View source for Esoteric Philosophy

'''Esoteric Philosophy''' is a phrase frequently used in [[Theosophy|Theosophical]] literature to refer to a body of knowledge about the cosmos, the divine, and the human being, and does not take into account only their visible aspect but, more predominantly, their invisible, metaphysical, or spiritual dimension. Thus, Esoteric Philosophy often presents a synthesis of science, religion, and philosophy. Although some tenets of this philosophy have been made public, its real teachings are known only to the [[Initiation|initiates]].

== General description ==

[[Helena Petrovna Blavatsky|H. P. Blavatsky]] wrote:

<blockquote>The Esoteric philosophy is alone calculated to withstand, in this age of crass and illogical materialism, the repeated attacks on all and everything man holds most dear and sacred, in his inner spiritual life.  The true philosopher, the student of the Esoteric Wisdom, entirely loses sight of personalities, dogmatic beliefs and special religions.  Moreover, Esoteric philosophy reconciles all religions, strips every one of its outward, human garments, and shows the root of each to be identical with that of every other great religion.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''The Secret Doctrine'' vol. I, (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), xx.</ref></blockquote>

Although the Esoteric Philosophy can be regarded as essentially one and the same around the world, its expressions vary according to the culture or religion a particular brotherhood of initiates belong to. About this, [[Koot Hoomi|Master K.H.]] wrote:

<blockquote>The true esoteric doctrine being identical in substance though differing in terms; all aiming at the same grand object, but no two agreeing seemingly in the details of procedure. It is an every day occurrence to find students belonging to different schools of occult thought sitting side by side at the feet of the same Guru. Upasika (Madam B.) and [[T. Subba Row|Subba Row]], though pupils of the same Master, have not followed the same Philosophy — the one is [[Buddhism|Buddhist]] and the other an [[Vedānta#Advaita Vedanta|Adwaitee]].<ref>Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., ''The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in chronological sequence'' No. 120 (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 410.</ref></blockquote>

Thus, we find references in the Theosophical literature to an "Arhat Esoteric Philosophy," which is connected to an esoteric Buddhist approach, while the "Aryan Esoteric Philosophy" has [[Hinduism]] as its religious background.

According to Mme. Blavatsky, the Esoteric Philosophy is an objective idealism which, while accepting that ultimately speaking everything we perceive is an "illusion," it still regards as "objective" the relationship between different illusory entities:

<blockquote>Esoteric philosophy, teaching an objective Idealism—though it regards the objective Universe and all in it as Maya, temporary illusion—draws a practical distinction between collective illusion, Mahamaya, from the purely metaphysical stand-point, and the objective relations in it between various conscious Egos so long as this illusion lasts.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''The Secret Doctrine'' vol. I, (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 631.</ref></blockquote>

<blockquote>Maya or illusion is an element which enters into all finite things, for everything that exists has only a relative, not an absolute, reality, since the appearance which the hidden noumenon assumes for any observer depends upon his power of cognition. . . . Nothing is permanent except the one hidden absolute existence which contains in itself the noumena of all realities . . . but all things are relatively real, for the cogniser is also a reflection, and the things cognised are therefore as real to him as himself. . . . Whatever plane our consciousness may be acting in, both we and the things belonging to that plane are, for the time being, our only realities. As we rise in the scale of development we perceive that during the stages through which we have passed we mistook shadows for realities. . . . Only when we shall have reached the absolute Consciousness, and blended our own with it, shall we be free from the delusions produced by Maya.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''The Secret Doctrine'' vol. I, (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 39-40.</ref></blockquote>

== Arhat Esoteric Philosophy ==

This branch of the Esoteric Philosophy is the body of teachings held by the "trans-Himalayan Arhat Esoteric School" to which Mahatmas such as [[Koot Hoomi]], [[Morya]], and [[Djual Khool]] belong. These teachings have also been called "Chaldeo-Tibetan esoteric doctrines"<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''Collected Writings'' vol. III (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1995), 400.</ref> or "Arhat secret doctrine."<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''Collected Writings'' vol. IV (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1991), 575.</ref></blockquote>

Since [[Helena Petrovna Blavatsky|H. P. Blavatsky]] and some of the [[Mahatmas]] declared themselves to be "[[Buddhism|Buddhists]]" and associated to the Gelugpas, the Arhat Esoteric Philosophy has been criticized when its teachings did not agree with the "[[Exotericism|exoteric]]" Buddhism held by different sects. However, this criticism is based on a mistaken idea. The esoteric teachings are different from the exoteric in many respects. As Mme. Blavatsky wrote:

<blockquote>The popular Lamaism, when compared with the real esoteric, or Arahat Buddhism of Tibet, offers a contrast as great as the snow trodden along a road in the valley, to the pure and undefiled mass which glitters on the top of a high mountain peak.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''Collected Writings'' vol. IV (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1991), 14-15.</ref></blockquote>

Mme. Blavatsky claimed that the Prasaṅgika Mādhyamaka teaching, on which the Gelugpa school is based, "broke away from the purely esoteric schools."<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''The Secret Doctrine'' vol. I, (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 43.</ref> She said the teaching they propose "is a semi-exoteric and very popular system among the literati and laymen,"<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''The Theosophical Glossary'' (Krotona, CA: Theosophical Publishing House, 1973), 260.</ref> and that they offer "an anti-esoteric and most rationalistic system."<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''Collected Writings'' vol. XIV (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1995), 392.</ref> Nevertheless, she conceded that some of the Tibetan schools still had their "esoteric divisions," although their doctrines are not known by regular monks:

<blockquote>The Prasanga School is surely the Advaita Philosophy of the land. It was divided into two: one was originally founded by Bhâvaviveka, the Svâtantrika Mâdhyamika School, and the other by Buddhapâlita; both have their exoteric and esoteric divisions. It is necessary to belong to the latter to know anything of the esoteric doctrines of that sect, the most metaphysical and philosophical of all.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''Collected Writings'' vol. X (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1995), 438.</ref></blockquote>

This is why [[Koot Hoomi|Master K.H.]] tells Mr. Sinnett in one of his letters:

<blockquote>Yourself and Mr. Hume have received now more information about the A[rhat] E[soteric] Philosophy than was ever given out to ''non-initiates'' within my knowledge.<ref>Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., ''The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in chronological sequence'' No. 68 (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 202.</ref></blockquote>

This clearly means that their philosophy is not public, whether in Buddhism or any other religion.

There are several reasons why some of the Mahatmas claim to be Buddhists, even if their teachings are different in many respects from what the world knows as "Buddhism." One of them was given by Master K.H. as follows:

<blockquote>Many prefer to call themselves Buddhists not because the word attaches itself to the ecclesiastical system built upon the basic ideas of our Lord Gautama Buddha’s philosophy, but because of the Sanskrit word “Buddhi” — wisdom, enlightenment; and as a silent protest to the vain rituals and empty ceremonials which have in too many cases been productive of the greatest calamities. Such also is the origin of the Chaldean term Mage.<ref>Vicente Hao Chin, Jr., ''The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett in chronological sequence'' No. 120 (Quezon City: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 410.</ref></blockquote>

=== Terminology ===

It has been said the Arhat Esoteric Philosophy uses a secret language known as [[Senzar]]. But even when they use terms known in other philosophies, the meanings that they attach to them may be different from the esoteric ones:

<blockquote>All the words and sentences placed in brackets in the Stanzas and Commentaries are the writer’s.  In some places they may be incomplete and even inadequate from the Hindu standpoint; but in the meaning attached to them in Trans-Himalayan Esotericism they are correct.  In every case the writer takes any blame upon herself.  Having never claimed personal infallibility, that which is given on her own authority may leave much to be desired, in the very abstruse cases where too deep metaphysic is involved. The teaching is offered as it is understood; and as there are seven keys of interpretation to every symbol and allegory, that which may not fit a meaning, say from the psychological or astronomical aspect, will be found quite correct from the physical or metaphysical.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''The Secret Doctrine'' vol. II, (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 22.</ref></blockquote>

In her interaction with students, Mme. Blavatsky stated on several occasions the fact that when teaching she was [[Senzar#Senzar|translating the technical terms]] used in the Esoteric Philosophy into words that people would understand.

=== Relationship to Buddhism ===

Sometimes H. P. Blavatsky and the Mahatmas are criticized because some of their teachings do not agree with the exoteric [[Buddhism]] known to scholars, practitioners, and the general public. However, such a complete agreement should not be expected since it is clearly stated that the Arhat Esoteric Philosophy transcends the Buddhist teachings. In her "Introduction" to the first volume of [[The Secret Doctrine (book)|''The Secret Doctrine'']] Mme. Blavatsky deals at length with this question: 

<blockquote>Furthermore, the records we mean to place before the reader embrace the esoteric tenets of the whole world since the beginning of our humanity, and Buddhistic occultism occupies therein only its legitimate place, and no more. Indeed, the secret portions of the “Dan” or “Jan-na” (“Dhyan”) of Gautama’s metaphysics—grand as they appear to one unacquainted with the tenets of the Wisdom Religion of antiquity—are but a very small portion of the whole. The Hindu Reformer limited his public teachings to the purely moral and physiological aspect of the Wisdom-Religion, to Ethics and MAN alone. Things “unseen and incorporeal,” the mystery of Being outside our terrestrial sphere, the great Teacher left entirely untouched in his public lectures, reserving the hidden Truths for a select circle of his Arhats.  The latter received their Initiation at the famous Saptaparna cave (the Sattapanni of Mahavansa) near Mount Baibhâr (the Webhâra of the Pali MSS). . . Thus the reader is asked to bear in mind the very important difference between orthodox Buddhism—i.e., the public teachings of Gautama the Buddha, and his esoteric Budhism.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''The Secret Doctrine'' vol. I, (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), xx.</ref></blockquote>

The Esoteric Philosophy has a different interpretation even of well-known exoteric teachings, as can be inferred from the following quote:

<blockquote>Alone the Initiate, rich with the lore acquired by numberless generations of his predecessors, directs the “Eye of Dangma” toward the essence of things in which no Maya can have any influence. It is here that the teachings of esoteric philosophy in relation to the Nidanas and the Four Truths become of the greatest importance; but they are secret.<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''The Secret Doctrine'' vol. I, (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1993), 45.</ref></blockquote>

== Aryan Esoteric Philosophy ==

The Aryan Esoteric Philosophy (also referred to as "Brahmanical esoteric doctrine"<ref>Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, ''Collected Writings'' vol. IV (Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing House, 1988), 100.</ref> is the presentation of the Esoteric Philosophy that uses the [[Hinduism|Hindu]] doctrine as a general background. [[T. Subba Row]] was an initiate representative of it.

== See also ==
*[[Senzar]]

== Online resources==
===Articles===
*[http://www.theosophy.ph/encyclo/index.php?title=Esoteric_Philosophy# Esoteric Philosophy] at Theosopedia

===Videos===
*[http://www.theosophicalinstitute.org/medialibrary/viewtitle.php?titleid=81A11488-FFC5-4E5B-AFD4-E16A359D5002# Rebirth of the Esoteric Tradition: 1875 - 2000] by Stephan Hoeller

== Notes ==
<references/>

[[Category:Theosophical concepts]]
[[Category:Concepts in The Secret Doctrine]]