&#039;&#039;Lucifer&#039;&#039;]]. In her article, &amp;quot;Genius&amp;quot; (Volume V, No. 27, November 1889), Blavatsky wrote:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Perchance, in their unsophisticated wisdom, the philosophers of old were nearer truth than are our modern wiseacres, when they endowed man with a tutelar deity, a Spirit whom they called genius. The substance of this entity, to say nothing of its essence—observe the distinction, reader,—and the presence of both manifests itself according to the organism of the person it informs. As Shakespeare says of the genius of great men—what we perceive of his substance “is not here”—“For what you see is but the smallest part And least proportion of humanity: I tell you, madam, were the whole frame here, It is of such a spacious lofty pitch, Your roof were not sufficient to contain it.”* This is precisely what the Esoteric philosophy teaches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;Collected Writings Vol. XII&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1980), 14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare in the Mahatma Letters==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Shakespeare is also mentioned within the [[Mahatma letters]]. In [[ML129#Page 1|one of his letters]], [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] wrote, &amp;quot;My good friend — Shakespeare said truly that “our doubts are traitors.” Why should you doubt or create in your mind ever growing monsters?A little more knowledge in occult laws would have set your mind at rest long ago, avoided many a tear to your gentle lady and pang to yourself.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chin, Vicente Hao, Jr. &#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence&#039;&#039; (Quezon City, Philippines: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 116. See [[Mahatma Letter No. 129#Page 1|Mahatma Letter No. 129 page 1]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In another letter, Shakespeare is mentioned again within the context of the Shakespeare-Bacon mystery. [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] uses the Shakespeare-Bacon mystery as an analogy to the Kiddle-K. H. controversy.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;If fame is sweet to him why will he not be consoled with the thought that the case of the “Kiddle — K.H. parallel passages” has now become as much a cause célèbre in the department of “who is who,” and “which plagiarized from the other?” as the Bacon-Shakespeare mystery; that in intensity of scientific research if not of value, our case is on a par with that of our two great predecessors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., &#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence&#039;&#039; No. 130 (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 433. See [[Mahatma Letter No. 130#Page 13|Mahatma Letter No. 130 page 13]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Understanding by C. Jinarājadāsa==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;But there is a different vision possible and every cultured man and woman knows&lt;br /&gt;
something of it, for it is given to us by the great poets. For what makes a poet&lt;br /&gt;
is a larger vision and especially is the larger vision of man a characteristic&lt;br /&gt;
of the great poets. The great poet stands apart from mankind; you find that&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare, who looks at all men as if from a Mount Olympus, notes their&lt;br /&gt;
foibles and foolishnesses, and yet smiles on them all. There is the spirit of&lt;br /&gt;
the divine vision when he makes one of his characters say about another, &amp;quot; God&lt;br /&gt;
made him, and therefore let him pass for a man.&amp;quot; You will note that, wherever&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare deals with a villain, he has no kind of antipathy to him, whether it&lt;br /&gt;
is to Cassio or Iago; he makes his villain live his life and expound himself,&lt;br /&gt;
for Shakespeare has no resentment of the evil in the villain. Even in the case&lt;br /&gt;
of Falstaff, full of coarseness and trickery, Shakespeare sees the man as he is,&lt;br /&gt;
and there is no condemnatory judgement. A poet observes men as they are;&lt;br /&gt;
therefore we find in the poets a larger vision than that of which the ordinary&lt;br /&gt;
man is capable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Divine Vision&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 4-5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Interpretations by William Q. Judge==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The words of the immortal Shakespeare - &amp;quot;The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interrèd with their bones,&amp;quot; receive a striking exemplification under this doctrine. For, as the evil thoughts and deeds are the more material and therefore more firmly impacted into the Astral Light, while the good, being spiritual, easily fade out, we are in effect at the mercy of the evil done. And the Adepts assert that Shakespeare was, unconsciously to himself, inspired by one of their own number.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;Echoes of the Orient Vol. II&#039;&#039; (San Diego, CA: Point Loma Publications, 1987), 7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Shakespeare was right in saying that life is a play, for the great life of the soul is a drama, and each new life and rebirth another act in which we assume another part and put on a new dress, but all through it we are the self-same person. So instead of its being unjust, it&lt;br /&gt;
is perfect justice, and in no other manner could justice be preserved.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;The Ocean of Theosophy&#039;&#039; (Los Angeles, CA: The Theosophy Company, 1962), 74.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22627</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22627"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T21:49:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Shakespeare in the Mahatma Letters */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare-Bacon Mystery==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I recall being present at one of these investigations when in some way&lt;br /&gt;
Francis Bacon&#039; s work came to be examined. Knowing who Bacon is today, as one of&lt;br /&gt;
the Adepts, Bishop Leadbeater felt that to investigate Bacon&#039; s affairs&lt;br /&gt;
clairvoyantly was like a piece of impertinence. But he did note that Bacon wrote&lt;br /&gt;
the plays that pass as Shakespeare&#039; s. However, what particularly drew my&lt;br /&gt;
attention at the time was not that fact, which was fairly obvious to me upon the&lt;br /&gt;
examination of the evidence, but rather something else which Bishop Leadbeater&lt;br /&gt;
noted on higher planes. If Bacon is Shakespeare, and also if several other works&lt;br /&gt;
passing under the names of other authors are also from Bacon&#039; s brain, then,&lt;br /&gt;
there must have been a terrific creative energy in Bacon at the time. Bishop&lt;br /&gt;
Leadbeater said that, as he watched, it was as if some wonderful ray from a&lt;br /&gt;
great creative centre on the inner planes had converged upon Bacon, so that he&lt;br /&gt;
threw off one work after another in the way of plays, poems, philosophical&lt;br /&gt;
theses, etc., without any particular effort. This little glimpse into the power&lt;br /&gt;
of the creative consciousness behind everything was far more fascinating to me&lt;br /&gt;
than the solution of the Bacon-Shakespeare problem.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Occult Investigations&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1938), 40-41.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A deeper truth than even he intended is involved in the words Lord Bacon used&lt;br /&gt;
(playing a part himself, and disguised as Shakespeare) when he said, &amp;quot;All the&lt;br /&gt;
world&#039;s a stage, and all the men and women merely players.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Nature&#039;s Mysteries&#039;&#039; (Krotona, CA: Theosophical Publishing House, 1918), 44.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] held Shakespeare in highest regard. The Introductory of [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]] begins with his words from &#039;&#039;Henry  V&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Gently to hear, kindly to judge.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), xvii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; She further states that &amp;quot;Shakespeare, was and will ever remain the intellectual &amp;quot;Sphinx&amp;quot; of the ages&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 419.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also makes numerous references to verses from Shakespeare&#039;s work in the Theosophical Magazine, [[Lucifer (periodical)|&#039;&#039;Lucifer&#039;&#039;]]. In her article, &amp;quot;Genius&amp;quot; (Volume V, No. 27, November 1889), Blavatsky wrote:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Perchance, in their unsophisticated wisdom, the philosophers of old were nearer truth than are our modern wiseacres, when they endowed man with a tutelar deity, a Spirit whom they called genius. The substance of this entity, to say nothing of its essence—observe the distinction, reader,—and the presence of both manifests itself according to the organism of the person it informs. As Shakespeare says of the genius of great men—what we perceive of his substance “is not here”—“For what you see is but the smallest part And least proportion of humanity: I tell you, madam, were the whole frame here, It is of such a spacious lofty pitch, Your roof were not sufficient to contain it.”* This is precisely what the Esoteric philosophy teaches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;Collected Writings Vol. XII&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1980), 14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare in the Mahatma Letters==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Shakespeare is also mentioned within the [[Mahatma letters]]. In [[ML129#Page 1|one of his letters]], [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] wrote, &amp;quot;My good friend — Shakespeare said truly that “our doubts are traitors.” Why should you doubt or create in your mind ever growing monsters?A little more knowledge in occult laws would have set your mind at rest long ago, avoided many a tear to your gentle lady and pang to yourself.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chin, Vicente Hao, Jr. &#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence&#039;&#039; (Quezon City, Philippines: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 116. See [[Mahatma Letter No. 129#Page 1|Mahatma Letter No. 129 page 1]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In another letter, Shakespeare is mentioned again within the context of the Shakespeare-Bacon mystery. [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] uses the Shakespeare-Bacon mystery as an analogy to the Kiddle-K. H. controversy.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;If fame is sweet to him why will he not be consoled with the thought that the case of the “Kiddle — K.H. parallel passages” has now become as much a cause célèbre in the department of “who is who,” and “which plagiarized from the other?” as the Bacon-Shakespeare mystery; that in intensity of scientific research if not of value, our case is on a par with that of our two great predecessors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., &#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence&#039;&#039; No. 130 (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 433. See [[Mahatma Letter No. 130#Page 13|Mahatma Letter No. 130 page 13]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Understanding by C. Jinarājadāsa==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;But there is a different vision possible and every cultured man and woman knows&lt;br /&gt;
something of it, for it is given to us by the great poets. For what makes a poet&lt;br /&gt;
is a larger vision and especially is the larger vision of man a characteristic&lt;br /&gt;
of the great poets. The great poet stands apart from mankind; you find that&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare, who looks at all men as if from a Mount Olympus, notes their&lt;br /&gt;
foibles and foolishnesses, and yet smiles on them all. There is the spirit of&lt;br /&gt;
the divine vision when he makes one of his characters say about another, &amp;quot; God&lt;br /&gt;
made him, and therefore let him pass for a man.&amp;quot; You will note that, wherever&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare deals with a villain, he has no kind of antipathy to him, whether it&lt;br /&gt;
is to Cassio or Iago; he makes his villain live his life and expound himself,&lt;br /&gt;
for Shakespeare has no resentment of the evil in the villain. Even in the case&lt;br /&gt;
of Falstaff, full of coarseness and trickery, Shakespeare sees the man as he is,&lt;br /&gt;
and there is no condemnatory judgement. A poet observes men as they are;&lt;br /&gt;
therefore we find in the poets a larger vision than that of which the ordinary&lt;br /&gt;
man is capable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Divine Vision&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 4-5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Interpretations by William Q. Judge==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The words of the immortal Shakespeare - &amp;quot;The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interrèd with their bones,&amp;quot; receive a striking exemplification under this doctrine. For, as the evil thoughts and deeds are the more material and therefore more firmly impacted into the Astral Light, while the good, being spiritual, easily fade out, we are in effect at the mercy of the evil done. And the Adepts assert that Shakespeare was, unconsciously to himself, inspired by one of their own number.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;Echoes of the Orient Vol. II&#039;&#039; (San Diego, CA: Point Loma Publications, 1987), 7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Shakespeare was right in saying that life is a play, for the great life of the soul is a drama, and each new life and rebirth another act in which we assume another part and put on a new dress, but all through it we are the self-same person. So instead of its being unjust, it&lt;br /&gt;
is perfect justice, and in no other manner could justice be preserved.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;The Ocean of Theosophy&#039;&#039; (Los Angeles, CA: The Theosophy Company, 1962), 74.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22626</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22626"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T21:36:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare-Bacon Mystery==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I recall being present at one of these investigations when in some way&lt;br /&gt;
Francis Bacon&#039; s work came to be examined. Knowing who Bacon is today, as one of&lt;br /&gt;
the Adepts, Bishop Leadbeater felt that to investigate Bacon&#039; s affairs&lt;br /&gt;
clairvoyantly was like a piece of impertinence. But he did note that Bacon wrote&lt;br /&gt;
the plays that pass as Shakespeare&#039; s. However, what particularly drew my&lt;br /&gt;
attention at the time was not that fact, which was fairly obvious to me upon the&lt;br /&gt;
examination of the evidence, but rather something else which Bishop Leadbeater&lt;br /&gt;
noted on higher planes. If Bacon is Shakespeare, and also if several other works&lt;br /&gt;
passing under the names of other authors are also from Bacon&#039; s brain, then,&lt;br /&gt;
there must have been a terrific creative energy in Bacon at the time. Bishop&lt;br /&gt;
Leadbeater said that, as he watched, it was as if some wonderful ray from a&lt;br /&gt;
great creative centre on the inner planes had converged upon Bacon, so that he&lt;br /&gt;
threw off one work after another in the way of plays, poems, philosophical&lt;br /&gt;
theses, etc., without any particular effort. This little glimpse into the power&lt;br /&gt;
of the creative consciousness behind everything was far more fascinating to me&lt;br /&gt;
than the solution of the Bacon-Shakespeare problem.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Occult Investigations&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1938), 40-41.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A deeper truth than even he intended is involved in the words Lord Bacon used&lt;br /&gt;
(playing a part himself, and disguised as Shakespeare) when he said, &amp;quot;All the&lt;br /&gt;
world&#039;s a stage, and all the men and women merely players.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Nature&#039;s Mysteries&#039;&#039; (Krotona, CA: Theosophical Publishing House, 1918), 44.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] held Shakespeare in highest regard. The Introductory of [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]] begins with his words from &#039;&#039;Henry  V&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Gently to hear, kindly to judge.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), xvii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; She further states that &amp;quot;Shakespeare, was and will ever remain the intellectual &amp;quot;Sphinx&amp;quot; of the ages&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 419.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also makes numerous references to verses from Shakespeare&#039;s work in the Theosophical Magazine, [[Lucifer (periodical)|&#039;&#039;Lucifer&#039;&#039;]]. In her article, &amp;quot;Genius&amp;quot; (Volume V, No. 27, November 1889), Blavatsky wrote:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Perchance, in their unsophisticated wisdom, the philosophers of old were nearer truth than are our modern wiseacres, when they endowed man with a tutelar deity, a Spirit whom they called genius. The substance of this entity, to say nothing of its essence—observe the distinction, reader,—and the presence of both manifests itself according to the organism of the person it informs. As Shakespeare says of the genius of great men—what we perceive of his substance “is not here”—“For what you see is but the smallest part And least proportion of humanity: I tell you, madam, were the whole frame here, It is of such a spacious lofty pitch, Your roof were not sufficient to contain it.”* This is precisely what the Esoteric philosophy teaches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;Collected Writings Vol. XII&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1980), 14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare in the Mahatma Letters==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Shakespeare is also mentioned within the [[Mahatma letters]]. In [[ML129#Page 1|one of his letters]], [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] wrote, &amp;quot;My good friend — Shakespeare said truly that “our doubts are traitors.” Why should you doubt or create in your mind ever growing monsters?A little more knowledge in occult laws would have set your mind at rest long ago, avoided many a tear to your gentle lady and pang to yourself.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chin, Vicente Hao, Jr. &#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence&#039;&#039; (Quezon City, Philippines: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 116. See [[Mahatma Letter No. 129#Page 1|Mahatma Letter No. 129 page 1]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;If fame is sweet to him why will he not be consoled with the thought that the case of the “Kiddle — K.H. parallel passages” has now become as much a cause célèbre in the department of “who is who,” and “which plagiarized from the other?” as the Bacon-Shakespeare mystery; that in intensity of scientific research if not of value, our case is on a par with that of our two great predecessors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., &#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence&#039;&#039; No. 130 (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 433. See [[Mahatma Letter No. 130#Page 13|Mahatma Letter No. 130 page 13]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Understanding by C. Jinarājadāsa==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;But there is a different vision possible and every cultured man and woman knows&lt;br /&gt;
something of it, for it is given to us by the great poets. For what makes a poet&lt;br /&gt;
is a larger vision and especially is the larger vision of man a characteristic&lt;br /&gt;
of the great poets. The great poet stands apart from mankind; you find that&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare, who looks at all men as if from a Mount Olympus, notes their&lt;br /&gt;
foibles and foolishnesses, and yet smiles on them all. There is the spirit of&lt;br /&gt;
the divine vision when he makes one of his characters say about another, &amp;quot; God&lt;br /&gt;
made him, and therefore let him pass for a man.&amp;quot; You will note that, wherever&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare deals with a villain, he has no kind of antipathy to him, whether it&lt;br /&gt;
is to Cassio or Iago; he makes his villain live his life and expound himself,&lt;br /&gt;
for Shakespeare has no resentment of the evil in the villain. Even in the case&lt;br /&gt;
of Falstaff, full of coarseness and trickery, Shakespeare sees the man as he is,&lt;br /&gt;
and there is no condemnatory judgement. A poet observes men as they are;&lt;br /&gt;
therefore we find in the poets a larger vision than that of which the ordinary&lt;br /&gt;
man is capable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Divine Vision&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 4-5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Interpretations by William Q. Judge==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The words of the immortal Shakespeare - &amp;quot;The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interrèd with their bones,&amp;quot; receive a striking exemplification under this doctrine. For, as the evil thoughts and deeds are the more material and therefore more firmly impacted into the Astral Light, while the good, being spiritual, easily fade out, we are in effect at the mercy of the evil done. And the Adepts assert that Shakespeare was, unconsciously to himself, inspired by one of their own number.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;Echoes of the Orient Vol. II&#039;&#039; (San Diego, CA: Point Loma Publications, 1987), 7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Shakespeare was right in saying that life is a play, for the great life of the soul is a drama, and each new life and rebirth another act in which we assume another part and put on a new dress, but all through it we are the self-same person. So instead of its being unjust, it&lt;br /&gt;
is perfect justice, and in no other manner could justice be preserved.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;The Ocean of Theosophy&#039;&#039; (Los Angeles, CA: The Theosophy Company, 1962), 74.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22625</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22625"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T21:35:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Shakespeare-Bacon Mystery */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare-Bacon Mystery==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I recall being present at one of these investigations when in some way&lt;br /&gt;
Francis Bacon&#039; s work came to be examined. Knowing who Bacon is today, as one of&lt;br /&gt;
the Adepts, Bishop Leadbeater felt that to investigate Bacon&#039; s affairs&lt;br /&gt;
clairvoyantly was like a piece of impertinence. But he did note that Bacon wrote&lt;br /&gt;
the plays that pass as Shakespeare&#039; s. However, what particularly drew my&lt;br /&gt;
attention at the time was not that fact, which was fairly obvious to me upon the&lt;br /&gt;
examination of the evidence, but rather something else which Bishop Leadbeater&lt;br /&gt;
noted on higher planes. If Bacon is Shakespeare, and also if several other works&lt;br /&gt;
passing under the names of other authors are also from Bacon&#039; s brain, then,&lt;br /&gt;
there must have been a terrific creative energy in Bacon at the time. Bishop&lt;br /&gt;
Leadbeater said that, as he watched, it was as if some wonderful ray from a&lt;br /&gt;
great creative centre on the inner planes had converged upon Bacon, so that he&lt;br /&gt;
threw off one work after another in the way of plays, poems, philosophical&lt;br /&gt;
theses, etc., without any particular effort. This little glimpse into the power&lt;br /&gt;
of the creative consciousness behind everything was far more fascinating to me&lt;br /&gt;
than the solution of the Bacon-Shakespeare problem.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Occult Investigations&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1938), 40-41.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A deeper truth than even he intended is involved in the words Lord Bacon used&lt;br /&gt;
(playing a part himself, and disguised as Shakespeare) when he said, &amp;quot;All the&lt;br /&gt;
world&#039;s a stage, and all the men and women merely players.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Nature&#039;s Mysteries&#039;&#039; (Krotona, CA: Theosophical Publishing House, 1918), 44.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] held Shakespeare in highest regard. The Introductory of [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]] begins with his words from &#039;&#039;Henry  V&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Gently to hear, kindly to judge.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), xvii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; She further states that &amp;quot;Shakespeare, was and will ever remain the intellectual &amp;quot;Sphinx&amp;quot; of the ages&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 419.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also makes numerous references to verses from Shakespeare&#039;s work in the Theosophical Magazine, [[Lucifer (periodical)|&#039;&#039;Lucifer&#039;&#039;]]. In her article, &amp;quot;Genius&amp;quot; (Volume V, No. 27, November 1889), Blavatsky wrote:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Perchance, in their unsophisticated wisdom, the philosophers of old were nearer truth than are our modern wiseacres, when they endowed man with a tutelar deity, a Spirit whom they called genius. The substance of this entity, to say nothing of its essence—observe the distinction, reader,—and the presence of both manifests itself according to the organism of the person it informs. As Shakespeare says of the genius of great men—what we perceive of his substance “is not here”—“For what you see is but the smallest part And least proportion of humanity: I tell you, madam, were the whole frame here, It is of such a spacious lofty pitch, Your roof were not sufficient to contain it.”* This is precisely what the Esoteric philosophy teaches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;Collected Writings Vol. XII&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1980), 14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare in the Mahatma Letters==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Shakespeare is also mentioned within the [[Mahatma letters]]. In [[ML129#Page 1|one of his letters]], [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] wrote, &amp;quot;My good friend — Shakespeare said truly that “our doubts are traitors.” Why should you doubt or create in your mind ever growing monsters?A little more knowledge in occult laws would have set your mind at rest long ago, avoided many a tear to your gentle lady and pang to yourself.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chin, Vicente Hao, Jr. &#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence&#039;&#039; (Quezon City, Philippines: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 116. See [[Mahatma Letter No. 129#Page 1|Mahatma Letter No. 129 page 1]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;If fame is sweet to him why will he not be consoled with the thought that the case of the “Kiddle — K.H. parallel passages” has now become as much a cause célèbre in the department of “who is who,” and “which plagiarized from the other?” as the Bacon-Shakespeare mystery; that in intensity of scientific research if not of value, our case is on a par with that of our two great predecessors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., &#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence&#039;&#039; No. 130 (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 433. See [[Mahatma Letter No. 130#Page 13|Mahatma Letter No. 130 page 13]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare and C. Jinarājadāsa==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;But there is a different vision possible and every cultured man and woman knows&lt;br /&gt;
something of it, for it is given to us by the great poets. For what makes a poet&lt;br /&gt;
is a larger vision and especially is the larger vision of man a characteristic&lt;br /&gt;
of the great poets. The great poet stands apart from mankind; you find that&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare, who looks at all men as if from a Mount Olympus, notes their&lt;br /&gt;
foibles and foolishnesses, and yet smiles on them all. There is the spirit of&lt;br /&gt;
the divine vision when he makes one of his characters say about another, &amp;quot; God&lt;br /&gt;
made him, and therefore let him pass for a man.&amp;quot; You will note that, wherever&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare deals with a villain, he has no kind of antipathy to him, whether it&lt;br /&gt;
is to Cassio or Iago; he makes his villain live his life and expound himself,&lt;br /&gt;
for Shakespeare has no resentment of the evil in the villain. Even in the case&lt;br /&gt;
of Falstaff, full of coarseness and trickery, Shakespeare sees the man as he is,&lt;br /&gt;
and there is no condemnatory judgement. A poet observes men as they are;&lt;br /&gt;
therefore we find in the poets a larger vision than that of which the ordinary&lt;br /&gt;
man is capable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Divine Vision&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 4-5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Interpretations by William Q. Judge==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The words of the immortal Shakespeare - &amp;quot;The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interrèd with their bones,&amp;quot; receive a striking exemplification under this doctrine. For, as the evil thoughts and deeds are the more material and therefore more firmly impacted into the Astral Light, while the good, being spiritual, easily fade out, we are in effect at the mercy of the evil done. And the Adepts assert that Shakespeare was, unconsciously to himself, inspired by one of their own number.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;Echoes of the Orient Vol. II&#039;&#039; (San Diego, CA: Point Loma Publications, 1987), 7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Shakespeare was right in saying that life is a play, for the great life of the soul is a drama, and each new life and rebirth another act in which we assume another part and put on a new dress, but all through it we are the self-same person. So instead of its being unjust, it&lt;br /&gt;
is perfect justice, and in no other manner could justice be preserved.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;The Ocean of Theosophy&#039;&#039; (Los Angeles, CA: The Theosophy Company, 1962), 74.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22624</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22624"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T21:15:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare-Bacon Mystery==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] held Shakespeare in highest regard. The Introductory of [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]] begins with his words from &#039;&#039;Henry  V&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Gently to hear, kindly to judge.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), xvii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; She further states that &amp;quot;Shakespeare, was and will ever remain the intellectual &amp;quot;Sphinx&amp;quot; of the ages&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 419.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also makes numerous references to verses from Shakespeare&#039;s work in the Theosophical Magazine, [[Lucifer (periodical)|&#039;&#039;Lucifer&#039;&#039;]]. In her article, &amp;quot;Genius&amp;quot; (Volume V, No. 27, November 1889), Blavatsky wrote:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Perchance, in their unsophisticated wisdom, the philosophers of old were nearer truth than are our modern wiseacres, when they endowed man with a tutelar deity, a Spirit whom they called genius. The substance of this entity, to say nothing of its essence—observe the distinction, reader,—and the presence of both manifests itself according to the organism of the person it informs. As Shakespeare says of the genius of great men—what we perceive of his substance “is not here”—“For what you see is but the smallest part And least proportion of humanity: I tell you, madam, were the whole frame here, It is of such a spacious lofty pitch, Your roof were not sufficient to contain it.”* This is precisely what the Esoteric philosophy teaches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;Collected Writings Vol. XII&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1980), 14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare in the Mahatma Letters==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Shakespeare is also mentioned within the [[Mahatma letters]]. In [[ML129#Page 1|one of his letters]], [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] wrote, &amp;quot;My good friend — Shakespeare said truly that “our doubts are traitors.” Why should you doubt or create in your mind ever growing monsters?A little more knowledge in occult laws would have set your mind at rest long ago, avoided many a tear to your gentle lady and pang to yourself.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chin, Vicente Hao, Jr. &#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence&#039;&#039; (Quezon City, Philippines: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 116. See [[Mahatma Letter No. 129#Page 1|Mahatma Letter No. 129 page 1]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;If fame is sweet to him why will he not be consoled with the thought that the case of the “Kiddle — K.H. parallel passages” has now become as much a cause célèbre in the department of “who is who,” and “which plagiarized from the other?” as the Bacon-Shakespeare mystery; that in intensity of scientific research if not of value, our case is on a par with that of our two great predecessors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., &#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence&#039;&#039; No. 130 (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 433. See [[Mahatma Letter No. 130#Page 13|Mahatma Letter No. 130 page 13]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare and C. Jinarājadāsa==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;But there is a different vision possible and every cultured man and woman knows&lt;br /&gt;
something of it, for it is given to us by the great poets. For what makes a poet&lt;br /&gt;
is a larger vision and especially is the larger vision of man a characteristic&lt;br /&gt;
of the great poets. The great poet stands apart from mankind; you find that&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare, who looks at all men as if from a Mount Olympus, notes their&lt;br /&gt;
foibles and foolishnesses, and yet smiles on them all. There is the spirit of&lt;br /&gt;
the divine vision when he makes one of his characters say about another, &amp;quot; God&lt;br /&gt;
made him, and therefore let him pass for a man.&amp;quot; You will note that, wherever&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare deals with a villain, he has no kind of antipathy to him, whether it&lt;br /&gt;
is to Cassio or Iago; he makes his villain live his life and expound himself,&lt;br /&gt;
for Shakespeare has no resentment of the evil in the villain. Even in the case&lt;br /&gt;
of Falstaff, full of coarseness and trickery, Shakespeare sees the man as he is,&lt;br /&gt;
and there is no condemnatory judgement. A poet observes men as they are;&lt;br /&gt;
therefore we find in the poets a larger vision than that of which the ordinary&lt;br /&gt;
man is capable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Divine Vision&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 4-5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Interpretations by William Q. Judge==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The words of the immortal Shakespeare - &amp;quot;The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interrèd with their bones,&amp;quot; receive a striking exemplification under this doctrine. For, as the evil thoughts and deeds are the more material and therefore more firmly impacted into the Astral Light, while the good, being spiritual, easily fade out, we are in effect at the mercy of the evil done. And the Adepts assert that Shakespeare was, unconsciously to himself, inspired by one of their own number.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;Echoes of the Orient Vol. II&#039;&#039; (San Diego, CA: Point Loma Publications, 1987), 7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Shakespeare was right in saying that life is a play, for the great life of the soul is a drama, and each new life and rebirth another act in which we assume another part and put on a new dress, but all through it we are the self-same person. So instead of its being unjust, it&lt;br /&gt;
is perfect justice, and in no other manner could justice be preserved.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;The Ocean of Theosophy&#039;&#039; (Los Angeles, CA: The Theosophy Company, 1962), 74.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22623</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22623"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T21:07:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] held Shakespeare in highest regard. The Introductory of [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]] begins with his words from &#039;&#039;Henry  V&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Gently to hear, kindly to judge.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), xvii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; She further states that &amp;quot;Shakespeare, was and will ever remain the intellectual &amp;quot;Sphinx&amp;quot; of the ages&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 419.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also makes numerous references to verses from Shakespeare&#039;s work in the Theosophical Magazine, [[Lucifer (periodical)|&#039;&#039;Lucifer&#039;&#039;]]. In her article, &amp;quot;Genius&amp;quot; (Volume V, No. 27, November 1889), Blavatsky wrote:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Perchance, in their unsophisticated wisdom, the philosophers of old were nearer truth than are our modern wiseacres, when they endowed man with a tutelar deity, a Spirit whom they called genius. The substance of this entity, to say nothing of its essence—observe the distinction, reader,—and the presence of both manifests itself according to the organism of the person it informs. As Shakespeare says of the genius of great men—what we perceive of his substance “is not here”—“For what you see is but the smallest part And least proportion of humanity: I tell you, madam, were the whole frame here, It is of such a spacious lofty pitch, Your roof were not sufficient to contain it.”* This is precisely what the Esoteric philosophy teaches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;Collected Writings Vol. XII&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1980), 14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare in the Mahatma Letters==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Shakespeare is also mentioned within the [[Mahatma letters]]. In [[ML129#Page 1|one of his letters]], [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] wrote, &amp;quot;My good friend — Shakespeare said truly that “our doubts are traitors.” Why should you doubt or create in your mind ever growing monsters?A little more knowledge in occult laws would have set your mind at rest long ago, avoided many a tear to your gentle lady and pang to yourself.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chin, Vicente Hao, Jr. &#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence&#039;&#039; (Quezon City, Philippines: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 116. See [[Mahatma Letter No. 129#Page 1|Mahatma Letter No. 129 page 1]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare and C. Jinarājadāsa==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;But there is a different vision possible and every cultured man and woman knows&lt;br /&gt;
something of it, for it is given to us by the great poets. For what makes a poet&lt;br /&gt;
is a larger vision and especially is the larger vision of man a characteristic&lt;br /&gt;
of the great poets. The great poet stands apart from mankind; you find that&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare, who looks at all men as if from a Mount Olympus, notes their&lt;br /&gt;
foibles and foolishnesses, and yet smiles on them all. There is the spirit of&lt;br /&gt;
the divine vision when he makes one of his characters say about another, &amp;quot; God&lt;br /&gt;
made him, and therefore let him pass for a man.&amp;quot; You will note that, wherever&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare deals with a villain, he has no kind of antipathy to him, whether it&lt;br /&gt;
is to Cassio or Iago; he makes his villain live his life and expound himself,&lt;br /&gt;
for Shakespeare has no resentment of the evil in the villain. Even in the case&lt;br /&gt;
of Falstaff, full of coarseness and trickery, Shakespeare sees the man as he is,&lt;br /&gt;
and there is no condemnatory judgement. A poet observes men as they are;&lt;br /&gt;
therefore we find in the poets a larger vision than that of which the ordinary&lt;br /&gt;
man is capable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Divine Vision&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 4-5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Interpretations by William Q. Judge==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The words of the immortal Shakespeare - &amp;quot;The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interrèd with their bones,&amp;quot; receive a striking exemplification under this doctrine. For, as the evil thoughts and deeds are the more material and therefore more firmly impacted into the Astral Light, while the good, being spiritual, easily fade out, we are in effect at the mercy of the evil done. And the Adepts assert that Shakespeare was, unconsciously to himself, inspired by one of their own number.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;Echoes of the Orient Vol. II&#039;&#039; (San Diego, CA: Point Loma Publications, 1987), 7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Shakespeare was right in saying that life is a play, for the great life of the soul is a drama, and each new life and rebirth another act in which we assume another part and put on a new dress, but all through it we are the self-same person. So instead of its being unjust, it&lt;br /&gt;
is perfect justice, and in no other manner could justice be preserved.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;The Ocean of Theosophy&#039;&#039; (Los Angeles, CA: The Theosophy Company, 1962), 74.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22622</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22622"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T21:04:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Shakespeare in the Mahatma Letters */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] held Shakespeare in highest regard. The Introductory of [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]] begins with his words from &#039;&#039;Henry  V&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Gently to hear, kindly to judge.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), xvii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; She further states that &amp;quot;Shakespeare, was and will ever remain the intellectual &amp;quot;Sphinx&amp;quot; of the ages&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 419.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also makes numerous references to verses from Shakespeare&#039;s work in the Theosophical Magazine, [[Lucifer (periodical)|&#039;&#039;Lucifer&#039;&#039;]]. In her article, &amp;quot;Genius&amp;quot; (Volume V, No. 27, November 1889), Blavatsky wrote:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Perchance, in their unsophisticated wisdom, the philosophers of old were nearer truth than are our modern wiseacres, when they endowed man with a tutelar deity, a Spirit whom they called genius. The substance of this entity, to say nothing of its essence—observe the distinction, reader,—and the presence of both manifests itself according to the organism of the person it informs. As Shakespeare says of the genius of great men—what we perceive of his substance “is not here”—“For what you see is but the smallest part And least proportion of humanity: I tell you, madam, were the whole frame here, It is of such a spacious lofty pitch, Your roof were not sufficient to contain it.”* This is precisely what the Esoteric philosophy teaches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;Collected Writings Vol. XII&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1980), 14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare in the Mahatma Letters==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Shakespeare is also mentioned within the [[Mahatma letters]]. In [[ML129#Page 1|one of his letters]], [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] wrote, &amp;quot;My good friend — Shakespeare said truly that “our doubts are traitors.” Why should you doubt or create in your mind ever growing monsters?A little more knowledge in occult laws would have set your mind at rest long ago, avoided many a tear to your gentle lady and pang to yourself.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chin, Vicente Hao, Jr. &#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence&#039;&#039; (Quezon City, Philippines: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 116. See [[Mahatma Letter No. 129#Page 1|Mahatma Letter No. 129 page 1]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on C. Jinarājadāsa==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;But there is a different vision possible and every cultured man and woman knows&lt;br /&gt;
something of it, for it is given to us by the great poets. For what makes a poet&lt;br /&gt;
is a larger vision and especially is the larger vision of man a characteristic&lt;br /&gt;
of the great poets. The great poet stands apart from mankind; you find that&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare, who looks at all men as if from a Mount Olympus, notes their&lt;br /&gt;
foibles and foolishnesses, and yet smiles on them all. There is the spirit of&lt;br /&gt;
the divine vision when he makes one of his characters say about another, &amp;quot; God&lt;br /&gt;
made him, and therefore let him pass for a man.&amp;quot; You will note that, wherever&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare deals with a villain, he has no kind of antipathy to him, whether it&lt;br /&gt;
is to Cassio or Iago; he makes his villain live his life and expound himself,&lt;br /&gt;
for Shakespeare has no resentment of the evil in the villain. Even in the case&lt;br /&gt;
of Falstaff, full of coarseness and trickery, Shakespeare sees the man as he is,&lt;br /&gt;
and there is no condemnatory judgement. A poet observes men as they are;&lt;br /&gt;
therefore we find in the poets a larger vision than that of which the ordinary&lt;br /&gt;
man is capable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Divine Vision&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 4-5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Interpretations by William Quan Judge==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The words of the immortal Shakespeare - &amp;quot;The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interrèd with their bones,&amp;quot; receive a striking exemplification under this doctrine. For, as the evil thoughts and deeds are the more material and therefore more firmly impacted into the Astral Light, while the good, being spiritual, easily fade out, we are in effect at the mercy of the evil done. And the Adepts assert that Shakespeare was, unconsciously to himself, inspired by one of their own number.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;Echoes of the Orient Vol. II&#039;&#039; (San Diego, CA: Point Loma Publications, 1987), 7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Shakespeare was right in saying that life is a play, for the great life of the soul is a drama, and each new life and rebirth another act in which we assume another part and put on a new dress, but all through it we are the self-same person. So instead of its being unjust, it&lt;br /&gt;
is perfect justice, and in no other manner could justice be preserved.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;The Ocean of Theosophy&#039;&#039; (Los Angeles, CA: The Theosophy Company, 1962), 74.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22621</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22621"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T21:03:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Shakespeare in the Mahatma Letters */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] held Shakespeare in highest regard. The Introductory of [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]] begins with his words from &#039;&#039;Henry  V&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Gently to hear, kindly to judge.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), xvii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; She further states that &amp;quot;Shakespeare, was and will ever remain the intellectual &amp;quot;Sphinx&amp;quot; of the ages&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 419.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also makes numerous references to verses from Shakespeare&#039;s work in the Theosophical Magazine, [[Lucifer (periodical)|&#039;&#039;Lucifer&#039;&#039;]]. In her article, &amp;quot;Genius&amp;quot; (Volume V, No. 27, November 1889), Blavatsky wrote:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Perchance, in their unsophisticated wisdom, the philosophers of old were nearer truth than are our modern wiseacres, when they endowed man with a tutelar deity, a Spirit whom they called genius. The substance of this entity, to say nothing of its essence—observe the distinction, reader,—and the presence of both manifests itself according to the organism of the person it informs. As Shakespeare says of the genius of great men—what we perceive of his substance “is not here”—“For what you see is but the smallest part And least proportion of humanity: I tell you, madam, were the whole frame here, It is of such a spacious lofty pitch, Your roof were not sufficient to contain it.”* This is precisely what the Esoteric philosophy teaches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;Collected Writings Vol. XII&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1980), 14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare in the Mahatma Letters==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Shakespeare is also mentioned within the [[Mahatma letters]]. In [[ML129#Page 1|one of his letters]], [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] wrote, &amp;quot;My good friend — Shakespeare said truly that “our doubts are traitors.” Why should you doubt or create in your mind ever growing monsters?A little more knowledge in occult laws would have set your mind at rest long ago, avoided many a tear to your gentle lady and pang to yourself.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chin, Vicente Hao, Jr. &#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence&#039;&#039; (Quezon City, Philippines: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 116.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on C. Jinarājadāsa==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;But there is a different vision possible and every cultured man and woman knows&lt;br /&gt;
something of it, for it is given to us by the great poets. For what makes a poet&lt;br /&gt;
is a larger vision and especially is the larger vision of man a characteristic&lt;br /&gt;
of the great poets. The great poet stands apart from mankind; you find that&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare, who looks at all men as if from a Mount Olympus, notes their&lt;br /&gt;
foibles and foolishnesses, and yet smiles on them all. There is the spirit of&lt;br /&gt;
the divine vision when he makes one of his characters say about another, &amp;quot; God&lt;br /&gt;
made him, and therefore let him pass for a man.&amp;quot; You will note that, wherever&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare deals with a villain, he has no kind of antipathy to him, whether it&lt;br /&gt;
is to Cassio or Iago; he makes his villain live his life and expound himself,&lt;br /&gt;
for Shakespeare has no resentment of the evil in the villain. Even in the case&lt;br /&gt;
of Falstaff, full of coarseness and trickery, Shakespeare sees the man as he is,&lt;br /&gt;
and there is no condemnatory judgement. A poet observes men as they are;&lt;br /&gt;
therefore we find in the poets a larger vision than that of which the ordinary&lt;br /&gt;
man is capable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Divine Vision&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 4-5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Interpretations by William Quan Judge==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The words of the immortal Shakespeare - &amp;quot;The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interrèd with their bones,&amp;quot; receive a striking exemplification under this doctrine. For, as the evil thoughts and deeds are the more material and therefore more firmly impacted into the Astral Light, while the good, being spiritual, easily fade out, we are in effect at the mercy of the evil done. And the Adepts assert that Shakespeare was, unconsciously to himself, inspired by one of their own number.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;Echoes of the Orient Vol. II&#039;&#039; (San Diego, CA: Point Loma Publications, 1987), 7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Shakespeare was right in saying that life is a play, for the great life of the soul is a drama, and each new life and rebirth another act in which we assume another part and put on a new dress, but all through it we are the self-same person. So instead of its being unjust, it&lt;br /&gt;
is perfect justice, and in no other manner could justice be preserved.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;The Ocean of Theosophy&#039;&#039; (Los Angeles, CA: The Theosophy Company, 1962), 74.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22620</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22620"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T21:02:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Interpretations by William Quan Judge */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] held Shakespeare in highest regard. The Introductory of [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]] begins with his words from &#039;&#039;Henry  V&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Gently to hear, kindly to judge.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), xvii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; She further states that &amp;quot;Shakespeare, was and will ever remain the intellectual &amp;quot;Sphinx&amp;quot; of the ages&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 419.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also makes numerous references to verses from Shakespeare&#039;s work in the Theosophical Magazine, [[Lucifer (periodical)|&#039;&#039;Lucifer&#039;&#039;]]. In her article, &amp;quot;Genius&amp;quot; (Volume V, No. 27, November 1889), Blavatsky wrote:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Perchance, in their unsophisticated wisdom, the philosophers of old were nearer truth than are our modern wiseacres, when they endowed man with a tutelar deity, a Spirit whom they called genius. The substance of this entity, to say nothing of its essence—observe the distinction, reader,—and the presence of both manifests itself according to the organism of the person it informs. As Shakespeare says of the genius of great men—what we perceive of his substance “is not here”—“For what you see is but the smallest part And least proportion of humanity: I tell you, madam, were the whole frame here, It is of such a spacious lofty pitch, Your roof were not sufficient to contain it.”* This is precisely what the Esoteric philosophy teaches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;Collected Writings Vol. XII&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1980), 14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare in the Mahatma Letters==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Shakespeare is also mentioned within the [[Mahatma letters]]. In [[ML129#Page 1|one of his letters]], [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] wrote, &amp;quot;My good friend — Shakespeare said truly that “our doubts are traitors.” Why should you doubt or create in your mind ever growing monsters?A little more knowledge in occult laws would have set your mind at rest long ago, avoided many a tear to your gentle lady and pang to yourself.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chin, Vicente Hao, Jr. The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence (Quezon City, Philippines: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 116.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on C. Jinarājadāsa==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;But there is a different vision possible and every cultured man and woman knows&lt;br /&gt;
something of it, for it is given to us by the great poets. For what makes a poet&lt;br /&gt;
is a larger vision and especially is the larger vision of man a characteristic&lt;br /&gt;
of the great poets. The great poet stands apart from mankind; you find that&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare, who looks at all men as if from a Mount Olympus, notes their&lt;br /&gt;
foibles and foolishnesses, and yet smiles on them all. There is the spirit of&lt;br /&gt;
the divine vision when he makes one of his characters say about another, &amp;quot; God&lt;br /&gt;
made him, and therefore let him pass for a man.&amp;quot; You will note that, wherever&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare deals with a villain, he has no kind of antipathy to him, whether it&lt;br /&gt;
is to Cassio or Iago; he makes his villain live his life and expound himself,&lt;br /&gt;
for Shakespeare has no resentment of the evil in the villain. Even in the case&lt;br /&gt;
of Falstaff, full of coarseness and trickery, Shakespeare sees the man as he is,&lt;br /&gt;
and there is no condemnatory judgement. A poet observes men as they are;&lt;br /&gt;
therefore we find in the poets a larger vision than that of which the ordinary&lt;br /&gt;
man is capable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Divine Vision&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 4-5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Interpretations by William Quan Judge==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The words of the immortal Shakespeare - &amp;quot;The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interrèd with their bones,&amp;quot; receive a striking exemplification under this doctrine. For, as the evil thoughts and deeds are the more material and therefore more firmly impacted into the Astral Light, while the good, being spiritual, easily fade out, we are in effect at the mercy of the evil done. And the Adepts assert that Shakespeare was, unconsciously to himself, inspired by one of their own number.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;Echoes of the Orient Vol. II&#039;&#039; (San Diego, CA: Point Loma Publications, 1987), 7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Shakespeare was right in saying that life is a play, for the great life of the soul is a drama, and each new life and rebirth another act in which we assume another part and put on a new dress, but all through it we are the self-same person. So instead of its being unjust, it&lt;br /&gt;
is perfect justice, and in no other manner could justice be preserved.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;The Ocean of Theosophy&#039;&#039; (Los Angeles, CA: The Theosophy Company, 1962), 74.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22619</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22619"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T20:49:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Influence on H. P. Blavatsky */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] held Shakespeare in highest regard. The Introductory of [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]] begins with his words from &#039;&#039;Henry  V&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Gently to hear, kindly to judge.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), xvii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; She further states that &amp;quot;Shakespeare, was and will ever remain the intellectual &amp;quot;Sphinx&amp;quot; of the ages&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 419.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also makes numerous references to verses from Shakespeare&#039;s work in the Theosophical Magazine, [[Lucifer (periodical)|&#039;&#039;Lucifer&#039;&#039;]]. In her article, &amp;quot;Genius&amp;quot; (Volume V, No. 27, November 1889), Blavatsky wrote:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Perchance, in their unsophisticated wisdom, the philosophers of old were nearer truth than are our modern wiseacres, when they endowed man with a tutelar deity, a Spirit whom they called genius. The substance of this entity, to say nothing of its essence—observe the distinction, reader,—and the presence of both manifests itself according to the organism of the person it informs. As Shakespeare says of the genius of great men—what we perceive of his substance “is not here”—“For what you see is but the smallest part And least proportion of humanity: I tell you, madam, were the whole frame here, It is of such a spacious lofty pitch, Your roof were not sufficient to contain it.”* This is precisely what the Esoteric philosophy teaches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;Collected Writings Vol. XII&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1980), 14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare in the Mahatma Letters==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Shakespeare is also mentioned within the [[Mahatma letters]]. In [[ML129#Page 1|one of his letters]], [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] wrote, &amp;quot;My good friend — Shakespeare said truly that “our doubts are traitors.” Why should you doubt or create in your mind ever growing monsters?A little more knowledge in occult laws would have set your mind at rest long ago, avoided many a tear to your gentle lady and pang to yourself.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chin, Vicente Hao, Jr. The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence (Quezon City, Philippines: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 116.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on C. Jinarājadāsa==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;But there is a different vision possible and every cultured man and woman knows&lt;br /&gt;
something of it, for it is given to us by the great poets. For what makes a poet&lt;br /&gt;
is a larger vision and especially is the larger vision of man a characteristic&lt;br /&gt;
of the great poets. The great poet stands apart from mankind; you find that&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare, who looks at all men as if from a Mount Olympus, notes their&lt;br /&gt;
foibles and foolishnesses, and yet smiles on them all. There is the spirit of&lt;br /&gt;
the divine vision when he makes one of his characters say about another, &amp;quot; God&lt;br /&gt;
made him, and therefore let him pass for a man.&amp;quot; You will note that, wherever&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare deals with a villain, he has no kind of antipathy to him, whether it&lt;br /&gt;
is to Cassio or Iago; he makes his villain live his life and expound himself,&lt;br /&gt;
for Shakespeare has no resentment of the evil in the villain. Even in the case&lt;br /&gt;
of Falstaff, full of coarseness and trickery, Shakespeare sees the man as he is,&lt;br /&gt;
and there is no condemnatory judgement. A poet observes men as they are;&lt;br /&gt;
therefore we find in the poets a larger vision than that of which the ordinary&lt;br /&gt;
man is capable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Divine Vision&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 4-5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Interpretations by William Quan Judge==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The words of the immortal Shakespeare - &amp;quot;The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interrèd with their bones,&amp;quot; receive a striking exemplification under this doctrine. For, as the evil thoughts and deeds are the more material and therefore more firmly impacted into the Astral Light, while the good, being spiritual, easily fade out, we are in effect at the mercy of the evil done. And the Adepts assert that Shakespeare was, unconsciously to himself, inspired by one of their own number.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;Echoes of the Orient Vol. II&#039;&#039; (San Diego, CA: Point Loma Publications, 1987), 7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare was right in saying that life&lt;br /&gt;
is a play, for the great life of the soul is a drama, and each new life and&lt;br /&gt;
rebirth another act in which we assume another part and put on a new dress, but&lt;br /&gt;
all through it we are the self-same person. So instead of its being unjust, it&lt;br /&gt;
is perfect justice, and in no other manner could justice be preserved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	(Judge, Ocean of Theosophy)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22618</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22618"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T20:44:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Shakespeare in Theosophy */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] held Shakespeare in highest regard. The Introductory of [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]] begins with his words from &#039;&#039;Henry  V&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Gently to hear, kindly to judge.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), xvii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; She further states that &amp;quot;Shakespeare, was and will ever remain the intellectual &amp;quot;Sphinx&amp;quot; of the ages&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 419.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also makes numerous references to verses from Shakespeare&#039;s work in the Theosophical Magazine, [[Lucifer (periodical)|&#039;&#039;Lucifer&#039;&#039;]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Perchance, in their unsophisticated wisdom, the philosophers of old were nearer truth than are our modern wiseacres, when they endowed man with a tutelar deity, a Spirit whom they called genius. The substance of this entity, to say nothing of its essence—observe the distinction, reader,—and the presence of both manifests itself according to the organism of the person it informs. As Shakespeare says of the genius of great men—what we perceive of his substance “is not here”—“For what you see is but the smallest part And least proportion of humanity: I tell you, madam, were the whole frame here, It is of such a spacious lofty pitch, Your roof were not sufficient to contain it.”* This is precisely what the Esoteric philosophy teaches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;Collected Writings Vol. XII&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1980), 14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare in the Mahatma Letters==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Shakespeare is also mentioned within the [[Mahatma letters]]. In [[ML129#Page 1|one of his letters]], [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] wrote, &amp;quot;My good friend — Shakespeare said truly that “our doubts are traitors.” Why should you doubt or create in your mind ever growing monsters?A little more knowledge in occult laws would have set your mind at rest long ago, avoided many a tear to your gentle lady and pang to yourself.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chin, Vicente Hao, Jr. The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence (Quezon City, Philippines: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 116.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on C. Jinarājadāsa==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;But there is a different vision possible and every cultured man and woman knows&lt;br /&gt;
something of it, for it is given to us by the great poets. For what makes a poet&lt;br /&gt;
is a larger vision and especially is the larger vision of man a characteristic&lt;br /&gt;
of the great poets. The great poet stands apart from mankind; you find that&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare, who looks at all men as if from a Mount Olympus, notes their&lt;br /&gt;
foibles and foolishnesses, and yet smiles on them all. There is the spirit of&lt;br /&gt;
the divine vision when he makes one of his characters say about another, &amp;quot; God&lt;br /&gt;
made him, and therefore let him pass for a man.&amp;quot; You will note that, wherever&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare deals with a villain, he has no kind of antipathy to him, whether it&lt;br /&gt;
is to Cassio or Iago; he makes his villain live his life and expound himself,&lt;br /&gt;
for Shakespeare has no resentment of the evil in the villain. Even in the case&lt;br /&gt;
of Falstaff, full of coarseness and trickery, Shakespeare sees the man as he is,&lt;br /&gt;
and there is no condemnatory judgement. A poet observes men as they are;&lt;br /&gt;
therefore we find in the poets a larger vision than that of which the ordinary&lt;br /&gt;
man is capable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Divine Vision&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 4-5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Interpretations by William Quan Judge==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The words of the immortal Shakespeare - &amp;quot;The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interrèd with their bones,&amp;quot; receive a striking exemplification under this doctrine. For, as the evil thoughts and deeds are the more material and therefore more firmly impacted into the Astral Light, while the good, being spiritual, easily fade out, we are in effect at the mercy of the evil done. And the Adepts assert that Shakespeare was, unconsciously to himself, inspired by one of their own number.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;Echoes of the Orient Vol. II&#039;&#039; (San Diego, CA: Point Loma Publications, 1987), 7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare was right in saying that life&lt;br /&gt;
is a play, for the great life of the soul is a drama, and each new life and&lt;br /&gt;
rebirth another act in which we assume another part and put on a new dress, but&lt;br /&gt;
all through it we are the self-same person. So instead of its being unjust, it&lt;br /&gt;
is perfect justice, and in no other manner could justice be preserved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	(Judge, Ocean of Theosophy)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22617</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22617"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T20:41:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Shakespeare in Theosophy */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] held Shakespeare in highest regard. The Introductory of [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]] begins with his words from &#039;&#039;Henry  V&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Gently to hear, kindly to judge.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), xvii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; She further states that &amp;quot;Shakespeare, was and will ever remain the intellectual &amp;quot;Sphinx&amp;quot; of the ages&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 419.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also makes numerous references to verses from Shakespeare&#039;s work in the Theosophical Magazine, [[Lucifer (periodical)|&#039;&#039;Lucifer&#039;&#039;]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Perchance, in their unsophisticated wisdom, the philosophers of old were nearer truth than are our modern wiseacres, when they endowed man with a tutelar deity, a Spirit whom they called genius. The substance of this entity, to say nothing of its essence—observe the distinction, reader,—and the presence of both manifests itself according to the organism of the person it informs. As Shakespeare says of the genius of great men—what we perceive of his substance “is not here”—“For what you see is but the smallest part And least proportion of humanity: I tell you, madam, were the whole frame here, It is of such a spacious lofty pitch, Your roof were not sufficient to contain it.”* This is precisely what the Esoteric philosophy teaches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;Collected Writings Vol. XII&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1980), 14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare in Theosophy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Shakespeare is also mentioned within the [[Mahatma letters]]. In [[ML129#Page 1|one of his letters]], [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] wrote, &amp;quot;My good friend — Shakespeare said truly that “our doubts are traitors.” Why should you doubt or create in your mind ever growing monsters?A little more knowledge in occult laws would have set your mind at rest long ago, avoided many a tear to your gentle lady and pang to yourself.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chin, Vicente Hao, Jr. The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence (Quezon City, Philippines: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 116.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;But there is a different vision possible and every cultured man and woman knows&lt;br /&gt;
something of it, for it is given to us by the great poets. For what makes a poet&lt;br /&gt;
is a larger vision and especially is the larger vision of man a characteristic&lt;br /&gt;
of the great poets. The great poet stands apart from mankind; you find that&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare, who looks at all men as if from a Mount Olympus, notes their&lt;br /&gt;
foibles and foolishnesses, and yet smiles on them all. There is the spirit of&lt;br /&gt;
the divine vision when he makes one of his characters say about another, &amp;quot; God&lt;br /&gt;
made him, and therefore let him pass for a man.&amp;quot; You will note that, wherever&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare deals with a villain, he has no kind of antipathy to him, whether it&lt;br /&gt;
is to Cassio or Iago; he makes his villain live his life and expound himself,&lt;br /&gt;
for Shakespeare has no resentment of the evil in the villain. Even in the case&lt;br /&gt;
of Falstaff, full of coarseness and trickery, Shakespeare sees the man as he is,&lt;br /&gt;
and there is no condemnatory judgement. A poet observes men as they are;&lt;br /&gt;
therefore we find in the poets a larger vision than that of which the ordinary&lt;br /&gt;
man is capable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Divine Vision&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 4-5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The words of the immortal Shakespeare - &amp;quot;The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interrèd with their bones,&amp;quot; receive a striking exemplification under this doctrine. For, as the evil thoughts and deeds are the more material and therefore more firmly impacted into the Astral Light, while the good, being spiritual, easily fade out, we are in effect at the mercy of the evil done. And the Adepts assert that Shakespeare was, unconsciously to himself, inspired by one of their own number.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge, William Quan. &#039;&#039;Echoes of the Orient Vol. II&#039;&#039; (San Diego, CA: Point Loma Publications, 1987), 7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22616</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22616"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T19:44:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Shakespeare in Theosophy */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] held Shakespeare in highest regard. The Introductory of [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]] begins with his words from &#039;&#039;Henry  V&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Gently to hear, kindly to judge.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), xvii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; She further states that &amp;quot;Shakespeare, was and will ever remain the intellectual &amp;quot;Sphinx&amp;quot; of the ages&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 419.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also makes numerous references to verses from Shakespeare&#039;s work in the Theosophical Magazine, [[Lucifer (periodical)|&#039;&#039;Lucifer&#039;&#039;]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Perchance, in their unsophisticated wisdom, the philosophers of old were nearer truth than are our modern wiseacres, when they endowed man with a tutelar deity, a Spirit whom they called genius. The substance of this entity, to say nothing of its essence—observe the distinction, reader,—and the presence of both manifests itself according to the organism of the person it informs. As Shakespeare says of the genius of great men—what we perceive of his substance “is not here”—“For what you see is but the smallest part And least proportion of humanity: I tell you, madam, were the whole frame here, It is of such a spacious lofty pitch, Your roof were not sufficient to contain it.”* This is precisely what the Esoteric philosophy teaches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;Collected Writings Vol. XII&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1980), 14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare in Theosophy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Shakespeare is also mentioned within the [[Mahatma letters]]. In [[ML129#Page 1|one of his letters]], [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] wrote, &amp;quot;My good friend — Shakespeare said truly that “our doubts are traitors.” Why should you doubt or create in your mind ever growing monsters?A little more knowledge in occult laws would have set your mind at rest long ago, avoided many a tear to your gentle lady and pang to yourself.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chin, Vicente Hao, Jr. The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence (Quezon City, Philippines: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 116.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;But there is a different vision possible and every cultured man and woman knows&lt;br /&gt;
something of it, for it is given to us by the great poets. For what makes a poet&lt;br /&gt;
is a larger vision and especially is the larger vision of man a characteristic&lt;br /&gt;
of the great poets. The great poet stands apart from mankind; you find that&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare, who looks at all men as if from a Mount Olympus, notes their&lt;br /&gt;
foibles and foolishnesses, and yet smiles on them all. There is the spirit of&lt;br /&gt;
the divine vision when he makes one of his characters say about another, &amp;quot; God&lt;br /&gt;
made him, and therefore let him pass for a man.&amp;quot; You will note that, wherever&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare deals with a villain, he has no kind of antipathy to him, whether it&lt;br /&gt;
is to Cassio or Iago; he makes his villain live his life and expound himself,&lt;br /&gt;
for Shakespeare has no resentment of the evil in the villain. Even in the case&lt;br /&gt;
of Falstaff, full of coarseness and trickery, Shakespeare sees the man as he is,&lt;br /&gt;
and there is no condemnatory judgement. A poet observes men as they are;&lt;br /&gt;
therefore we find in the poets a larger vision than that of which the ordinary&lt;br /&gt;
man is capable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Divine Vision&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 4-5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Shakespeare&amp;diff=22635</id>
		<title>Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Shakespeare&amp;diff=22635"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T19:35:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: Redirected page to William Shakespeare&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[William Shakespeare]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22615</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22615"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T19:32:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Influence on H. P. Blavatsky */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] held Shakespeare in highest regard. The Introductory of [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]] begins with his words from &#039;&#039;Henry  V&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Gently to hear, kindly to judge.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), xvii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; She further states that &amp;quot;Shakespeare, was and will ever remain the intellectual &amp;quot;Sphinx&amp;quot; of the ages&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 419.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also makes numerous references to verses from Shakespeare&#039;s work in the Theosophical Magazine, [[Lucifer (periodical)|&#039;&#039;Lucifer&#039;&#039;]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Perchance, in their unsophisticated wisdom, the philosophers of old were nearer truth than are our modern wiseacres, when they endowed man with a tutelar deity, a Spirit whom they called genius. The substance of this entity, to say nothing of its essence—observe the distinction, reader,—and the presence of both manifests itself according to the organism of the person it informs. As Shakespeare says of the genius of great men—what we perceive of his substance “is not here”—“For what you see is but the smallest part And least proportion of humanity: I tell you, madam, were the whole frame here, It is of such a spacious lofty pitch, Your roof were not sufficient to contain it.”* This is precisely what the Esoteric philosophy teaches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;Collected Writings Vol. XII&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1980), 14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare in Theosophy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Shakespeare is also mentioned within the [[Mahatma letters]]. In [[ML129#Page 1|one of his letters]], [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] wrote, &amp;quot;My good friend — Shakespeare said truly that “our doubts are traitors.” Why should you doubt or create in your mind ever growing monsters?A little more knowledge in occult laws would have set your mind at rest long ago, avoided many a tear to your gentle lady and pang to yourself.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chin, Vicente Hao, Jr. The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence (Quezon City, Philippines: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 116.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22614</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22614"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T19:13:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Shakespeare in Theosophy */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] held Shakespeare in highest regard. The Introductory of [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]] begins with his words from &#039;&#039;Henry the V&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Gently to hear, kindly to judge.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), xvii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; She further states that &amp;quot;Shakespeare, was and will ever remain the intellectual &amp;quot;Sphinx&amp;quot; of the ages&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 419.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare in Theosophy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Shakespeare is also mentioned within the [[Mahatma letters]]. In [[ML129#Page 1|one of his letters]], [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] wrote, &amp;quot;My good friend — Shakespeare said truly that “our doubts are traitors.” Why should you doubt or create in your mind ever growing monsters?A little more knowledge in occult laws would have set your mind at rest long ago, avoided many a tear to your gentle lady and pang to yourself.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chin, Vicente Hao, Jr. The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett in Chronological Sequence (Quezon City, Philippines: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 116.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22613</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22613"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T19:09:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Theosophy and Shakespeare */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] held Shakespeare in highest regard. The Introductory of [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]] begins with his words from &#039;&#039;Henry the V&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Gently to hear, kindly to judge.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), xvii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; She further states that &amp;quot;Shakespeare, was and will ever remain the intellectual &amp;quot;Sphinx&amp;quot; of the ages&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 419.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shakespeare in Theosophy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Shakespeare is also mentioned within the [[Mahatma letters]]. In [[ML129#Page 1|one of his letters]], [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] wrote, &amp;quot;My good friend — Shakespeare said truly that “our doubts are traitors.” Why should you doubt or create in your mind ever growing monsters?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22612</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22612"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T19:06:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Influence on H. P. Blavatsky */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] held Shakespeare in highest regard. The Introductory of [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]] begins with his words from &#039;&#039;Henry the V&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Gently to hear, kindly to judge.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), xvii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; She further states that &amp;quot;Shakespeare, was and will ever remain the intellectual &amp;quot;Sphinx&amp;quot; of the ages&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 419.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Theosophy and Shakespeare==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare is also mentioned in the [[Mahatma letters]]. In [[ML129#Page 1|one of his letters]], [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] wrote, &amp;quot;My good friend — Shakespeare said truly that “our doubts are traitors.” Why should you doubt or create in your mind ever growing monsters?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22611</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22611"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T19:06:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Theosophy and Shakespeare */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Theosophy and Shakespeare==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare is also mentioned in the [[Mahatma letters]]. In [[ML129#Page 1|one of his letters]], [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] wrote, &amp;quot;My good friend — Shakespeare said truly that “our doubts are traitors.” Why should you doubt or create in your mind ever growing monsters?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22610</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22610"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T19:05:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Theosophy and Shakespeare */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Theosophy and Shakespeare==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] held Shakespeare in highest regard. The Introductory of [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]] begins with his words from &#039;&#039;Henry the V&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Gently to hear, kindly to judge.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), xvii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; She further states that &amp;quot;Shakespeare, was and will ever remain the intellectual &amp;quot;Sphinx&amp;quot; of the ages&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 419.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare is also mentioned in the [[Mahatma letters]]. In [[ML129#Page 1|one of his letters]], [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] wrote, &amp;quot;My good friend — Shakespeare said truly that “our doubts are traitors.” Why should you doubt or create in your mind ever growing monsters?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22609</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22609"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T19:04:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Theosophy and Shakespeare */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Theosophy and Shakespeare==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] held Shakespeare in highest regard. The Introductory of [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]] begins with his words from &#039;&#039;Henry the V&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Gently to hear, kindly to judge.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), xvii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; She further states that &amp;quot;Shakespeare, was and will ever remain the intellectual &amp;quot;Sphinx&amp;quot; of the ages&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 419.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare is also mentioned in the [[Mahatma Letters]]. In [[ML129#Page 1|one of his letters]], [[Mahatma]] [[Koot Hoomi|K. H.]] wrote, &amp;quot;My good friend — Shakespeare said truly that “our doubts are traitors.” Why should you doubt or create in your mind ever growing monsters?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22608</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22608"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T18:45:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Theosophy and Shakespeare */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Theosophy and Shakespeare==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] held Shakespeare in highest regard. The Introductory of [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]] begins with his words from &#039;&#039;Henry the V&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Gently to hear, kindly to judge.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. I (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), xvii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; She further states that &amp;quot;Shakespeare, was and will ever remain the intellectual &amp;quot;Sphinx&amp;quot; of the ages&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 419.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22607</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22607"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T18:28:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Theosophy and Shakespeare==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English |Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22606</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22606"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T18:27:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Theosophy and Shakespeare==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Poets | Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Playwrights | Shakespeare, William]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Nationality English | Shakespeare, William]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22605</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22605"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T18:22:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Division of Seven */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Theosophy and Shakespeare==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039; (London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), fn. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22604</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22604"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T18:21:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Division of Seven */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Theosophy and Shakespeare==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039;(London: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The life of man he divided into seven ages (Shakespeare, &#039;&#039;As You Like It&#039;&#039;, Act II, Scene 7, l. 143), for &amp;quot;As the moon changes her phases every seven days, this number influences all&lt;br /&gt;
sublunary beings,&amp;quot; and even the Earth, as we know. With the child, it is the teeth that appear in the seventh month and he sheds them at seven years; at twice seven puberty begins, at three times seven all our mental and vital powers are developed, at four times seven he is in his full strength, at five times seven his passions are most developed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), f. 312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22603</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22603"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T18:08:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Theosophy and Shakespeare==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22602</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22602"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T18:07:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Theosophy and Shakespeare==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 117.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22601</id>
		<title>William Shakespeare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=William_Shakespeare&amp;diff=22601"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T17:08:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: Created page with &amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;William Shakespeare&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist.   ==Biography==  ==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==  ==Theosophy a...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;William Shakespeare&#039;&#039;&#039; ( b. April 26, 1564 - d, April 23, 1616) was a English playwright, poet, and dramatist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influence on H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Theosophy and Shakespeare==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Division of Seven==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By what prophetic instinct Shakespeare pitched upon seven as the number which&lt;br /&gt;
suited his fantastic classification of the ages of man, is a question with which&lt;br /&gt;
we need not be much concerned; but certain it is that he could not have made a&lt;br /&gt;
more felicitous choice. In periods of sevens the evolution of the races of man&lt;br /&gt;
may be traced, and the actual number of the objective worlds which constitute&lt;br /&gt;
our system, and of which the earth is one, is seven also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sinnett, Alfred Percy. &#039;&#039;Esoteric Buddhism&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15240</id>
		<title>Greek mythology</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15240"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T16:34:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Importance of Mythology */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Greek Mythology&#039;&#039;&#039; is the polytheistic myths and legends beliefs of the ancient Greeks. Ancient Greeks often relied on myths and legends to explain their natural world, such as the change of seasons. Largely inspiring Etruscan and Roman mythology, Greek legends  and symbolism remain well known throughout the world today. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Primary Gods and Legends==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Greek mythology, there are many other demi-gods and heros, but the most well known gods are the immortals who sit upon the thrones of Mt. Olympus. The Olympian gods represent a specific natural element or energy force. They are the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Zeus]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the heavens, or as later mythology would determine, the God of the Gods (Roman Name is Jupiter)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Posiedon&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the seas, who would challenge Athena for the title of patron of Athens (Roman Name is Neptune)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Hades]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the underworld, whom oversaw the sould of the mortally deceased (Roman Name is Pluto) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hera&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of marriage, who served as Zeus&#039; primary and exceedingly jelous wife (Roman Name is Juno) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Demeter&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the harvest, whose daughter was the delicate Persephone (Roman Name is Ceres)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hestia&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the hearth, who tends Mt. Olympus&#039; sacred fire (Roman Name is Vesta) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hephaestus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of blacksmiths and craftsmen, who forged lightning bolts for Zeus (Roman Name is Vulcan)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Athena]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of wisdom, who became the patroness of Athens (Roman Name is [[Minerva]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Artemis&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of hunting and wilderness, who was the twin sister of Apollo (Roman Name is Diana)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Apollo&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of music and light, who was the twin brother of Artemis (Roman Name is Apollo)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Ares&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of war, who was quite reckless in his sides and choices in battle (Roman Name is Mars)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Aphrodite&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of love, who rose from the botton of the sea (Roman Name is Venus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hermes&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of theives and trickery, who also served as a messenger of the Gods (Roman Name is Mercury)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Dionysus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of winemaking and festival, who also has been metaphorically compared to Jesus Christ (Roman Name is Bacchus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Persephone&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess-daughter of Demeter, who also served as the queen of the underworld (Roman Name is Proserpina)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are various other deities, which include the Titans (Cronus, [[Prometheus]], and Epimetheus) and  demi-gods (Pan, Orion, and Minos). The heros of Greek myth and legend are also quite known, as Heracles, Odysseus, Perseus, Theseus, and Achilles have remained highly popular myths.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H. P. Blavatsky and Greek Myths==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] references Greek myths and legends often throughout [[The Theosophical Glossary (book)|&#039;&#039;Theosophical Glossary&#039;&#039;]] and [[Isis Unveiled (book)|&#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled&#039;&#039;]]. She remarks that the original truth of Greek myths hold significant understanding of the [[Phenomena]] of the universe. H. P. Blavatsky elaborated in [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]]:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;For a myth, in Greek mythos, means oral tradition, passed from mouth to mouth from one generation to the other; and even in the modern etymology the term stands for a fabulous statement conveying some important truth; a tale of some extraordinary personage whose biography has become overgrown, owing to the veneration of successive generations, with rich popular fancy, but which is no wholesale fable. Like our ancestors, the primitive Aryans, we believe firmly in the personality and intelligence of more than one phenomenon-producing Force in nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. I&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), 425.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also comments on Greek mythology&#039;s greater archetypal meanings for humanity. In regards to the story of [[Prometheus]], Blavatsky extends the condition of Prometheus to the whole experience of collective humanity. She uses Prometheus as a metaphor for the virtues of man, which include the intellect and ambition. She writes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The Titan is more than a thief of the celestial fire. He is a representation of humanity-active, industrious, intelligent, but at the same time ambitious, which aims at equalling divine powers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 525.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anthropomorphism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In traditional Greek mythology, the gods inhabit bodies that display the vices and virtues that are seen in the lower states of man. Many [[Theosophists]] believe the reason for the anthropomorphism of the gods is to give them the full spectrum of the human experience, including the sensual desires. As [[Alvin Boyd Kuhn]] remarks:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The dark night of the soul,&amp;quot; no less than the Götterdämmerung, was, in the&lt;br /&gt;
ancient mind, just the condition of the soul&#039;s embodiment in physical forms.&lt;br /&gt;
Taylor reasons that Minerva (the rational faculty, as Goddess of Wisdom) was by&lt;br /&gt;
her attachment to body given wholly &amp;quot;to the dangerous employment and abandons&lt;br /&gt;
the proper characteristics of her nature for the destructive revels of desire.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
All this is the dialectic statement of the main theme of ancient theology - the&lt;br /&gt;
incarnation of the godlike intellect and divine soul in the darksome conditions&lt;br /&gt;
of animal bodies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kuhn, Alvin Boyd. &#039;&#039;The Lost Light: An Interpretation of Ancient Scriptures&#039;&#039; (Rahway, NJ: Quinn &amp;amp; Boden Company, 1940), 146.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though many Theosophists describe the human condition of the gods as degrading, [[Annie Besant]] describes the anthropomorphism as an inspiration towards the individual experience of man. She accounts that the fall and triumph of the Greek Olympians serve as a metaphor to man&#039;s ability to rise above the errors of his way. She notes:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;That one who falls thus may quickly rise again is encouraging. That old Greek allegory in which every time that the hero falls to earth, worsted in the conflict, he gains new strength from it, applies to man.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Besant, Annie. &#039;&#039;Talks on the Path of Occultism: Vol. II The Voice of The Silence&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1965), 154.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Importance of Mythology==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In ancient Greece, the Greeks created pieces of art to serve as physical embodiment of their attributes the gods represented. They believed the art was sacred, and through the art one could embrace the qualities of the gods. Theosophists recognize this tradition, as [[Curuppumullage Jinarājadāsa]] comments: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Similarly it is that during those periods of spiritual dryness we can, if we have so trained ourselves, commune with God through various forms of Art, for Art fundamentally is a revelation of the Divine Nature, it reveals what Plato called the Idea or the Archetype. The ancient Greeks were particularly sensitive to this aspect of Art. If they looked at a statue of Apollo, the sun-god, it was not merely to them a statue of some handsome youth, but there radiated from the statue a mysterious influence, so that they came to feel the influence of God. Similarly with the goddess Minerva; they felt, when there was an adequately beautiful image in a temple, that somehow as they offered their adoration to it, the image was like a wonderful window through which they looked into the Divine Nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Discourses on the Bhagavad Gita&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1953), 99.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15239</id>
		<title>Greek mythology</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15239"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T16:24:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Importance of Mythology */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Greek Mythology&#039;&#039;&#039; is the polytheistic myths and legends beliefs of the ancient Greeks. Ancient Greeks often relied on myths and legends to explain their natural world, such as the change of seasons. Largely inspiring Etruscan and Roman mythology, Greek legends  and symbolism remain well known throughout the world today. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Primary Gods and Legends==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Greek mythology, there are many other demi-gods and heros, but the most well known gods are the immortals who sit upon the thrones of Mt. Olympus. The Olympian gods represent a specific natural element or energy force. They are the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Zeus]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the heavens, or as later mythology would determine, the God of the Gods (Roman Name is Jupiter)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Posiedon&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the seas, who would challenge Athena for the title of patron of Athens (Roman Name is Neptune)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Hades]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the underworld, whom oversaw the sould of the mortally deceased (Roman Name is Pluto) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hera&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of marriage, who served as Zeus&#039; primary and exceedingly jelous wife (Roman Name is Juno) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Demeter&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the harvest, whose daughter was the delicate Persephone (Roman Name is Ceres)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hestia&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the hearth, who tends Mt. Olympus&#039; sacred fire (Roman Name is Vesta) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hephaestus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of blacksmiths and craftsmen, who forged lightning bolts for Zeus (Roman Name is Vulcan)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Athena]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of wisdom, who became the patroness of Athens (Roman Name is [[Minerva]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Artemis&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of hunting and wilderness, who was the twin sister of Apollo (Roman Name is Diana)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Apollo&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of music and light, who was the twin brother of Artemis (Roman Name is Apollo)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Ares&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of war, who was quite reckless in his sides and choices in battle (Roman Name is Mars)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Aphrodite&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of love, who rose from the botton of the sea (Roman Name is Venus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hermes&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of theives and trickery, who also served as a messenger of the Gods (Roman Name is Mercury)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Dionysus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of winemaking and festival, who also has been metaphorically compared to Jesus Christ (Roman Name is Bacchus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Persephone&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess-daughter of Demeter, who also served as the queen of the underworld (Roman Name is Proserpina)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are various other deities, which include the Titans (Cronus, [[Prometheus]], and Epimetheus) and  demi-gods (Pan, Orion, and Minos). The heros of Greek myth and legend are also quite known, as Heracles, Odysseus, Perseus, Theseus, and Achilles have remained highly popular myths.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H. P. Blavatsky and Greek Myths==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] references Greek myths and legends often throughout [[The Theosophical Glossary (book)|&#039;&#039;Theosophical Glossary&#039;&#039;]] and [[Isis Unveiled (book)|&#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled&#039;&#039;]]. She remarks that the original truth of Greek myths hold significant understanding of the [[Phenomena]] of the universe. H. P. Blavatsky elaborated in [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]]:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;For a myth, in Greek mythos, means oral tradition, passed from mouth to mouth from one generation to the other; and even in the modern etymology the term stands for a fabulous statement conveying some important truth; a tale of some extraordinary personage whose biography has become overgrown, owing to the veneration of successive generations, with rich popular fancy, but which is no wholesale fable. Like our ancestors, the primitive Aryans, we believe firmly in the personality and intelligence of more than one phenomenon-producing Force in nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. I&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), 425.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also comments on Greek mythology&#039;s greater archetypal meanings for humanity. In regards to the story of [[Prometheus]], Blavatsky extends the condition of Prometheus to the whole experience of collective humanity. She uses Prometheus as a metaphor for the virtues of man, which include the intellect and ambition. She writes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The Titan is more than a thief of the celestial fire. He is a representation of humanity-active, industrious, intelligent, but at the same time ambitious, which aims at equalling divine powers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 525.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anthropomorphism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In traditional Greek mythology, the gods inhabit bodies that display the vices and virtues that are seen in the lower states of man. Many [[Theosophists]] believe the reason for the anthropomorphism of the gods is to give them the full spectrum of the human experience, including the sensual desires. As [[Alvin Boyd Kuhn]] remarks:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The dark night of the soul,&amp;quot; no less than the Götterdämmerung, was, in the&lt;br /&gt;
ancient mind, just the condition of the soul&#039;s embodiment in physical forms.&lt;br /&gt;
Taylor reasons that Minerva (the rational faculty, as Goddess of Wisdom) was by&lt;br /&gt;
her attachment to body given wholly &amp;quot;to the dangerous employment and abandons&lt;br /&gt;
the proper characteristics of her nature for the destructive revels of desire.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
All this is the dialectic statement of the main theme of ancient theology - the&lt;br /&gt;
incarnation of the godlike intellect and divine soul in the darksome conditions&lt;br /&gt;
of animal bodies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kuhn, Alvin Boyd. &#039;&#039;The Lost Light: An Interpretation of Ancient Scriptures&#039;&#039; (Rahway, NJ: Quinn &amp;amp; Boden Company, 1940), 146.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though many Theosophists describe the human condition of the gods as degrading, [[Annie Besant]] describes the anthropomorphism as an inspiration towards the individual experience of man. She accounts that the fall and triumph of the Greek Olympians serve as a metaphor to man&#039;s ability to rise above the errors of his way. She notes:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;That one who falls thus may quickly rise again is encouraging. That old Greek allegory in which every time that the hero falls to earth, worsted in the conflict, he gains new strength from it, applies to man.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Besant, Annie. &#039;&#039;Talks on the Path of Occultism: Vol. II The Voice of The Silence&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1965), 154.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Importance of Mythology==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In ancient Greece, mythology was revered by the Greeks as a form of art itself, that could be considered spiritual. They believed each god was to be held sacred to the human ideal that each god represensts, and could channel hat quality through the expression of art. To demonstrate the qualities the gods represent, the Greeks created pieces of art to serve as a physical embodiment of their attributes. Theosophists recognize this tradition, as [[Curuppumullage Jinarājadāsa]] comments: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Similarly it is that during those periods of spiritual dryness we can, if we&lt;br /&gt;
have so trained ourselves, commune with God through various forms of Art, for&lt;br /&gt;
Art fundamentally is a revelation of the Divine Nature, it reveals what Plato&lt;br /&gt;
called the Idea or the Archetype. The ancient Greeks were particularly sensitive&lt;br /&gt;
to this aspect of Art. If they looked at a statue of Apollo, the sun-god, it was&lt;br /&gt;
not merely to them a statue of some handsome youth, but there radiated from the&lt;br /&gt;
statue a mysterious influence, so that they came to feel the influence of God.&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly with the goddess Minerva; they felt, when there was an adequately&lt;br /&gt;
beautiful image in a temple, that somehow as they offered their adoration to it,&lt;br /&gt;
the image was like a wonderful window through which they looked into the Divine&lt;br /&gt;
Nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Discourses on the Bhagavad Gita&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1953), 99.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15238</id>
		<title>Greek mythology</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15238"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T16:17:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* H. P. Blavatsky and Greek Myths */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Greek Mythology&#039;&#039;&#039; is the polytheistic myths and legends beliefs of the ancient Greeks. Ancient Greeks often relied on myths and legends to explain their natural world, such as the change of seasons. Largely inspiring Etruscan and Roman mythology, Greek legends  and symbolism remain well known throughout the world today. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Primary Gods and Legends==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Greek mythology, there are many other demi-gods and heros, but the most well known gods are the immortals who sit upon the thrones of Mt. Olympus. The Olympian gods represent a specific natural element or energy force. They are the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Zeus]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the heavens, or as later mythology would determine, the God of the Gods (Roman Name is Jupiter)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Posiedon&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the seas, who would challenge Athena for the title of patron of Athens (Roman Name is Neptune)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Hades]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the underworld, whom oversaw the sould of the mortally deceased (Roman Name is Pluto) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hera&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of marriage, who served as Zeus&#039; primary and exceedingly jelous wife (Roman Name is Juno) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Demeter&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the harvest, whose daughter was the delicate Persephone (Roman Name is Ceres)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hestia&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the hearth, who tends Mt. Olympus&#039; sacred fire (Roman Name is Vesta) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hephaestus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of blacksmiths and craftsmen, who forged lightning bolts for Zeus (Roman Name is Vulcan)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Athena]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of wisdom, who became the patroness of Athens (Roman Name is [[Minerva]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Artemis&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of hunting and wilderness, who was the twin sister of Apollo (Roman Name is Diana)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Apollo&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of music and light, who was the twin brother of Artemis (Roman Name is Apollo)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Ares&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of war, who was quite reckless in his sides and choices in battle (Roman Name is Mars)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Aphrodite&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of love, who rose from the botton of the sea (Roman Name is Venus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hermes&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of theives and trickery, who also served as a messenger of the Gods (Roman Name is Mercury)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Dionysus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of winemaking and festival, who also has been metaphorically compared to Jesus Christ (Roman Name is Bacchus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Persephone&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess-daughter of Demeter, who also served as the queen of the underworld (Roman Name is Proserpina)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are various other deities, which include the Titans (Cronus, [[Prometheus]], and Epimetheus) and  demi-gods (Pan, Orion, and Minos). The heros of Greek myth and legend are also quite known, as Heracles, Odysseus, Perseus, Theseus, and Achilles have remained highly popular myths.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H. P. Blavatsky and Greek Myths==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] references Greek myths and legends often throughout [[The Theosophical Glossary (book)|&#039;&#039;Theosophical Glossary&#039;&#039;]] and [[Isis Unveiled (book)|&#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled&#039;&#039;]]. She remarks that the original truth of Greek myths hold significant understanding of the [[Phenomena]] of the universe. H. P. Blavatsky elaborated in [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]]:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;For a myth, in Greek mythos, means oral tradition, passed from mouth to mouth from one generation to the other; and even in the modern etymology the term stands for a fabulous statement conveying some important truth; a tale of some extraordinary personage whose biography has become overgrown, owing to the veneration of successive generations, with rich popular fancy, but which is no wholesale fable. Like our ancestors, the primitive Aryans, we believe firmly in the personality and intelligence of more than one phenomenon-producing Force in nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. I&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), 425.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also comments on Greek mythology&#039;s greater archetypal meanings for humanity. In regards to the story of [[Prometheus]], Blavatsky extends the condition of Prometheus to the whole experience of collective humanity. She uses Prometheus as a metaphor for the virtues of man, which include the intellect and ambition. She writes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The Titan is more than a thief of the celestial fire. He is a representation of humanity-active, industrious, intelligent, but at the same time ambitious, which aims at equalling divine powers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 525.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anthropomorphism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In traditional Greek mythology, the gods inhabit bodies that display the vices and virtues that are seen in the lower states of man. Many [[Theosophists]] believe the reason for the anthropomorphism of the gods is to give them the full spectrum of the human experience, including the sensual desires. As [[Alvin Boyd Kuhn]] remarks:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The dark night of the soul,&amp;quot; no less than the Götterdämmerung, was, in the&lt;br /&gt;
ancient mind, just the condition of the soul&#039;s embodiment in physical forms.&lt;br /&gt;
Taylor reasons that Minerva (the rational faculty, as Goddess of Wisdom) was by&lt;br /&gt;
her attachment to body given wholly &amp;quot;to the dangerous employment and abandons&lt;br /&gt;
the proper characteristics of her nature for the destructive revels of desire.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
All this is the dialectic statement of the main theme of ancient theology - the&lt;br /&gt;
incarnation of the godlike intellect and divine soul in the darksome conditions&lt;br /&gt;
of animal bodies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kuhn, Alvin Boyd. &#039;&#039;The Lost Light: An Interpretation of Ancient Scriptures&#039;&#039; (Rahway, NJ: Quinn &amp;amp; Boden Company, 1940), 146.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though many Theosophists describe the human condition of the gods as degrading, [[Annie Besant]] describes the anthropomorphism as an inspiration towards the individual experience of man. She accounts that the fall and triumph of the Greek Olympians serve as a metaphor to man&#039;s ability to rise above the errors of his way. She notes:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;That one who falls thus may quickly rise again is encouraging. That old Greek allegory in which every time that the hero falls to earth, worsted in the conflict, he gains new strength from it, applies to man.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Besant, Annie. &#039;&#039;Talks on the Path of Occultism: Vol. II The Voice of The Silence&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1965), 154.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Importance of Mythology==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In ancient Greece, mythology was revered by the Greeks as a form of art itself. They believed each god should be held sacred for the human ideal that each god represensts. To demonstrate the qualities the gods represent, the Greeks created pieces of art to serve as a physical embodiment of their attributes. Theosophists recognize this tradition, as [[Curuppumullage Jinarājadāsa]] comments: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Similarly it is that during those periods of spiritual dryness we can, if we&lt;br /&gt;
have so trained ourselves, commune with God through various forms of Art, for&lt;br /&gt;
Art fundamentally is a revelation of the Divine Nature, it reveals what Plato&lt;br /&gt;
called the Idea or the Archetype. The ancient Greeks were particularly sensitive&lt;br /&gt;
to this aspect of Art. If they looked at a statue of Apollo, the sun-god, it was&lt;br /&gt;
not merely to them a statue of some handsome youth, but there radiated from the&lt;br /&gt;
statue a mysterious influence, so that they came to feel the influence of God.&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly with the goddess Minerva; they felt, when there was an adequately&lt;br /&gt;
beautiful image in a temple, that somehow as they offered their adoration to it,&lt;br /&gt;
the image was like a wonderful window through which they looked into the Divine&lt;br /&gt;
Nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Discourses on the Bhagavad Gita&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1953), 99.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15237</id>
		<title>Greek mythology</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15237"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T16:13:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* H. P. Blavatsky and Greek Myths */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Greek Mythology&#039;&#039;&#039; is the polytheistic myths and legends beliefs of the ancient Greeks. Ancient Greeks often relied on myths and legends to explain their natural world, such as the change of seasons. Largely inspiring Etruscan and Roman mythology, Greek legends  and symbolism remain well known throughout the world today. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Primary Gods and Legends==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Greek mythology, there are many other demi-gods and heros, but the most well known gods are the immortals who sit upon the thrones of Mt. Olympus. The Olympian gods represent a specific natural element or energy force. They are the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Zeus]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the heavens, or as later mythology would determine, the God of the Gods (Roman Name is Jupiter)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Posiedon&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the seas, who would challenge Athena for the title of patron of Athens (Roman Name is Neptune)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Hades]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the underworld, whom oversaw the sould of the mortally deceased (Roman Name is Pluto) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hera&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of marriage, who served as Zeus&#039; primary and exceedingly jelous wife (Roman Name is Juno) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Demeter&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the harvest, whose daughter was the delicate Persephone (Roman Name is Ceres)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hestia&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the hearth, who tends Mt. Olympus&#039; sacred fire (Roman Name is Vesta) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hephaestus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of blacksmiths and craftsmen, who forged lightning bolts for Zeus (Roman Name is Vulcan)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Athena]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of wisdom, who became the patroness of Athens (Roman Name is [[Minerva]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Artemis&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of hunting and wilderness, who was the twin sister of Apollo (Roman Name is Diana)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Apollo&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of music and light, who was the twin brother of Artemis (Roman Name is Apollo)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Ares&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of war, who was quite reckless in his sides and choices in battle (Roman Name is Mars)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Aphrodite&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of love, who rose from the botton of the sea (Roman Name is Venus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hermes&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of theives and trickery, who also served as a messenger of the Gods (Roman Name is Mercury)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Dionysus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of winemaking and festival, who also has been metaphorically compared to Jesus Christ (Roman Name is Bacchus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Persephone&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess-daughter of Demeter, who also served as the queen of the underworld (Roman Name is Proserpina)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are various other deities, which include the Titans (Cronus, [[Prometheus]], and Epimetheus) and  demi-gods (Pan, Orion, and Minos). The heros of Greek myth and legend are also quite known, as Heracles, Odysseus, Perseus, Theseus, and Achilles have remained highly popular myths.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H. P. Blavatsky and Greek Myths==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] references Greek myths and legends often throughout [[The Theosophical Glossary (book)|&#039;&#039;Theosophical Glossary&#039;&#039;]] and [[Isis Unveiled (book)|&#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled&#039;&#039;]]. She remarks that the original truth of Greek myths hold significant understanding of the phenomenon of the universe. H. P. Blavatsky elaborated in [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]]:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;For a myth, in Greek mythos, means oral tradition, passed from mouth to mouth from one generation to the other; and even in the modern etymology the term stands for a fabulous statement conveying some important truth; a tale of some extraordinary personage whose biography has become overgrown, owing to the veneration of successive generations, with rich popular fancy, but which is no wholesale fable. Like our ancestors, the primitive Aryans, we believe firmly in the personality and intelligence of more than one phenomenon-producing Force in nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. I&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), 425.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also comments on Greek mythology&#039;s greater archetypal meanings for humanity. In regards to the story of [[Prometheus]], Blavatsky extends the condition of Prometheus to the whole experience of collective humanity. She uses Prometheus as a metaphor for the virtues of man, which include the intellect and ambition. She writes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The Titan is more than a thief of the celestial fire. He is a representation of humanity-active, industrious, intelligent, but at the same time ambitious, which aims at equalling divine powers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 525.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anthropomorphism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In traditional Greek mythology, the gods inhabit bodies that display the vices and virtues that are seen in the lower states of man. Many [[Theosophists]] believe the reason for the anthropomorphism of the gods is to give them the full spectrum of the human experience, including the sensual desires. As [[Alvin Boyd Kuhn]] remarks:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The dark night of the soul,&amp;quot; no less than the Götterdämmerung, was, in the&lt;br /&gt;
ancient mind, just the condition of the soul&#039;s embodiment in physical forms.&lt;br /&gt;
Taylor reasons that Minerva (the rational faculty, as Goddess of Wisdom) was by&lt;br /&gt;
her attachment to body given wholly &amp;quot;to the dangerous employment and abandons&lt;br /&gt;
the proper characteristics of her nature for the destructive revels of desire.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
All this is the dialectic statement of the main theme of ancient theology - the&lt;br /&gt;
incarnation of the godlike intellect and divine soul in the darksome conditions&lt;br /&gt;
of animal bodies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kuhn, Alvin Boyd. &#039;&#039;The Lost Light: An Interpretation of Ancient Scriptures&#039;&#039; (Rahway, NJ: Quinn &amp;amp; Boden Company, 1940), 146.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though many Theosophists describe the human condition of the gods as degrading, [[Annie Besant]] describes the anthropomorphism as an inspiration towards the individual experience of man. She accounts that the fall and triumph of the Greek Olympians serve as a metaphor to man&#039;s ability to rise above the errors of his way. She notes:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;That one who falls thus may quickly rise again is encouraging. That old Greek allegory in which every time that the hero falls to earth, worsted in the conflict, he gains new strength from it, applies to man.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Besant, Annie. &#039;&#039;Talks on the Path of Occultism: Vol. II The Voice of The Silence&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1965), 154.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Importance of Mythology==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In ancient Greece, mythology was revered by the Greeks as a form of art itself. They believed each god should be held sacred for the human ideal that each god represensts. To demonstrate the qualities the gods represent, the Greeks created pieces of art to serve as a physical embodiment of their attributes. Theosophists recognize this tradition, as [[Curuppumullage Jinarājadāsa]] comments: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Similarly it is that during those periods of spiritual dryness we can, if we&lt;br /&gt;
have so trained ourselves, commune with God through various forms of Art, for&lt;br /&gt;
Art fundamentally is a revelation of the Divine Nature, it reveals what Plato&lt;br /&gt;
called the Idea or the Archetype. The ancient Greeks were particularly sensitive&lt;br /&gt;
to this aspect of Art. If they looked at a statue of Apollo, the sun-god, it was&lt;br /&gt;
not merely to them a statue of some handsome youth, but there radiated from the&lt;br /&gt;
statue a mysterious influence, so that they came to feel the influence of God.&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly with the goddess Minerva; they felt, when there was an adequately&lt;br /&gt;
beautiful image in a temple, that somehow as they offered their adoration to it,&lt;br /&gt;
the image was like a wonderful window through which they looked into the Divine&lt;br /&gt;
Nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Discourses on the Bhagavad Gita&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1953), 99.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15236</id>
		<title>Greek mythology</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15236"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T16:12:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Greek Mythology&#039;&#039;&#039; is the polytheistic myths and legends beliefs of the ancient Greeks. Ancient Greeks often relied on myths and legends to explain their natural world, such as the change of seasons. Largely inspiring Etruscan and Roman mythology, Greek legends  and symbolism remain well known throughout the world today. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Primary Gods and Legends==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Greek mythology, there are many other demi-gods and heros, but the most well known gods are the immortals who sit upon the thrones of Mt. Olympus. The Olympian gods represent a specific natural element or energy force. They are the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Zeus]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the heavens, or as later mythology would determine, the God of the Gods (Roman Name is Jupiter)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Posiedon&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the seas, who would challenge Athena for the title of patron of Athens (Roman Name is Neptune)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Hades]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the underworld, whom oversaw the sould of the mortally deceased (Roman Name is Pluto) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hera&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of marriage, who served as Zeus&#039; primary and exceedingly jelous wife (Roman Name is Juno) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Demeter&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the harvest, whose daughter was the delicate Persephone (Roman Name is Ceres)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hestia&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the hearth, who tends Mt. Olympus&#039; sacred fire (Roman Name is Vesta) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hephaestus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of blacksmiths and craftsmen, who forged lightning bolts for Zeus (Roman Name is Vulcan)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Athena]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of wisdom, who became the patroness of Athens (Roman Name is [[Minerva]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Artemis&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of hunting and wilderness, who was the twin sister of Apollo (Roman Name is Diana)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Apollo&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of music and light, who was the twin brother of Artemis (Roman Name is Apollo)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Ares&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of war, who was quite reckless in his sides and choices in battle (Roman Name is Mars)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Aphrodite&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of love, who rose from the botton of the sea (Roman Name is Venus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hermes&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of theives and trickery, who also served as a messenger of the Gods (Roman Name is Mercury)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Dionysus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of winemaking and festival, who also has been metaphorically compared to Jesus Christ (Roman Name is Bacchus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Persephone&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess-daughter of Demeter, who also served as the queen of the underworld (Roman Name is Proserpina)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are various other deities, which include the Titans (Cronus, [[Prometheus]], and Epimetheus) and  demi-gods (Pan, Orion, and Minos). The heros of Greek myth and legend are also quite known, as Heracles, Odysseus, Perseus, Theseus, and Achilles have remained highly popular myths.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H. P. Blavatsky and Greek Myths==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] references Greek myths and legends often throughout [[The Theosophical Glossary (book)|&#039;&#039;Theosophical Glossary&#039;&#039;]] and [[Isis Unveiled (book)|&#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled&#039;&#039;]]. She remarks that the original truth of Greek myths hold significant understanding of the phenomenon of the universe. H. P. Blavatsky elaborated in [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]]:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;For a myth, in Greek mythos, means oral tradition, passed from mouth to mouth from one generation to the other; and even in the modern etymology the term stands for a fabulous statement conveying some important truth; a tale of some extraordinary personage whose biography has become overgrown, owing to the veneration of successive generations, with rich popular fancy, but which is no wholesale fable. Like our ancestors, the primitive Aryans, we believe firmly in the personality and intelligence of more than one phenomenon-producing Force in nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. I&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), 425.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also comments on Greek mythology&#039;s greater archetypal meanings for humanity. In regards to the story of [[Prometheus]], Blavatsky extends the condition of Prometheus to the whole experience of collective humanity. She uses Prometheus as a metaphor for the virtues of man, which include the intellect and ambition. She writes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The Titan is more than a thief of the celestial fire. He is a representation of humanity-active, industrious, intelligent, but at the same time ambitious, which aims at equalling divine powers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. II (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 525.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anthropomorphism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In traditional Greek mythology, the gods inhabit bodies that display the vices and virtues that are seen in the lower states of man. Many [[Theosophists]] believe the reason for the anthropomorphism of the gods is to give them the full spectrum of the human experience, including the sensual desires. As [[Alvin Boyd Kuhn]] remarks:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The dark night of the soul,&amp;quot; no less than the Götterdämmerung, was, in the&lt;br /&gt;
ancient mind, just the condition of the soul&#039;s embodiment in physical forms.&lt;br /&gt;
Taylor reasons that Minerva (the rational faculty, as Goddess of Wisdom) was by&lt;br /&gt;
her attachment to body given wholly &amp;quot;to the dangerous employment and abandons&lt;br /&gt;
the proper characteristics of her nature for the destructive revels of desire.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
All this is the dialectic statement of the main theme of ancient theology - the&lt;br /&gt;
incarnation of the godlike intellect and divine soul in the darksome conditions&lt;br /&gt;
of animal bodies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kuhn, Alvin Boyd. &#039;&#039;The Lost Light: An Interpretation of Ancient Scriptures&#039;&#039; (Rahway, NJ: Quinn &amp;amp; Boden Company, 1940), 146.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though many Theosophists describe the human condition of the gods as degrading, [[Annie Besant]] describes the anthropomorphism as an inspiration towards the individual experience of man. She accounts that the fall and triumph of the Greek Olympians serve as a metaphor to man&#039;s ability to rise above the errors of his way. She notes:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;That one who falls thus may quickly rise again is encouraging. That old Greek allegory in which every time that the hero falls to earth, worsted in the conflict, he gains new strength from it, applies to man.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Besant, Annie. &#039;&#039;Talks on the Path of Occultism: Vol. II The Voice of The Silence&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1965), 154.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Importance of Mythology==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In ancient Greece, mythology was revered by the Greeks as a form of art itself. They believed each god should be held sacred for the human ideal that each god represensts. To demonstrate the qualities the gods represent, the Greeks created pieces of art to serve as a physical embodiment of their attributes. Theosophists recognize this tradition, as [[Curuppumullage Jinarājadāsa]] comments: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Similarly it is that during those periods of spiritual dryness we can, if we&lt;br /&gt;
have so trained ourselves, commune with God through various forms of Art, for&lt;br /&gt;
Art fundamentally is a revelation of the Divine Nature, it reveals what Plato&lt;br /&gt;
called the Idea or the Archetype. The ancient Greeks were particularly sensitive&lt;br /&gt;
to this aspect of Art. If they looked at a statue of Apollo, the sun-god, it was&lt;br /&gt;
not merely to them a statue of some handsome youth, but there radiated from the&lt;br /&gt;
statue a mysterious influence, so that they came to feel the influence of God.&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly with the goddess Minerva; they felt, when there was an adequately&lt;br /&gt;
beautiful image in a temple, that somehow as they offered their adoration to it,&lt;br /&gt;
the image was like a wonderful window through which they looked into the Divine&lt;br /&gt;
Nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Discourses on the Bhagavad Gita&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1953), 99.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15235</id>
		<title>Greek mythology</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15235"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T16:06:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* H. P. Blavatsky and Greek Myths */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Greek Mythology&#039;&#039;&#039; is the polytheistic myths and legends beliefs of the ancient Greeks. Ancient Greeks often relied on myths and legends to explain their natural world, such as the change of seasons. Largely inspiring Etruscan and Roman mythology, Greek legends  and symbolism remain popular in culture today. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Primary Gods and Legends==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Greek mythology, there are many other demi-gods and heros, but the most well known gods are the immortals who sit upon the thrones of Mt. Olympus. The Olympian gods represent a specific natural element or energy force. They are the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Zeus]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the heavens, or as later mythology would determine, the God of the Gods (Roman Name is Jupiter)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Posiedon&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the seas, who would challenge Athena for the title of patron of Athens (Roman Name is Neptune)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Hades]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the underworld, whom oversaw the sould of the mortally deceased (Roman Name is Pluto) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hera&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of marriage, who served as Zeus&#039; primary and exceedingly jelous wife (Roman Name is Juno) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Demeter&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the harvest, whose daughter was the delicate Persephone (Roman Name is Ceres)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hestia&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the hearth, who tends Mt. Olympus&#039; sacred fire (Roman Name is Vesta) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hephaestus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of blacksmiths and craftsmen, who forged lightning bolts for Zeus (Roman Name is Vulcan)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Athena]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of wisdom, who became the patroness of Athens (Roman Name is [[Minerva]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Artemis&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of hunting and wilderness, who was the twin sister of Apollo (Roman Name is Diana)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Apollo&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of music and light, who was the twin brother of Artemis (Roman Name is Apollo)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Ares&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of war, who was quite reckless in his sides and choices in battle (Roman Name is Mars)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Aphrodite&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of love, who rose from the botton of the sea (Roman Name is Venus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hermes&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of theives and trickery, who also served as a messenger of the Gods (Roman Name is Mercury)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Dionysus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of winemaking and festival, who also has been metaphorically compared to Jesus Christ (Roman Name is Bacchus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Persephone&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess-daughter of Demeter, who also served as the queen of the underworld (Roman Name is Proserpina)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are various other deities, which include the Titans (Cronus, [[Prometheus]], and Epimetheus) and  demi-gods (Pan, Orion, and Minos). The heros of Greek myth and legend are also quite known, as Heracles, Odysseus, Perseus, Theseus, and Achilles have remained highly popular myths.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H. P. Blavatsky and Greek Myths==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] references Greek myths and legends often throughout [[The Theosophical Glossary (book)|&#039;&#039;Theosophical Glossary&#039;&#039;]] and [[Isis Unveiled (book)|&#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled&#039;&#039;]]. She remarks that the original truth of Greek myths hold significant understanding of the phenomenon of the universe. H. P. Blavatsky elaborated in [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]]:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;For a myth, in Greek mythos, means oral tradition, passed from mouth to mouth from one generation to the other; and even in the modern etymology the term stands for a fabulous statement conveying some important truth; a tale of some extraordinary personage whose biography has become overgrown, owing to the veneration of successive generations, with rich popular fancy, but which is no wholesale fable. Like our ancestors, the primitive Aryans, we believe firmly in the personality and intelligence of more than one phenomenon-producing Force in nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. I&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), 425.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also comments on Greek mythology&#039;s greater archetypal meanings for humanity. In regards to the story of [[Prometheus]], Blavatsky extends the condition of Prometheus to the whole experience of collective humanity. She writes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The Titan is more than a thief of the celestial fire. He is a representation of humanity-active, industrious, intelligent, but at the same time ambitious, which aims at equalling divine powers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. II (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 525.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anthropomorphism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In traditional Greek mythology, the gods inhabit bodies that display the vices and virtues that are seen in the lower states of man. Many [[Theosophists]] believe the reason for the anthropomorphism of the gods is to give them the full spectrum of the human experience, including the sensual desires. As [[Alvin Boyd Kuhn]] remarks:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The dark night of the soul,&amp;quot; no less than the Götterdämmerung, was, in the&lt;br /&gt;
ancient mind, just the condition of the soul&#039;s embodiment in physical forms.&lt;br /&gt;
Taylor reasons that Minerva (the rational faculty, as Goddess of Wisdom) was by&lt;br /&gt;
her attachment to body given wholly &amp;quot;to the dangerous employment and abandons&lt;br /&gt;
the proper characteristics of her nature for the destructive revels of desire.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
All this is the dialectic statement of the main theme of ancient theology - the&lt;br /&gt;
incarnation of the godlike intellect and divine soul in the darksome conditions&lt;br /&gt;
of animal bodies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kuhn, Alvin Boyd. &#039;&#039;The Lost Light: An Interpretation of Ancient Scriptures&#039;&#039; (Rahway, NJ: Quinn &amp;amp; Boden Company, 1940), 146.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though many Theosophists describe the human condition of the gods as degrading, [[Annie Besant]] describes the anthropomorphism as an inspiration towards the individual experience of man. She accounts that the fall and triumph of the Greek Olympians serve as a metaphor to man&#039;s ability to rise above the errors of his way. She notes:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;That one who falls thus may quickly rise again is encouraging. That old Greek allegory in which every time that the hero falls to earth, worsted in the conflict, he gains new strength from it, applies to man.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Besant, Annie. &#039;&#039;Talks on the Path of Occultism: Vol. II The Voice of The Silence&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1965), 154.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Importance of Mythology==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In ancient Greece, mythology was revered by the Greeks as a form of art itself. They believed each god should be held sacred for the human ideal that each god represensts. To demonstrate the qualities the gods represent, the Greeks created pieces of art to serve as a physical embodiment of their attributes. Theosophists recognize this tradition, as [[Curuppumullage Jinarājadāsa]] comments: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Similarly it is that during those periods of spiritual dryness we can, if we&lt;br /&gt;
have so trained ourselves, commune with God through various forms of Art, for&lt;br /&gt;
Art fundamentally is a revelation of the Divine Nature, it reveals what Plato&lt;br /&gt;
called the Idea or the Archetype. The ancient Greeks were particularly sensitive&lt;br /&gt;
to this aspect of Art. If they looked at a statue of Apollo, the sun-god, it was&lt;br /&gt;
not merely to them a statue of some handsome youth, but there radiated from the&lt;br /&gt;
statue a mysterious influence, so that they came to feel the influence of God.&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly with the goddess Minerva; they felt, when there was an adequately&lt;br /&gt;
beautiful image in a temple, that somehow as they offered their adoration to it,&lt;br /&gt;
the image was like a wonderful window through which they looked into the Divine&lt;br /&gt;
Nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Discourses on the Bhagavad Gita&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1953), 99.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15234</id>
		<title>Greek mythology</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15234"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T16:03:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Primary Gods and Legends */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Greek Mythology&#039;&#039;&#039; is the polytheistic myths and legends beliefs of the ancient Greeks. Ancient Greeks often relied on myths and legends to explain their natural world, such as the change of seasons. Largely inspiring Etruscan and Roman mythology, Greek legends  and symbolism remain popular in culture today. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Primary Gods and Legends==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Greek mythology, there are many other demi-gods and heros, but the most well known gods are the immortals who sit upon the thrones of Mt. Olympus. The Olympian gods represent a specific natural element or energy force. They are the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Zeus]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the heavens, or as later mythology would determine, the God of the Gods (Roman Name is Jupiter)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Posiedon&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the seas, who would challenge Athena for the title of patron of Athens (Roman Name is Neptune)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Hades]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the underworld, whom oversaw the sould of the mortally deceased (Roman Name is Pluto) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hera&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of marriage, who served as Zeus&#039; primary and exceedingly jelous wife (Roman Name is Juno) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Demeter&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the harvest, whose daughter was the delicate Persephone (Roman Name is Ceres)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hestia&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the hearth, who tends Mt. Olympus&#039; sacred fire (Roman Name is Vesta) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hephaestus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of blacksmiths and craftsmen, who forged lightning bolts for Zeus (Roman Name is Vulcan)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Athena]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of wisdom, who became the patroness of Athens (Roman Name is [[Minerva]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Artemis&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of hunting and wilderness, who was the twin sister of Apollo (Roman Name is Diana)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Apollo&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of music and light, who was the twin brother of Artemis (Roman Name is Apollo)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Ares&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of war, who was quite reckless in his sides and choices in battle (Roman Name is Mars)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Aphrodite&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of love, who rose from the botton of the sea (Roman Name is Venus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hermes&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of theives and trickery, who also served as a messenger of the Gods (Roman Name is Mercury)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Dionysus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of winemaking and festival, who also has been metaphorically compared to Jesus Christ (Roman Name is Bacchus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Persephone&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess-daughter of Demeter, who also served as the queen of the underworld (Roman Name is Proserpina)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are various other deities, which include the Titans (Cronus, [[Prometheus]], and Epimetheus) and  demi-gods (Pan, Orion, and Minos). The heros of Greek myth and legend are also quite known, as Heracles, Odysseus, Perseus, Theseus, and Achilles have remained highly popular myths.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H. P. Blavatsky and Greek Myths==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] references Greek myths and legends often throughout [[The Theosophical Glossary (book)|&#039;&#039;Theosophical Glossary&#039;&#039;]] and [[Isis Unveiled (book)|&#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled&#039;&#039;]]. She remarks that the original truth of Greek myths hold significant understanding of the phenomenon of the universe. H. P. Blavatsky elaborated in [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]]:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;For a myth, in Greek mythos, means oral tradition, passed from mouth to mouth from one generation to the other; and even in the modern etymology the term stands for a fabulous statement conveying some important truth; a tale of some extraordinary personage whose biography has become overgrown, owing to the veneration of successive generations, with rich popular fancy, but which is no wholesale fable. Like our ancestors, the primitive Aryans, we believe firmly in the personality and intelligence of more than one phenomenon-producing Force in nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. I&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), 425.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also comments on the deeper meaning of the ancient Greek myths, and their greater archetypal meanings for humanity. In regards to the story of [[Prometheus]], Blavatsky extends the condition of Prometheus to the whole experience of collective humanity. She writes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The Titan is more than a thief of the celestial fire. He is a representation of humanity-active, industrious, intelligent, but at the same time ambitious, which aims at equalling divine powers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. II (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 525.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anthropomorphism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In traditional Greek mythology, the gods inhabit bodies that display the vices and virtues that are seen in the lower states of man. Many [[Theosophists]] believe the reason for the anthropomorphism of the gods is to give them the full spectrum of the human experience, including the sensual desires. As [[Alvin Boyd Kuhn]] remarks:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The dark night of the soul,&amp;quot; no less than the Götterdämmerung, was, in the&lt;br /&gt;
ancient mind, just the condition of the soul&#039;s embodiment in physical forms.&lt;br /&gt;
Taylor reasons that Minerva (the rational faculty, as Goddess of Wisdom) was by&lt;br /&gt;
her attachment to body given wholly &amp;quot;to the dangerous employment and abandons&lt;br /&gt;
the proper characteristics of her nature for the destructive revels of desire.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
All this is the dialectic statement of the main theme of ancient theology - the&lt;br /&gt;
incarnation of the godlike intellect and divine soul in the darksome conditions&lt;br /&gt;
of animal bodies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kuhn, Alvin Boyd. &#039;&#039;The Lost Light: An Interpretation of Ancient Scriptures&#039;&#039; (Rahway, NJ: Quinn &amp;amp; Boden Company, 1940), 146.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though many Theosophists describe the human condition of the gods as degrading, [[Annie Besant]] describes the anthropomorphism as an inspiration towards the individual experience of man. She accounts that the fall and triumph of the Greek Olympians serve as a metaphor to man&#039;s ability to rise above the errors of his way. She notes:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;That one who falls thus may quickly rise again is encouraging. That old Greek allegory in which every time that the hero falls to earth, worsted in the conflict, he gains new strength from it, applies to man.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Besant, Annie. &#039;&#039;Talks on the Path of Occultism: Vol. II The Voice of The Silence&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1965), 154.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Importance of Mythology==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In ancient Greece, mythology was revered by the Greeks as a form of art itself. They believed each god should be held sacred for the human ideal that each god represensts. To demonstrate the qualities the gods represent, the Greeks created pieces of art to serve as a physical embodiment of their attributes. Theosophists recognize this tradition, as [[Curuppumullage Jinarājadāsa]] comments: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Similarly it is that during those periods of spiritual dryness we can, if we&lt;br /&gt;
have so trained ourselves, commune with God through various forms of Art, for&lt;br /&gt;
Art fundamentally is a revelation of the Divine Nature, it reveals what Plato&lt;br /&gt;
called the Idea or the Archetype. The ancient Greeks were particularly sensitive&lt;br /&gt;
to this aspect of Art. If they looked at a statue of Apollo, the sun-god, it was&lt;br /&gt;
not merely to them a statue of some handsome youth, but there radiated from the&lt;br /&gt;
statue a mysterious influence, so that they came to feel the influence of God.&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly with the goddess Minerva; they felt, when there was an adequately&lt;br /&gt;
beautiful image in a temple, that somehow as they offered their adoration to it,&lt;br /&gt;
the image was like a wonderful window through which they looked into the Divine&lt;br /&gt;
Nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Discourses on the Bhagavad Gita&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1953), 99.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15233</id>
		<title>Greek mythology</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15233"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T16:01:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* H. P. Blavatsky and Greek Myths */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Greek Mythology&#039;&#039;&#039; is the polytheistic myths and legends beliefs of the ancient Greeks. Ancient Greeks often relied on myths and legends to explain their natural world, such as the change of seasons. Largely inspiring Etruscan and Roman mythology, Greek legends  and symbolism remain popular in culture today. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Primary Gods and Legends==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Greek mythology, there are many other demi-gods and heros, but the most well known gods are the immortals who sit upon the thrones of Mt. Olympus. The Olympian gods represent a specific natural element or energy force. They are the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Zeus]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the heavens, or as later mythology would determine, the God of the Gods (Roman Name is Jupiter)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Posiedon&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the seas, who would challenge Athena for the title of patron of Athens (Roman Name is Neptune)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Hades]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the underworld, whom oversaw the sould of the mortally deceased (Roman Name is Pluto) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hera&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of marriage, who served as Zeus&#039; primary and exceedingly jelous wife (Roman Name is Juno) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Demeter&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the harvest, whose daughter was the delicate Persephone (Roman Name is Ceres)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hestia&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the hearth, who tends Mt. Olympus&#039; sacred fire (Roman Name is Vesta) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hephaestus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of blacksmiths and craftsmen, who forged lightning bolts for Zeus (Roman Name is Vulcan)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Athena]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of wisdom, who became the patroness of Athens (Roman Name is [[Minerva]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Artemis&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of hunting and wilderness, who was the twin sister of Apollo (Roman Name is Diana)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Apollo&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of music and light, who was the twin brother of Artemis (Roman Name is Apollo)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Ares&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of war, who was quite reckless in his sides and choices in battle (Roman Name is Mars)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Aphrodite&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of love, who rose from the botton of the sea (Roman Name is Venus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hermes&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of theives and trickery, who also served as a messenger of the Gods (Roman Name is Mercury)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Dionysus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of winemaking and festival, who also has been metaphorically compared to Jesus Christ (Roman Name is Bacchus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Persephone&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess-daughter of Demeter, who also served as the queen of the underworld (Roman Name is Proserpina)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are various other deities, which include the Titans (Cronus, [[Prometheus]], and Epimetheus) and  demi-gods (Pan, Orion, and Minos). The heros of Greek myth and legend are also quite known, with Heracles, Odysseus, Perseus, Theseus, and Achilles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H. P. Blavatsky and Greek Myths==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] references Greek myths and legends often throughout [[The Theosophical Glossary (book)|&#039;&#039;Theosophical Glossary&#039;&#039;]] and [[Isis Unveiled (book)|&#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled&#039;&#039;]]. She remarks that the original truth of Greek myths hold significant understanding of the phenomenon of the universe. H. P. Blavatsky elaborated in [[The Secret Doctrine (book)| &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;]]:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;For a myth, in Greek mythos, means oral tradition, passed from mouth to mouth from one generation to the other; and even in the modern etymology the term stands for a fabulous statement conveying some important truth; a tale of some extraordinary personage whose biography has become overgrown, owing to the veneration of successive generations, with rich popular fancy, but which is no wholesale fable. Like our ancestors, the primitive Aryans, we believe firmly in the personality and intelligence of more than one phenomenon-producing Force in nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. I&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), 425.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also comments on the deeper meaning of the ancient Greek myths, and their greater archetypal meanings for humanity. In regards to the story of [[Prometheus]], Blavatsky extends the condition of Prometheus to the whole experience of collective humanity. She writes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The Titan is more than a thief of the celestial fire. He is a representation of humanity-active, industrious, intelligent, but at the same time ambitious, which aims at equalling divine powers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. II (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 525.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anthropomorphism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In traditional Greek mythology, the gods inhabit bodies that display the vices and virtues that are seen in the lower states of man. Many [[Theosophists]] believe the reason for the anthropomorphism of the gods is to give them the full spectrum of the human experience, including the sensual desires. As [[Alvin Boyd Kuhn]] remarks:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The dark night of the soul,&amp;quot; no less than the Götterdämmerung, was, in the&lt;br /&gt;
ancient mind, just the condition of the soul&#039;s embodiment in physical forms.&lt;br /&gt;
Taylor reasons that Minerva (the rational faculty, as Goddess of Wisdom) was by&lt;br /&gt;
her attachment to body given wholly &amp;quot;to the dangerous employment and abandons&lt;br /&gt;
the proper characteristics of her nature for the destructive revels of desire.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
All this is the dialectic statement of the main theme of ancient theology - the&lt;br /&gt;
incarnation of the godlike intellect and divine soul in the darksome conditions&lt;br /&gt;
of animal bodies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kuhn, Alvin Boyd. &#039;&#039;The Lost Light: An Interpretation of Ancient Scriptures&#039;&#039; (Rahway, NJ: Quinn &amp;amp; Boden Company, 1940), 146.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though many Theosophists describe the human condition of the gods as degrading, [[Annie Besant]] describes the anthropomorphism as an inspiration towards the individual experience of man. She accounts that the fall and triumph of the Greek Olympians serve as a metaphor to man&#039;s ability to rise above the errors of his way. She notes:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;That one who falls thus may quickly rise again is encouraging. That old Greek allegory in which every time that the hero falls to earth, worsted in the conflict, he gains new strength from it, applies to man.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Besant, Annie. &#039;&#039;Talks on the Path of Occultism: Vol. II The Voice of The Silence&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1965), 154.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Importance of Mythology==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In ancient Greece, mythology was revered by the Greeks as a form of art itself. They believed each god should be held sacred for the human ideal that each god represensts. To demonstrate the qualities the gods represent, the Greeks created pieces of art to serve as a physical embodiment of their attributes. Theosophists recognize this tradition, as [[Curuppumullage Jinarājadāsa]] comments: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Similarly it is that during those periods of spiritual dryness we can, if we&lt;br /&gt;
have so trained ourselves, commune with God through various forms of Art, for&lt;br /&gt;
Art fundamentally is a revelation of the Divine Nature, it reveals what Plato&lt;br /&gt;
called the Idea or the Archetype. The ancient Greeks were particularly sensitive&lt;br /&gt;
to this aspect of Art. If they looked at a statue of Apollo, the sun-god, it was&lt;br /&gt;
not merely to them a statue of some handsome youth, but there radiated from the&lt;br /&gt;
statue a mysterious influence, so that they came to feel the influence of God.&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly with the goddess Minerva; they felt, when there was an adequately&lt;br /&gt;
beautiful image in a temple, that somehow as they offered their adoration to it,&lt;br /&gt;
the image was like a wonderful window through which they looked into the Divine&lt;br /&gt;
Nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Discourses on the Bhagavad Gita&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1953), 99.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Prometheus&amp;diff=22204</id>
		<title>Prometheus</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Prometheus&amp;diff=22204"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T15:58:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* The Legend of Prometheus and H. P. Blavatsky */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Prometheus&#039;&#039;&#039; was a Titan in ancient [[Greek mythology]], who was credited with the creation of man. In order to fully provide for his creations, Prometheus stole fire from Mt. Olympus, but was punished by [[Zeus]] as a result. Prometheus is often analogous to the light-bearers of other ancient cultures.      &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Legend of Prometheus and H. P. Blavatsky==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] refers to Prometheus in the [[The Theosophical Glossary (book)|&#039;&#039;Theosophical Glossary&#039;&#039;]] as the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Prometheus (Gr.). The Greek logos; he, who by bringing on earth divine fire (intelligence and consciousness) endowed men with reason and mind. Prometheus is the Hellenic type of our Kumâras or Egos, those who, by incarnating in men, made of them latent gods instead of animals. The gods (or Elohim) were averse to men becoming “as one of us” (Genesis iii., 22), and knowing “good and evil”. Hence we see these gods in every religious legend punishing man for his desire to know. As the Greek myth has it, for stealing the fire he brought to men from Heaven, Prometheus was chained by the order of Zeus to a crag of the Caucasian Mountains.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;Theosophical Glossary&#039;&#039; (Los Angeles, CA: Theosophical Company, 1973), 263.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Prometheus and Manas==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Theosophy]], Prometheus&#039; flame is seen as the transmission of [[Manas]] to man. It is through Manas alone that man is considered intellectual, which distiguishes the human race from the other members of the animal kingdom: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The Greeks have all this depicted in their great fable of Prometheus stealing the heavenly fire -- which, be it known, is divine intelligence, not the physical flame we cook our suppers with! -- from the gods and bringing it to man for his behoof. It was what the Theosophists call Manas, the spark of thinking intelligence which made &amp;quot;man&amp;quot; a manasic being, or capable of abstract thought.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alvin Boyd Kuhn, &#039;&#039;Theosophy: A Modern Revival of Ancient Wisdom&#039;&#039; (New York: Henry Holt and Co., 1930), ???&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The acts of Prometheus also give man the ability to elevate beyond his capacities. By fostering the Manas into mankind, Prometheus gave man the spiritual ability to become universal beings. To develop this higher intellegence, it is noted that the [[Manvantara]] cycle must have a long duration, as remarked by Gertrude van Pelt:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The story is told in allegory in the myth of Prometheus, who brought the&lt;br /&gt;
spiritual fire from heaven to mortals and was chained to a rock for ages -- the&lt;br /&gt;
rock of matter, which was the animal body. The lacking principle was mind or&lt;br /&gt;
manas, which must have lain sleeping as a germ forever had not Prometheus&lt;br /&gt;
lighted and awakened it with spiritual fire. To quicken it permanently; to make&lt;br /&gt;
a mortal, immortal; to change a dawning intelligence into a god -- for this, a&lt;br /&gt;
long manvantara is needed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;van Pelt, Gertrude W. &#039;&#039;Archaic History of the Human Race&#039;&#039; (San Diego, CA: Point Loma Publications, 1979), 28.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connection to Lucifer==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Legend of Prometheus is often equated to the Story of [[Lucifer]]. Both are the light-bearers, who are punished for their transmission of higher knowledge to man. As [[H. P. Blavatsky]] comments: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The allegory of the Fall of man and the fire of Prometheus is also&lt;br /&gt;
another version of the myth of the rebellion of the proud Lucifer, hurled down&lt;br /&gt;
to the bottomless pit  --  Orcus.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled&#039;&#039; (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1972), 299.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
H. P. Blavatsky also recognizes that Prometheus gave man the knowledge of the gods, so that they could be gods themselves. This threatens Zeus, as man equal in spiritual knowledge with the gods is not tolerated. Thus, Prometheus shares the same fate with [[Satan]]: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt; Hence the allegory of Prometheus, who steals the divine fire so as to allow&lt;br /&gt;
men to proceed consciously on the path of spiritual evolution, thus transforming&lt;br /&gt;
the most perfect of animals on earth into a potential god, and making him free&lt;br /&gt;
to &amp;quot;take the kingdom of heaven by violence.&amp;quot; Hence also, the curse pronounced by&lt;br /&gt;
Zeus against Prometheus, and by Jehovah-Il-da-Baoth against his &amp;quot;rebellious&lt;br /&gt;
son,&amp;quot; Satan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 244.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Relation with Epimetheus==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prometheus (Beforethinker or Forethought) and Epimetheus (Afterthinker or Afterthought) were both Titan brothers who were assigned with the creation of mortal creatures. Using the gifts of the gods, Epimetheus created animals as quickly as he could, giving them the gifts of speed, sight, and strength. Prometheus, conversely, used his time wisely to painstakenly create man, and found his brother had used the majority of the gifts. This led Prometheus to take the light of knowledge from Mt. Olympus to give man the gift of consciousness. As Grace F. Knoche notes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Man the thinker was born: instead of being less qualified than the animals which Epimetheus had so well equipped, he now stood a potential god, conscious of his power, yet&lt;br /&gt;
innately aware that from then on he would have to choose between good and evil,&lt;br /&gt;
and earn the gift Prometheus had brought.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Knoche, Grace F. &#039;&#039;To Light a Thousand Lamps: A Theosophic Vision&#039;&#039; (Pasadena, CA: Theosophical University Press, 2001), 25-26.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Epimetheus also serves as a parallel to Prometheus&#039; intentions. In this definition of Prometheus and Epimetheus, the former is described as altruistic, while the latter is described as egotistical. [[H. P. Blavatsky]] notes that mankind has become comsumed with the Epimetheus condition, and should become aware of their potential to reach the intentions of Prometheus once again. She states:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The modern Prometheus has now become Epi-metheus, &amp;quot;he who sees only after&lt;br /&gt;
the event&amp;quot;; because the universal philanthropy of the former has long ago&lt;br /&gt;
degenerated into selfishness and self-adoration. Man will rebecome the free&lt;br /&gt;
Titan of old, but not before cyclic evolution has re-established the broken&lt;br /&gt;
harmony between the two natures  --  the terrestrial and the divine; after which he&lt;br /&gt;
becomes impermeable to the lower titanic forces, invulnerable in his&lt;br /&gt;
personality, and immortal in his individuality, which cannot happen before every&lt;br /&gt;
animal element is eliminated from his nature. When man understands that &amp;quot;Deus&lt;br /&gt;
non fecit mortem&amp;quot; (Sap. I., 13), but that man has created it himself, he will&lt;br /&gt;
re-become the Prometheus before his Fall.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 422.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Importance of Prometheus in Theosophy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In regards to [[Theosophy]], Prometheus has primarily been to illustrate the struggle between between spirituality and materialism. Prometheus represents the essence of the spiritual being, while the gods represent the brute humanistic urges. As the high intentions of Prometheus are inhibited by the crude behaviors of the gods, Prometheus&#039; choice remains of great interest to many Theosophists, including [[H. P. Blavatsky]]. She remarks:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;This drama of the struggle of Prometheus with the Olympic tyrant&lt;br /&gt;
and despot, sensual Zeus, one sees enacted daily within our actual mankind: the&lt;br /&gt;
lower passions chain the higher aspirations to the rock of matter, to generate&lt;br /&gt;
in many a case the vulture of sorrow, pain, and repentance. In every such case&lt;br /&gt;
one sees once more  -- &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A god . . . in fetters, anguish fraught;&lt;br /&gt;
The foe of Zeus, in hatred held by all. . . . &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
A god, bereft even of that supreme consolation of Prometheus, who suffered&lt;br /&gt;
in self-sacrifice  -- &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;For that to men he bare too fond a mind. . .&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
as the divine Titan is moved by altruism, but the mortal man by Selfishness and&lt;br /&gt;
Egoism in every instance.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 422.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Theosophists do not limit the struggle of materialism and spirituality to the legend of Prometheus. They also extend it into contemporary life, as it is a continuation of the challenge to balance these moral forces. When man had recieved the fire of higher knowledge from Mt. Olympus, they were faced with the responsibility of living with both the divine purpose of Prometheus and the lowly desires of the gods. As commented by [[Alvin Boyd Kuhn]]: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The gift of Prometheus thus became &amp;quot;the chief cause, if not the sole&lt;br /&gt;
origin of evil,&amp;quot; since it joined in an unstable equilibrium in one&lt;br /&gt;
organism the free will and spiritual purity of the angel hosts with the&lt;br /&gt;
heavy surgings of the bestial nature; linked divine aspiration with&lt;br /&gt;
sensual appetence. Theosophists view this situation as the ground of man&#039;s&lt;br /&gt;
whole moral struggle.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alvin Boyd Kuhn, &#039;&#039;Theosophy: A Modern Revival of Ancient Wisdom&#039;&#039; (New York: Henry Holt and Co., 1930), ???&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Name of Prometheus==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Name of Prometheus also takes on an [[Esoteric]] meaning as well. As the legend of Prometheus is a story of man&#039;s creation, the duality of perfection out of imperfection is evident. As Prometheus had chosen to extend his awareness to mankind, he realized that his ability to give man their knowledge of perfection must also come with their knowledge of imperfection. This decision and its consequences have been preserved in the Greek Tradegy, &#039;&#039;Prometheus Bound&#039;&#039;. The drama is cited often in &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;, and has led H. P. Blavatsky to state:        &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;This was left to that class of Devas who became symbolised in Greece under the name of Prometheus, to those who had nought to do with the physical body, yet everything with the purely&lt;br /&gt;
spiritual man...Each class of Creators endows man with what it has to give: the one builds&lt;br /&gt;
his external form; the other gives him its essence, which later on becomes the&lt;br /&gt;
Human Higher Self owing to the personal exertion of the individual; but they&lt;br /&gt;
could not make men as they were themselves  --  perfect, because sinless; sinless,&lt;br /&gt;
because having only the first, pale shadowy outlines of attributes, and these&lt;br /&gt;
all perfect  --  from the human standpoint  --  white, pure and cold as the virgin&lt;br /&gt;
snow. Where there is no struggle, there is no merit; The first&lt;br /&gt;
humanity, therefore, was a pale copy of its progenitors; too material, even in&lt;br /&gt;
its ethereality, to be a hierarchy of gods; too spiritual and pure to be MEN,&lt;br /&gt;
endowed as it is with every negative (Nirguna) perfection. Perfection, to be&lt;br /&gt;
fully such, must be born out of imperfection, the incorruptible must grow out of&lt;br /&gt;
the corruptible, having the latter as its vehicle and basis and contrast.&lt;br /&gt;
Absolute light is absolute darkness, and vice versa.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. II&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 95.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further Reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://theosophy.ph/encyclo/index.php?title=Prometheus# Prometheus] at Theosopedia&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Greek Mythology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Concepts in The Secret Doctrine]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15232</id>
		<title>Greek mythology</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15232"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T15:54:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* H. P. Blavatsky and Greek Myths */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Greek Mythology&#039;&#039;&#039; is the polytheistic myths and legends beliefs of the ancient Greeks. Ancient Greeks often relied on myths and legends to explain their natural world, such as the change of seasons. Largely inspiring Etruscan and Roman mythology, Greek legends  and symbolism remain popular in culture today. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Primary Gods and Legends==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Greek mythology, there are many other demi-gods and heros, but the most well known gods are the immortals who sit upon the thrones of Mt. Olympus. The Olympian gods represent a specific natural element or energy force. They are the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Zeus]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the heavens, or as later mythology would determine, the God of the Gods (Roman Name is Jupiter)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Posiedon&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the seas, who would challenge Athena for the title of patron of Athens (Roman Name is Neptune)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Hades]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the underworld, whom oversaw the sould of the mortally deceased (Roman Name is Pluto) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hera&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of marriage, who served as Zeus&#039; primary and exceedingly jelous wife (Roman Name is Juno) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Demeter&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the harvest, whose daughter was the delicate Persephone (Roman Name is Ceres)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hestia&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the hearth, who tends Mt. Olympus&#039; sacred fire (Roman Name is Vesta) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hephaestus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of blacksmiths and craftsmen, who forged lightning bolts for Zeus (Roman Name is Vulcan)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Athena]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of wisdom, who became the patroness of Athens (Roman Name is [[Minerva]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Artemis&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of hunting and wilderness, who was the twin sister of Apollo (Roman Name is Diana)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Apollo&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of music and light, who was the twin brother of Artemis (Roman Name is Apollo)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Ares&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of war, who was quite reckless in his sides and choices in battle (Roman Name is Mars)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Aphrodite&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of love, who rose from the botton of the sea (Roman Name is Venus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hermes&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of theives and trickery, who also served as a messenger of the Gods (Roman Name is Mercury)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Dionysus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of winemaking and festival, who also has been metaphorically compared to Jesus Christ (Roman Name is Bacchus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Persephone&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess-daughter of Demeter, who also served as the queen of the underworld (Roman Name is Proserpina)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are various other deities, which include the Titans (Cronus, [[Prometheus]], and Epimetheus) and  demi-gods (Pan, Orion, and Minos). The heros of Greek myth and legend are also quite known, with Heracles, Odysseus, Perseus, Theseus, and Achilles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H. P. Blavatsky and Greek Myths==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] references Greek myths and legends often throughout &#039;&#039;The Theosophical Glossary&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled&#039;&#039;. She remarks that the original truth of Greek myths hold significant understanding of the phenomenon of the universe. H. P. Blavatsky elaborated in &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;For a myth, in Greek mythos, means oral tradition, passed from mouth to mouth from one generation to the other; and even in the modern etymology the term stands for a fabulous statement conveying some important truth; a tale of some extraordinary personage whose biography has become overgrown, owing to the veneration of successive generations, with rich popular fancy, but which is no wholesale fable. Like our ancestors, the primitive Aryans, we believe firmly in the personality and intelligence of more than one phenomenon-producing Force in nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. I&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), 425.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also comments on the deeper meaning of the ancient Greek myths, and their greater archetypal meanings for humanity. In regards to the story of [[Prometheus]], Blavatsky extends the condition of Prometheus to the whole experience of collective humanity. She writes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The Titan is more than a thief of the celestial fire. He is a representation of humanity-active, industrious, intelligent, but at the same time ambitious, which aims at equalling divine powers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. II (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 525.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anthropomorphism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In traditional Greek mythology, the gods inhabit bodies that display the vices and virtues that are seen in the lower states of man. Many [[Theosophists]] believe the reason for the anthropomorphism of the gods is to give them the full spectrum of the human experience, including the sensual desires. As [[Alvin Boyd Kuhn]] remarks:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The dark night of the soul,&amp;quot; no less than the Götterdämmerung, was, in the&lt;br /&gt;
ancient mind, just the condition of the soul&#039;s embodiment in physical forms.&lt;br /&gt;
Taylor reasons that Minerva (the rational faculty, as Goddess of Wisdom) was by&lt;br /&gt;
her attachment to body given wholly &amp;quot;to the dangerous employment and abandons&lt;br /&gt;
the proper characteristics of her nature for the destructive revels of desire.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
All this is the dialectic statement of the main theme of ancient theology - the&lt;br /&gt;
incarnation of the godlike intellect and divine soul in the darksome conditions&lt;br /&gt;
of animal bodies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kuhn, Alvin Boyd. &#039;&#039;The Lost Light: An Interpretation of Ancient Scriptures&#039;&#039; (Rahway, NJ: Quinn &amp;amp; Boden Company, 1940), 146.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though many Theosophists describe the human condition of the gods as degrading, [[Annie Besant]] describes the anthropomorphism as an inspiration towards the individual experience of man. She accounts that the fall and triumph of the Greek Olympians serve as a metaphor to man&#039;s ability to rise above the errors of his way. She notes:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;That one who falls thus may quickly rise again is encouraging. That old Greek allegory in which every time that the hero falls to earth, worsted in the conflict, he gains new strength from it, applies to man.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Besant, Annie. &#039;&#039;Talks on the Path of Occultism: Vol. II The Voice of The Silence&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1965), 154.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Importance of Mythology==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In ancient Greece, mythology was revered by the Greeks as a form of art itself. They believed each god should be held sacred for the human ideal that each god represensts. To demonstrate the qualities the gods represent, the Greeks created pieces of art to serve as a physical embodiment of their attributes. Theosophists recognize this tradition, as [[Curuppumullage Jinarājadāsa]] comments: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Similarly it is that during those periods of spiritual dryness we can, if we&lt;br /&gt;
have so trained ourselves, commune with God through various forms of Art, for&lt;br /&gt;
Art fundamentally is a revelation of the Divine Nature, it reveals what Plato&lt;br /&gt;
called the Idea or the Archetype. The ancient Greeks were particularly sensitive&lt;br /&gt;
to this aspect of Art. If they looked at a statue of Apollo, the sun-god, it was&lt;br /&gt;
not merely to them a statue of some handsome youth, but there radiated from the&lt;br /&gt;
statue a mysterious influence, so that they came to feel the influence of God.&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly with the goddess Minerva; they felt, when there was an adequately&lt;br /&gt;
beautiful image in a temple, that somehow as they offered their adoration to it,&lt;br /&gt;
the image was like a wonderful window through which they looked into the Divine&lt;br /&gt;
Nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Discourses on the Bhagavad Gita&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1953), 99.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15231</id>
		<title>Greek mythology</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15231"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T15:54:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* H. P. Blavatsky and Greek Myths */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Greek Mythology&#039;&#039;&#039; is the polytheistic myths and legends beliefs of the ancient Greeks. Ancient Greeks often relied on myths and legends to explain their natural world, such as the change of seasons. Largely inspiring Etruscan and Roman mythology, Greek legends  and symbolism remain popular in culture today. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Primary Gods and Legends==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Greek mythology, there are many other demi-gods and heros, but the most well known gods are the immortals who sit upon the thrones of Mt. Olympus. The Olympian gods represent a specific natural element or energy force. They are the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Zeus]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the heavens, or as later mythology would determine, the God of the Gods (Roman Name is Jupiter)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Posiedon&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the seas, who would challenge Athena for the title of patron of Athens (Roman Name is Neptune)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Hades]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the underworld, whom oversaw the sould of the mortally deceased (Roman Name is Pluto) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hera&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of marriage, who served as Zeus&#039; primary and exceedingly jelous wife (Roman Name is Juno) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Demeter&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the harvest, whose daughter was the delicate Persephone (Roman Name is Ceres)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hestia&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the hearth, who tends Mt. Olympus&#039; sacred fire (Roman Name is Vesta) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hephaestus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of blacksmiths and craftsmen, who forged lightning bolts for Zeus (Roman Name is Vulcan)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Athena]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of wisdom, who became the patroness of Athens (Roman Name is [[Minerva]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Artemis&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of hunting and wilderness, who was the twin sister of Apollo (Roman Name is Diana)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Apollo&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of music and light, who was the twin brother of Artemis (Roman Name is Apollo)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Ares&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of war, who was quite reckless in his sides and choices in battle (Roman Name is Mars)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Aphrodite&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of love, who rose from the botton of the sea (Roman Name is Venus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hermes&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of theives and trickery, who also served as a messenger of the Gods (Roman Name is Mercury)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Dionysus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of winemaking and festival, who also has been metaphorically compared to Jesus Christ (Roman Name is Bacchus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Persephone&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess-daughter of Demeter, who also served as the queen of the underworld (Roman Name is Proserpina)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are various other deities, which include the Titans (Cronus, [[Prometheus]], and Epimetheus) and  demi-gods (Pan, Orion, and Minos). The heros of Greek myth and legend are also quite known, with Heracles, Odysseus, Perseus, Theseus, and Achilles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H. P. Blavatsky and Greek Myths==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] references Greek myths and legends often throughout &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled&#039;&#039;. She remarks that the original truth of Greek myths hold significant understanding of the phenomenon of the universe. H. P. Blavatsky elaborated in &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;For a myth, in Greek mythos, means oral tradition, passed from mouth to mouth from one generation to the other; and even in the modern etymology the term stands for a fabulous statement conveying some important truth; a tale of some extraordinary personage whose biography has become overgrown, owing to the veneration of successive generations, with rich popular fancy, but which is no wholesale fable. Like our ancestors, the primitive Aryans, we believe firmly in the personality and intelligence of more than one phenomenon-producing Force in nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. I&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), 425.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blavatsky also comments on the deeper meaning of the ancient Greek myths, and their greater archetypal meanings for humanity. In regards to the story of [[Prometheus]], Blavatsky extends the condition of Prometheus to the whole experience of collective humanity. She writes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The Titan is more than a thief of the celestial fire. He is a representation of humanity-active, industrious, intelligent, but at the same time ambitious, which aims at equalling divine powers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. II (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 525.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anthropomorphism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In traditional Greek mythology, the gods inhabit bodies that display the vices and virtues that are seen in the lower states of man. Many [[Theosophists]] believe the reason for the anthropomorphism of the gods is to give them the full spectrum of the human experience, including the sensual desires. As [[Alvin Boyd Kuhn]] remarks:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The dark night of the soul,&amp;quot; no less than the Götterdämmerung, was, in the&lt;br /&gt;
ancient mind, just the condition of the soul&#039;s embodiment in physical forms.&lt;br /&gt;
Taylor reasons that Minerva (the rational faculty, as Goddess of Wisdom) was by&lt;br /&gt;
her attachment to body given wholly &amp;quot;to the dangerous employment and abandons&lt;br /&gt;
the proper characteristics of her nature for the destructive revels of desire.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
All this is the dialectic statement of the main theme of ancient theology - the&lt;br /&gt;
incarnation of the godlike intellect and divine soul in the darksome conditions&lt;br /&gt;
of animal bodies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kuhn, Alvin Boyd. &#039;&#039;The Lost Light: An Interpretation of Ancient Scriptures&#039;&#039; (Rahway, NJ: Quinn &amp;amp; Boden Company, 1940), 146.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though many Theosophists describe the human condition of the gods as degrading, [[Annie Besant]] describes the anthropomorphism as an inspiration towards the individual experience of man. She accounts that the fall and triumph of the Greek Olympians serve as a metaphor to man&#039;s ability to rise above the errors of his way. She notes:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;That one who falls thus may quickly rise again is encouraging. That old Greek allegory in which every time that the hero falls to earth, worsted in the conflict, he gains new strength from it, applies to man.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Besant, Annie. &#039;&#039;Talks on the Path of Occultism: Vol. II The Voice of The Silence&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1965), 154.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Importance of Mythology==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In ancient Greece, mythology was revered by the Greeks as a form of art itself. They believed each god should be held sacred for the human ideal that each god represensts. To demonstrate the qualities the gods represent, the Greeks created pieces of art to serve as a physical embodiment of their attributes. Theosophists recognize this tradition, as [[Curuppumullage Jinarājadāsa]] comments: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Similarly it is that during those periods of spiritual dryness we can, if we&lt;br /&gt;
have so trained ourselves, commune with God through various forms of Art, for&lt;br /&gt;
Art fundamentally is a revelation of the Divine Nature, it reveals what Plato&lt;br /&gt;
called the Idea or the Archetype. The ancient Greeks were particularly sensitive&lt;br /&gt;
to this aspect of Art. If they looked at a statue of Apollo, the sun-god, it was&lt;br /&gt;
not merely to them a statue of some handsome youth, but there radiated from the&lt;br /&gt;
statue a mysterious influence, so that they came to feel the influence of God.&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly with the goddess Minerva; they felt, when there was an adequately&lt;br /&gt;
beautiful image in a temple, that somehow as they offered their adoration to it,&lt;br /&gt;
the image was like a wonderful window through which they looked into the Divine&lt;br /&gt;
Nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Discourses on the Bhagavad Gita&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1953), 99.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15230</id>
		<title>Greek mythology</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15230"/>
		<updated>2012-08-13T15:21:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* H. P. Blavatsky and Greek Myths */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Greek Mythology&#039;&#039;&#039; is the polytheistic myths and legends beliefs of the ancient Greeks. Ancient Greeks often relied on myths and legends to explain their natural world, such as the change of seasons. Largely inspiring Etruscan and Roman mythology, Greek legends  and symbolism remain popular in culture today. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Primary Gods and Legends==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Greek mythology, there are many other demi-gods and heros, but the most well known gods are the immortals who sit upon the thrones of Mt. Olympus. The Olympian gods represent a specific natural element or energy force. They are the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Zeus]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the heavens, or as later mythology would determine, the God of the Gods (Roman Name is Jupiter)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Posiedon&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the seas, who would challenge Athena for the title of patron of Athens (Roman Name is Neptune)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Hades]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the underworld, whom oversaw the sould of the mortally deceased (Roman Name is Pluto) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hera&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of marriage, who served as Zeus&#039; primary and exceedingly jelous wife (Roman Name is Juno) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Demeter&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the harvest, whose daughter was the delicate Persephone (Roman Name is Ceres)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hestia&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the hearth, who tends Mt. Olympus&#039; sacred fire (Roman Name is Vesta) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hephaestus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of blacksmiths and craftsmen, who forged lightning bolts for Zeus (Roman Name is Vulcan)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Athena]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of wisdom, who became the patroness of Athens (Roman Name is [[Minerva]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Artemis&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of hunting and wilderness, who was the twin sister of Apollo (Roman Name is Diana)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Apollo&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of music and light, who was the twin brother of Artemis (Roman Name is Apollo)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Ares&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of war, who was quite reckless in his sides and choices in battle (Roman Name is Mars)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Aphrodite&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of love, who rose from the botton of the sea (Roman Name is Venus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hermes&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of theives and trickery, who also served as a messenger of the Gods (Roman Name is Mercury)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Dionysus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of winemaking and festival, who also has been metaphorically compared to Jesus Christ (Roman Name is Bacchus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Persephone&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess-daughter of Demeter, who also served as the queen of the underworld (Roman Name is Proserpina)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are various other deities, which include the Titans (Cronus, [[Prometheus]], and Epimetheus) and  demi-gods (Pan, Orion, and Minos). The heros of Greek myth and legend are also quite known, with Heracles, Odysseus, Perseus, Theseus, and Achilles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H. P. Blavatsky and Greek Myths==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] uses Greek myths and legends often throughout &#039;&#039; The Collected Writings&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled&#039;&#039;. Blavatsky comments on the deeper meaning of the ancient Greek myths, and their greater archetypal meanings for humanity. In regards to the story of [[Prometheus]], Blavatsky extends the condition of Prometheus to the whole experience of collective humanity. She wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The Titan is more than a thief of the celestial fire. He is a representation of humanity-active, industrious, intelligent, but at the same time ambitious, which aims at equalling divine powers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. II (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1979), 525.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;For a myth, in Greek mythos, means oral tradition, passed from mouth to mouth&lt;br /&gt;
from one generation to the other; and even in the modern etymology the&lt;br /&gt;
term stands for a fabulous statement conveying some important truth; a&lt;br /&gt;
tale of some extraordinary personage whose biography has become overgrown,&lt;br /&gt;
owing to the veneration of successive generations, with rich popular&lt;br /&gt;
fancy, but which is no wholesale fable. Like our ancestors, the primitive&lt;br /&gt;
Aryans, we believe firmly in the personality and intelligence of more than&lt;br /&gt;
one phenomenon-producing Force in nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine Vol. I&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1978), 425.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anthropomorphism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In traditional Greek mythology, the gods inhabit bodies that display the vices and virtues that are seen in the lower states of man. Many [[Theosophists]] believe the reason for the anthropomorphism of the gods is to give them the full spectrum of the human experience, including the sensual desires. As [[Alvin Boyd Kuhn]] remarks:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The dark night of the soul,&amp;quot; no less than the Götterdämmerung, was, in the&lt;br /&gt;
ancient mind, just the condition of the soul&#039;s embodiment in physical forms.&lt;br /&gt;
Taylor reasons that Minerva (the rational faculty, as Goddess of Wisdom) was by&lt;br /&gt;
her attachment to body given wholly &amp;quot;to the dangerous employment and abandons&lt;br /&gt;
the proper characteristics of her nature for the destructive revels of desire.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
All this is the dialectic statement of the main theme of ancient theology - the&lt;br /&gt;
incarnation of the godlike intellect and divine soul in the darksome conditions&lt;br /&gt;
of animal bodies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kuhn, Alvin Boyd. &#039;&#039;The Lost Light: An Interpretation of Ancient Scriptures&#039;&#039; (Rahway, NJ: Quinn &amp;amp; Boden Company, 1940), 146.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though many Theosophists describe the human condition of the gods as degrading, [[Annie Besant]] describes the anthropomorphism as an inspiration towards the individual experience of man. She accounts that the fall and triumph of the Greek Olympians serve as a metaphor to man&#039;s ability to rise above the errors of his way. She notes:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;That one who falls thus may quickly rise again is encouraging. That old Greek allegory in which every time that the hero falls to earth, worsted in the conflict, he gains new strength from it, applies to man.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Besant, Annie. &#039;&#039;Talks on the Path of Occultism: Vol. II The Voice of The Silence&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1965), 154.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Importance of Mythology==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In ancient Greece, mythology was revered by the Greeks as a form of art itself. They believed each god should be held sacred for the human ideal that each god represensts. To demonstrate the qualities the gods represent, the Greeks created pieces of art to serve as a physical embodiment of their attributes. Theosophists recognize this tradition, as [[Curuppumullage Jinarājadāsa]] comments: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Similarly it is that during those periods of spiritual dryness we can, if we&lt;br /&gt;
have so trained ourselves, commune with God through various forms of Art, for&lt;br /&gt;
Art fundamentally is a revelation of the Divine Nature, it reveals what Plato&lt;br /&gt;
called the Idea or the Archetype. The ancient Greeks were particularly sensitive&lt;br /&gt;
to this aspect of Art. If they looked at a statue of Apollo, the sun-god, it was&lt;br /&gt;
not merely to them a statue of some handsome youth, but there radiated from the&lt;br /&gt;
statue a mysterious influence, so that they came to feel the influence of God.&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly with the goddess Minerva; they felt, when there was an adequately&lt;br /&gt;
beautiful image in a temple, that somehow as they offered their adoration to it,&lt;br /&gt;
the image was like a wonderful window through which they looked into the Divine&lt;br /&gt;
Nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Discourses on the Bhagavad Gita&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1953), 99.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15229</id>
		<title>Greek mythology</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15229"/>
		<updated>2012-08-09T20:45:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* H. P. Blavatsky and Greek Myths */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Greek Mythology&#039;&#039;&#039; is the polytheistic myths and legends beliefs of the ancient Greeks. Ancient Greeks often relied on myths and legends to explain their natural world, such as the change of seasons. Largely inspiring Etruscan and Roman mythology, Greek legends  and symbolism remain popular in culture today. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Primary Gods and Legends==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Greek mythology, there are many other demi-gods and heros, but the most well known gods are the immortals who sit upon the thrones of Mt. Olympus. The Olympian gods represent a specific natural element or energy force. They are the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Zeus]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the heavens, or as later mythology would determine, the God of the Gods (Roman Name is Jupiter)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Posiedon&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the seas, who would challenge Athena for the title of patron of Athens (Roman Name is Neptune)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Hades]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the underworld, whom oversaw the sould of the mortally deceased (Roman Name is Pluto) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hera&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of marriage, who served as Zeus&#039; primary and exceedingly jelous wife (Roman Name is Juno) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Demeter&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the harvest, whose daughter was the delicate Persephone (Roman Name is Ceres)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hestia&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the hearth, who tends Mt. Olympus&#039; sacred fire (Roman Name is Vesta) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hephaestus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of blacksmiths and craftsmen, who forged lightning bolts for Zeus (Roman Name is Vulcan)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Athena]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of wisdom, who became the patroness of Athens (Roman Name is [[Minerva]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Artemis&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of hunting and wilderness, who was the twin sister of Apollo (Roman Name is Diana)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Apollo&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of music and light, who was the twin brother of Artemis (Roman Name is Apollo)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Ares&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of war, who was quite reckless in his sides and choices in battle (Roman Name is Mars)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Aphrodite&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of love, who rose from the botton of the sea (Roman Name is Venus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hermes&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of theives and trickery, who also served as a messenger of the Gods (Roman Name is Mercury)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Dionysus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of winemaking and festival, who also has been metaphorically compared to Jesus Christ (Roman Name is Bacchus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Persephone&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess-daughter of Demeter, who also served as the queen of the underworld (Roman Name is Proserpina)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are various other deities, which include the Titans (Cronus, [[Prometheus]], and Epimetheus) and  demi-gods (Pan, Orion, and Minos). The heros of Greek myth and legend are also quite known, with Heracles, Odysseus, Perseus, Theseus, and Achilles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H. P. Blavatsky and Greek Myths==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] uses Greek myths and legends often throughout &#039;&#039; The Collected Writings&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled&#039;&#039;. Blavatsky comments on the deeper meaning of the ancient Greek myths, and their greater archetypal meanings for humanity. In regards to the story of [[Prometheus]], Blavatsky extends the condition of Prometheus to the whole experience of collective humanity. She wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The Titan is more than a thief of the celestial fire. He is a representation of humanity-active, industrious, intelligent, but at the same time ambitious, which aims at equalling divine powers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. II (Adyar, Madras: THeosophical Publishing House, 1979), 525.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anthropomorphism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In traditional Greek mythology, the gods inhabit bodies that display the vices and virtues that are seen in the lower states of man. Many [[Theosophists]] believe the reason for the anthropomorphism of the gods is to give them the full spectrum of the human experience, including the sensual desires. As [[Alvin Boyd Kuhn]] remarks:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The dark night of the soul,&amp;quot; no less than the Götterdämmerung, was, in the&lt;br /&gt;
ancient mind, just the condition of the soul&#039;s embodiment in physical forms.&lt;br /&gt;
Taylor reasons that Minerva (the rational faculty, as Goddess of Wisdom) was by&lt;br /&gt;
her attachment to body given wholly &amp;quot;to the dangerous employment and abandons&lt;br /&gt;
the proper characteristics of her nature for the destructive revels of desire.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
All this is the dialectic statement of the main theme of ancient theology - the&lt;br /&gt;
incarnation of the godlike intellect and divine soul in the darksome conditions&lt;br /&gt;
of animal bodies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kuhn, Alvin Boyd. &#039;&#039;The Lost Light: An Interpretation of Ancient Scriptures&#039;&#039; (Rahway, NJ: Quinn &amp;amp; Boden Company, 1940), 146.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though many Theosophists describe the human condition of the gods as degrading, [[Annie Besant]] describes the anthropomorphism as an inspiration towards the individual experience of man. She accounts that the fall and triumph of the Greek Olympians serve as a metaphor to man&#039;s ability to rise above the errors of his way. She notes:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;That one who falls thus may quickly rise again is encouraging. That old Greek allegory in which every time that the hero falls to earth, worsted in the conflict, he gains new strength from it, applies to man.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Besant, Annie. &#039;&#039;Talks on the Path of Occultism: Vol. II The Voice of The Silence&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1965), 154.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Importance of Mythology==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In ancient Greece, mythology was revered by the Greeks as a form of art itself. They believed each god should be held sacred for the human ideal that each god represensts. To demonstrate the qualities the gods represent, the Greeks created pieces of art to serve as a physical embodiment of their attributes. Theosophists recognize this tradition, as [[Curuppumullage Jinarājadāsa]] comments: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Similarly it is that during those periods of spiritual dryness we can, if we&lt;br /&gt;
have so trained ourselves, commune with God through various forms of Art, for&lt;br /&gt;
Art fundamentally is a revelation of the Divine Nature, it reveals what Plato&lt;br /&gt;
called the Idea or the Archetype. The ancient Greeks were particularly sensitive&lt;br /&gt;
to this aspect of Art. If they looked at a statue of Apollo, the sun-god, it was&lt;br /&gt;
not merely to them a statue of some handsome youth, but there radiated from the&lt;br /&gt;
statue a mysterious influence, so that they came to feel the influence of God.&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly with the goddess Minerva; they felt, when there was an adequately&lt;br /&gt;
beautiful image in a temple, that somehow as they offered their adoration to it,&lt;br /&gt;
the image was like a wonderful window through which they looked into the Divine&lt;br /&gt;
Nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Discourses on the Bhagavad Gita&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1953), 99.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15228</id>
		<title>Greek mythology</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15228"/>
		<updated>2012-08-09T20:44:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Anthropomorphism */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Greek Mythology&#039;&#039;&#039; is the polytheistic myths and legends beliefs of the ancient Greeks. Ancient Greeks often relied on myths and legends to explain their natural world, such as the change of seasons. Largely inspiring Etruscan and Roman mythology, Greek legends  and symbolism remain popular in culture today. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Primary Gods and Legends==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Greek mythology, there are many other demi-gods and heros, but the most well known gods are the immortals who sit upon the thrones of Mt. Olympus. The Olympian gods represent a specific natural element or energy force. They are the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Zeus]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the heavens, or as later mythology would determine, the God of the Gods (Roman Name is Jupiter)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Posiedon&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the seas, who would challenge Athena for the title of patron of Athens (Roman Name is Neptune)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Hades]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the underworld, whom oversaw the sould of the mortally deceased (Roman Name is Pluto) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hera&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of marriage, who served as Zeus&#039; primary and exceedingly jelous wife (Roman Name is Juno) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Demeter&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the harvest, whose daughter was the delicate Persephone (Roman Name is Ceres)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hestia&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the hearth, who tends Mt. Olympus&#039; sacred fire (Roman Name is Vesta) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hephaestus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of blacksmiths and craftsmen, who forged lightning bolts for Zeus (Roman Name is Vulcan)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Athena]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of wisdom, who became the patroness of Athens (Roman Name is [[Minerva]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Artemis&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of hunting and wilderness, who was the twin sister of Apollo (Roman Name is Diana)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Apollo&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of music and light, who was the twin brother of Artemis (Roman Name is Apollo)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Ares&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of war, who was quite reckless in his sides and choices in battle (Roman Name is Mars)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Aphrodite&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of love, who rose from the botton of the sea (Roman Name is Venus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hermes&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of theives and trickery, who also served as a messenger of the Gods (Roman Name is Mercury)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Dionysus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of winemaking and festival, who also has been metaphorically compared to Jesus Christ (Roman Name is Bacchus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Persephone&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess-daughter of Demeter, who also served as the queen of the underworld (Roman Name is Proserpina)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are various other deities, which include the Titans (Cronus, [[Prometheus]], and Epimetheus) and  demi-gods (Pan, Orion, and Minos). The heros of Greek myth and legend are also quite known, with Heracles, Odysseus, Perseus, Theseus, and Achilles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H. P. Blavatsky and Greek Myths==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] uses Greek myths and legends often throughout &#039;&#039; The Collected Writings&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled&#039;&#039;. Blavatsky comments on the deeper meaning of the ancient Greek myths, and their greater archetypal meanings for humanity. In regards to the story of [[Prometheus]], Blavatsky extends the condition of Prometheus to the whole experience of humanity. She wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The Titan is more than a thief of the celestial fire. He is a representation of humanity-active, industrious, intelligent, but at the same time ambitious, which aims at equalling divine powers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. II (Adyar, Madras: THeosophical Publishing House, 1979), 525.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anthropomorphism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In traditional Greek mythology, the gods inhabit bodies that display the vices and virtues that are seen in the lower states of man. Many [[Theosophists]] believe the reason for the anthropomorphism of the gods is to give them the full spectrum of the human experience, including the sensual desires. As [[Alvin Boyd Kuhn]] remarks:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The dark night of the soul,&amp;quot; no less than the Götterdämmerung, was, in the&lt;br /&gt;
ancient mind, just the condition of the soul&#039;s embodiment in physical forms.&lt;br /&gt;
Taylor reasons that Minerva (the rational faculty, as Goddess of Wisdom) was by&lt;br /&gt;
her attachment to body given wholly &amp;quot;to the dangerous employment and abandons&lt;br /&gt;
the proper characteristics of her nature for the destructive revels of desire.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
All this is the dialectic statement of the main theme of ancient theology - the&lt;br /&gt;
incarnation of the godlike intellect and divine soul in the darksome conditions&lt;br /&gt;
of animal bodies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kuhn, Alvin Boyd. &#039;&#039;The Lost Light: An Interpretation of Ancient Scriptures&#039;&#039; (Rahway, NJ: Quinn &amp;amp; Boden Company, 1940), 146.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though many Theosophists describe the human condition of the gods as degrading, [[Annie Besant]] describes the anthropomorphism as an inspiration towards the individual experience of man. She accounts that the fall and triumph of the Greek Olympians serve as a metaphor to man&#039;s ability to rise above the errors of his way. She notes:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;That one who falls thus may quickly rise again is encouraging. That old Greek allegory in which every time that the hero falls to earth, worsted in the conflict, he gains new strength from it, applies to man.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Besant, Annie. &#039;&#039;Talks on the Path of Occultism: Vol. II The Voice of The Silence&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1965), 154.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Importance of Mythology==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In ancient Greece, mythology was revered by the Greeks as a form of art itself. They believed each god should be held sacred for the human ideal that each god represensts. To demonstrate the qualities the gods represent, the Greeks created pieces of art to serve as a physical embodiment of their attributes. Theosophists recognize this tradition, as [[Curuppumullage Jinarājadāsa]] comments: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Similarly it is that during those periods of spiritual dryness we can, if we&lt;br /&gt;
have so trained ourselves, commune with God through various forms of Art, for&lt;br /&gt;
Art fundamentally is a revelation of the Divine Nature, it reveals what Plato&lt;br /&gt;
called the Idea or the Archetype. The ancient Greeks were particularly sensitive&lt;br /&gt;
to this aspect of Art. If they looked at a statue of Apollo, the sun-god, it was&lt;br /&gt;
not merely to them a statue of some handsome youth, but there radiated from the&lt;br /&gt;
statue a mysterious influence, so that they came to feel the influence of God.&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly with the goddess Minerva; they felt, when there was an adequately&lt;br /&gt;
beautiful image in a temple, that somehow as they offered their adoration to it,&lt;br /&gt;
the image was like a wonderful window through which they looked into the Divine&lt;br /&gt;
Nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Discourses on the Bhagavad Gita&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1953), 99.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15227</id>
		<title>Greek mythology</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15227"/>
		<updated>2012-08-09T20:40:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Importance of Mythology */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Greek Mythology&#039;&#039;&#039; is the polytheistic myths and legends beliefs of the ancient Greeks. Ancient Greeks often relied on myths and legends to explain their natural world, such as the change of seasons. Largely inspiring Etruscan and Roman mythology, Greek legends  and symbolism remain popular in culture today. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Primary Gods and Legends==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Greek mythology, there are many other demi-gods and heros, but the most well known gods are the immortals who sit upon the thrones of Mt. Olympus. The Olympian gods represent a specific natural element or energy force. They are the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Zeus]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the heavens, or as later mythology would determine, the God of the Gods (Roman Name is Jupiter)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Posiedon&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the seas, who would challenge Athena for the title of patron of Athens (Roman Name is Neptune)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Hades]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the underworld, whom oversaw the sould of the mortally deceased (Roman Name is Pluto) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hera&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of marriage, who served as Zeus&#039; primary and exceedingly jelous wife (Roman Name is Juno) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Demeter&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the harvest, whose daughter was the delicate Persephone (Roman Name is Ceres)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hestia&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the hearth, who tends Mt. Olympus&#039; sacred fire (Roman Name is Vesta) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hephaestus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of blacksmiths and craftsmen, who forged lightning bolts for Zeus (Roman Name is Vulcan)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Athena]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of wisdom, who became the patroness of Athens (Roman Name is [[Minerva]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Artemis&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of hunting and wilderness, who was the twin sister of Apollo (Roman Name is Diana)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Apollo&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of music and light, who was the twin brother of Artemis (Roman Name is Apollo)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Ares&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of war, who was quite reckless in his sides and choices in battle (Roman Name is Mars)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Aphrodite&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of love, who rose from the botton of the sea (Roman Name is Venus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hermes&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of theives and trickery, who also served as a messenger of the Gods (Roman Name is Mercury)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Dionysus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of winemaking and festival, who also has been metaphorically compared to Jesus Christ (Roman Name is Bacchus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Persephone&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess-daughter of Demeter, who also served as the queen of the underworld (Roman Name is Proserpina)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are various other deities, which include the Titans (Cronus, [[Prometheus]], and Epimetheus) and  demi-gods (Pan, Orion, and Minos). The heros of Greek myth and legend are also quite known, with Heracles, Odysseus, Perseus, Theseus, and Achilles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H. P. Blavatsky and Greek Myths==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] uses Greek myths and legends often throughout &#039;&#039; The Collected Writings&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled&#039;&#039;. Blavatsky comments on the deeper meaning of the ancient Greek myths, and their greater archetypal meanings for humanity. In regards to the story of [[Prometheus]], Blavatsky extends the condition of Prometheus to the whole experience of humanity. She wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The Titan is more than a thief of the celestial fire. He is a representation of humanity-active, industrious, intelligent, but at the same time ambitious, which aims at equalling divine powers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. II (Adyar, Madras: THeosophical Publishing House, 1979), 525.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anthropomorphism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In traditional Greek mythology, the gods inhabit bodies that display the vices and virtues that are seen in the lower states of man. Many [[Theosophists]] believe the reason for the anthropomorphism of the gods is to give them the full spectrum of the human experience, including the sensual desires. As [[Alvin Boyd Kuhn]] remarks:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The dark night of the soul,&amp;quot; no less than the Götterdämmerung, was, in the&lt;br /&gt;
ancient mind, just the condition of the soul&#039;s embodiment in physical forms.&lt;br /&gt;
Taylor reasons that Minerva (the rational faculty, as Goddess of Wisdom) was by&lt;br /&gt;
her attachment to body given wholly &amp;quot;to the dangerous employment and abandons&lt;br /&gt;
the proper characteristics of her nature for the destructive revels of desire.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
All this is the dialectic statement of the main theme of ancient theology - the&lt;br /&gt;
incarnation of the godlike intellect and divine soul in the darksome conditions&lt;br /&gt;
of animal bodies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kuhn, Alvin Boyd. &#039;&#039;The Lost Light: An Interpretation of Ancient Scriptures&#039;&#039; (Rahway, NJ: Quinn &amp;amp; Boden Company, 1940), 146.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though many Theosophists describe the human condition of the gods as degrading, [[Annie Besant]] describes the anthropomorphism as an inspiration towards man. She accounts that the fall and triumph of the Greek Olympians serve as a metaphor to man&#039;s ability to rise above the errors of his way. She notes:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;That one who falls thus may quickly rise again is encouraging. That old Greek allegory in which every time that the hero falls to earth, worsted in the conflict, he gains new strength from it, applies to man.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Besant, Annie. &#039;&#039;Talks on the Path of Occultism: Vol. II The Voice of The Silence&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1965), 154.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Importance of Mythology==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In ancient Greece, mythology was revered by the Greeks as a form of art itself. They believed each god should be held sacred for the human ideal that each god represensts. To demonstrate the qualities the gods represent, the Greeks created pieces of art to serve as a physical embodiment of their attributes. Theosophists recognize this tradition, as [[Curuppumullage Jinarājadāsa]] comments: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Similarly it is that during those periods of spiritual dryness we can, if we&lt;br /&gt;
have so trained ourselves, commune with God through various forms of Art, for&lt;br /&gt;
Art fundamentally is a revelation of the Divine Nature, it reveals what Plato&lt;br /&gt;
called the Idea or the Archetype. The ancient Greeks were particularly sensitive&lt;br /&gt;
to this aspect of Art. If they looked at a statue of Apollo, the sun-god, it was&lt;br /&gt;
not merely to them a statue of some handsome youth, but there radiated from the&lt;br /&gt;
statue a mysterious influence, so that they came to feel the influence of God.&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly with the goddess Minerva; they felt, when there was an adequately&lt;br /&gt;
beautiful image in a temple, that somehow as they offered their adoration to it,&lt;br /&gt;
the image was like a wonderful window through which they looked into the Divine&lt;br /&gt;
Nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Discourses on the Bhagavad Gita&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1953), 99.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15226</id>
		<title>Greek mythology</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://theosophy.wiki/w-en/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&amp;diff=15226"/>
		<updated>2012-08-09T20:39:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lauren Rourk: /* Importance of Mythology */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Greek Mythology&#039;&#039;&#039; is the polytheistic myths and legends beliefs of the ancient Greeks. Ancient Greeks often relied on myths and legends to explain their natural world, such as the change of seasons. Largely inspiring Etruscan and Roman mythology, Greek legends  and symbolism remain popular in culture today. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Primary Gods and Legends==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Greek mythology, there are many other demi-gods and heros, but the most well known gods are the immortals who sit upon the thrones of Mt. Olympus. The Olympian gods represent a specific natural element or energy force. They are the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Zeus]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the heavens, or as later mythology would determine, the God of the Gods (Roman Name is Jupiter)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Posiedon&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the seas, who would challenge Athena for the title of patron of Athens (Roman Name is Neptune)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Hades]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of the underworld, whom oversaw the sould of the mortally deceased (Roman Name is Pluto) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hera&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of marriage, who served as Zeus&#039; primary and exceedingly jelous wife (Roman Name is Juno) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Demeter&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the harvest, whose daughter was the delicate Persephone (Roman Name is Ceres)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hestia&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of the hearth, who tends Mt. Olympus&#039; sacred fire (Roman Name is Vesta) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hephaestus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of blacksmiths and craftsmen, who forged lightning bolts for Zeus (Roman Name is Vulcan)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Athena]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of wisdom, who became the patroness of Athens (Roman Name is [[Minerva]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Artemis&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of hunting and wilderness, who was the twin sister of Apollo (Roman Name is Diana)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Apollo&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of music and light, who was the twin brother of Artemis (Roman Name is Apollo)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Ares&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of war, who was quite reckless in his sides and choices in battle (Roman Name is Mars)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Aphrodite&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess of love, who rose from the botton of the sea (Roman Name is Venus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hermes&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of theives and trickery, who also served as a messenger of the Gods (Roman Name is Mercury)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Dionysus&#039;&#039;&#039;: The god of winemaking and festival, who also has been metaphorically compared to Jesus Christ (Roman Name is Bacchus)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Persephone&#039;&#039;&#039;: The goddess-daughter of Demeter, who also served as the queen of the underworld (Roman Name is Proserpina)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are various other deities, which include the Titans (Cronus, [[Prometheus]], and Epimetheus) and  demi-gods (Pan, Orion, and Minos). The heros of Greek myth and legend are also quite known, with Heracles, Odysseus, Perseus, Theseus, and Achilles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H. P. Blavatsky and Greek Myths==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[H. P. Blavatsky]] uses Greek myths and legends often throughout &#039;&#039; The Collected Writings&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled&#039;&#039;. Blavatsky comments on the deeper meaning of the ancient Greek myths, and their greater archetypal meanings for humanity. In regards to the story of [[Prometheus]], Blavatsky extends the condition of Prometheus to the whole experience of humanity. She wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The Titan is more than a thief of the celestial fire. He is a representation of humanity-active, industrious, intelligent, but at the same time ambitious, which aims at equalling divine powers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna. The Secret Doctrine Vol. II (Adyar, Madras: THeosophical Publishing House, 1979), 525.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anthropomorphism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In traditional Greek mythology, the gods inhabit bodies that display the vices and virtues that are seen in the lower states of man. Many [[Theosophists]] believe the reason for the anthropomorphism of the gods is to give them the full spectrum of the human experience, including the sensual desires. As [[Alvin Boyd Kuhn]] remarks:   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The dark night of the soul,&amp;quot; no less than the Götterdämmerung, was, in the&lt;br /&gt;
ancient mind, just the condition of the soul&#039;s embodiment in physical forms.&lt;br /&gt;
Taylor reasons that Minerva (the rational faculty, as Goddess of Wisdom) was by&lt;br /&gt;
her attachment to body given wholly &amp;quot;to the dangerous employment and abandons&lt;br /&gt;
the proper characteristics of her nature for the destructive revels of desire.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
All this is the dialectic statement of the main theme of ancient theology - the&lt;br /&gt;
incarnation of the godlike intellect and divine soul in the darksome conditions&lt;br /&gt;
of animal bodies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kuhn, Alvin Boyd. &#039;&#039;The Lost Light: An Interpretation of Ancient Scriptures&#039;&#039; (Rahway, NJ: Quinn &amp;amp; Boden Company, 1940), 146.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though many Theosophists describe the human condition of the gods as degrading, [[Annie Besant]] describes the anthropomorphism as an inspiration towards man. She accounts that the fall and triumph of the Greek Olympians serve as a metaphor to man&#039;s ability to rise above the errors of his way. She notes:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;That one who falls thus may quickly rise again is encouraging. That old Greek allegory in which every time that the hero falls to earth, worsted in the conflict, he gains new strength from it, applies to man.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Besant, Annie. &#039;&#039;Talks on the Path of Occultism: Vol. II The Voice of The Silence&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1965), 154.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Importance of Mythology==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In ancient Greece, mythology was revered by the Greeks as a form of art itself. They believed each god should be held sacred for the human ideal that each god represensts. To demonstrate the qualities the gods represent, the Greeks created pieces of art to serve as a physical embodiment of these attributes. Theosophists recognize this tradition, as [[Curuppumullage Jinarājadāsa]] comments: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Similarly it is that during those periods of spiritual dryness we can, if we&lt;br /&gt;
have so trained ourselves, commune with God through various forms of Art, for&lt;br /&gt;
Art fundamentally is a revelation of the Divine Nature, it reveals what Plato&lt;br /&gt;
called the Idea or the Archetype. The ancient Greeks were particularly sensitive&lt;br /&gt;
to this aspect of Art. If they looked at a statue of Apollo, the sun-god, it was&lt;br /&gt;
not merely to them a statue of some handsome youth, but there radiated from the&lt;br /&gt;
statue a mysterious influence, so that they came to feel the influence of God.&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly with the goddess Minerva; they felt, when there was an adequately&lt;br /&gt;
beautiful image in a temple, that somehow as they offered their adoration to it,&lt;br /&gt;
the image was like a wonderful window through which they looked into the Divine&lt;br /&gt;
Nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jinarājadāsa, Curuppumullage. &#039;&#039;Discourses on the Bhagavad Gita&#039;&#039; (Adyar, Madras: Theosophical Publishing House, 1953), 99.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lauren Rourk</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>